- Joined
- Mar 8, 2006
- Messages
- 5,891
- Reaction score
- 13,243
I think that a good start would be reform of existing laws, so that the people who get on the sex offender list for urination in public and other such offences are no longer there.
Weed out the RSO list so that it really means something.
Maybe we need a Registered Idiotic Conduct list instead?
I know that sex crimes, especially those in which children are the victims, are often "resolved" by allowing the perp to plead down to a lesser charge...something like indecent exposure or possibly public urination. This is a travesty of justice, but it happens a lot. A DA is going to look at a case of a pervert exposing himself or masturbating in public, or even if he observed getting naked with a child and think " how can I prove this and get a conviction?". If the perp claims he was simply urinating, even if this is a ridiculous excuse, a DA might chose to accept that plea instead of risking a jury not believing a victim or witness.
I would never trust a thing an RSO says. Someone who did plea down to public urination is always going to claim that's all he did to get on the list.
I say anyone who pulls it out in public for any reason isn't to be trusted. Let the men find a bathroom, just like the women do...they can wait!
MOO