- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,886
- Reaction score
- 126,718
Out of everything released about the investigation, this is the main thing that doesn't make sense to me and it is why I believe there is some family connection to the disappearance! Remember earlier in the disappearance, several family members said that the girls would never go to the lake? More information has been released (by family and others) indicating that they HAD been to the lake previously.
I live in an area with river access, bike paths, small lakes, and trails within 1 mile of my house. If my daughters had "never been there", or even had been there on occasion, those areas would certainly not be the locations I would look for them within the first 2 hrs of disappearing...AND...if for some reason I THOUGHT they would go to a lake, bike path or river, I would be more focused on the areas closest to my home.
I am convinced, based on my experiences with briefly "missing" my daughters at that age, that someone in this family knew those girls would be there or wanted it to appear that they had been there!
Solving the WHY and HOW will lead to finding the girls!
I think you make a good point. There was one summer when my son fell in with some unsupervised children. He was not honest with me about what he was doing and when he was late, I didn't even know where to begin looking for him. Looking at the location of the Collin's home, it would make more sense to look along the river, which is only a couple of blocks from the house. The decision to look at the lake suggests that someone knew that it was a likely spot.
It could be as simple as one of the relatives knowing that the girls were sneaking off to the lake without Grandma knowing what they were up to, and keeping the secret. Some adults want to be a child's friend, rather than an authoritarian figure, so they keep children's secrets. The person that first suggested the lake is probably the relative that kept the secret from Grandma and the parents. That doesn't mean that the relative was involved with the abduction, only that the relative did not enforce the rules and, as a result, the children were vulnerable to abduction.