IA IA - Elizabeth Collins, 8, & Lyric Cook, 10, Evansdale, 13 July 2012 - #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #821
Is it on JVM tonight???
 
  • #822
You're right, the 12:30 time was given by DCI and later reported in MSM. But the 12:30 sighting is not mentioned anywhere by LE or FBI, to my knowledge. LE has maintained the last sighting was at about 12:15. So who gave DCI the 12:30 time, which was later reported by MSM?

Obviously we don't know everything LE knows, but the time the girls were last seen is important. That 15 minute difference could be very important, IMO, and I'd like to know why DCI is using the 12:30 time.



and TG statement about the bikes.
 
  • #823
  • #824
  • #825
Nothing new, just hype. :( Sigh, so misleading. Glad I didn't have hopes up much.
 
  • #826
WC on phone
 
  • #827
  • #828
Found this bit oddly worded

BBM

"Container deposit money raised will go to The Missing And Exploited Children’s Fund, as requested by most of the missing girls’ family members."

:waitasec::silenced:
 
  • #829
Gma cook said there is no video of the perp, she dosen't know how that started but it's a lie..
She also thinks the bikes were staged at the park, That they never made it there..
Per JVM
 
  • #830
Since there is a lack of conversation today, I'll try to stir some up.

If Lyric and Elizabeth were abducted by a pedophile, do you think he: a) targeted both of the girls; b) targeted one of the girls; or c) was just looking for any young girl?

ETA: I call the pedophile he, but it could be he, she or they.

I think he could have targeted them both. Just like Duncan chose an 8 year old and a 11 year old.

Both of these girls would be of prepubescent age which is usually the desirable ages a pedophile targets.

Yes, it could be a he and a she. I have seen cases recently where a man and woman will work in tandem to kidnap young children for sexual purposes. Just like they did in Jacee Duggard's case.

I feel this was done by a pedophile and Im beginning to believe they did not live in the area but may have been there for some other reason such as having family in the area or were temporarily working in the area. It just seems if it was someone remotely known to the girls LE would have connected the link by now.

It seems they are stumped.

IMO
 
  • #831
Taken from a copy of the email of Sept. 6, 2012 provided by C. Paulson, Asst. Director of IA DCI, to press and state employees. Posted by Foxbluff here:
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - IA IA - Elizabeth Collins, 8, and Lyric Cook, 10, Evansdale, 13 July 2012 - #19

This is not a "reporter" it is an official from DCI, so I tend to believe this is a fact. How the sighting occurred is not disclosed, but I am convinced that it is a real, verified sighting, and not just a rounded out time, or a reporter being sloppy.

JMHO...


There were NO OTHER sightings between 12:30 and 2 that we know of right?
 
  • #832
Gma cook said there is no video of the perp, she doesn't know how that started but it's a lie..
She also thinks the bikes were staged at the park, That they never made it there..
Per JVM


Yes, She said She Called LE and they told her No Video of the girls....

BUT,


If this is an on going investigation, would they tell her there was?
 
  • #833
And, why the 2 pm 'bikes found'???????????

Yes, that too.

Perhaps a witness saw the bikes at the lake around 2:00 that day. The bikes were "officially" found by the volunteer firefighter between 3:30-4:00 (reports on that time vary). Later the witness learns about Lyric and Elizabeth (maybe local evening news) and tells LE about seeing the girls' bikes around 2:00. So voila, the time the bikes were found changes to 2:00.

JMO, there could be other explanations. Also IMO, the witness must have been able to provide good enough descriptions of the bikes to convince LE that the bikes belonged to the girls.
 
  • #834
I think gramma is wrong, why would the dogs detect their scents at the lake?
 
  • #835
Gma cook said there is no video of the perp, she dosen't know how that started but it's a lie..
She also thinks the bikes were staged at the park, That they never made it there..
Per JVM

Calling it a lie seems harsh to me. Does Gma Cook think that police tell the family every detail? I'm sure they've been told by now why LE can't do that. Maybe there is video she doesn't know about.
 
  • #836
Gma cook said there is no video of the perp, she dosen't know how that started but it's a lie..
She also thinks the bikes were staged at the park, That they never made it there..
Per JVM

I thought Jane was very gracious in explaining to Wylma that LE is searching hours of tapes and needs help to know what (vehicle, etc.) to look for.
 
  • #837
I think he could have targeted them both. Just like Duncan chose an 8 year old and a 11 year old.

Both of these girls would be of prepubescent age which is usually the desirable ages a pedophile targets.

Yes, it could be a he and a she. I have seen cases recently where a man and woman will work in tandem to kidnap young children for sexual purposes. Just like they did in Jacee Duggard's case.

I feel this was done by a pedophile and Im beginning to believe they did not live in the area but may have been there for some other reason such as having family in the area or were temporarily working in the area. It just seems if it was someone remotely known to the girls LE would have connected the link by now.

It seems they are stumped.

IMO
b b m
 
  • #838
There were NO OTHER sightings between 12:30 and 2 that we know of right?

LE says the girls were last seen at 12:15. DCI says the girls were last seen at 12:30. So there no other sightings between 12:15-2:00 (LE) or 12:30-2:00 (DCI), to my knowledge.
 
  • #839
Dang. Now I'm even more confused than normal. Because this not only mentions a 12:30 sighting but that the bikes were found at 2 PM.

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I wonder if they could be referring to the lawn watering guy
 
  • #840
Yes, She said She Called LE and they told her No Video of the girls....

BUT,


If this is an on going investigation, would they tell her there was?

Well yes, but in the same breath if they thought they had a car or person on video, the family may recognize. They would be the first to see it.
Why play guessing games if some one could ID it.
I felt that they threw the video stuff at the wall to see if it would stick. Scare the perp, see if someone moves. That sort of thing.
It is a slimy mess that no one claims now...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
144
Guests online
3,311
Total visitors
3,455

Forum statistics

Threads
632,630
Messages
18,629,400
Members
243,228
Latest member
sandy83
Back
Top