- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,903
- Reaction score
- 126,808
I think their reason for being at the location where the bodies were found was to dump the bodies, possibly the murders were committed there as well. Why would someone have to have a reason for being there?
I could be wrong entirely, but it does not look all that remote to me, nor does it look like a thickly wooded area. Some trees, yes, maybe tall weeds. But not nearly as thick and overgrown as the area I am from. We can walk a quarter of a mile behind our house and be in woods so thick you can get lost before you know it. So isn't it possible that even someone who does not know the area that well could stumble across this place by accident? There is a lake close by and I noticed that it wasn't that far away from where cars/trucks could get to. I just don't get this idea that someone had to know the area very well. Isn't that how so many places got discovered in this country to begin with? By exploring? It's not like it's 100 miles from civilization.
My first thought was that they were abducted on Friday at noon and murdered when the sun went down. I assumed that they had been there the entire time, that they were identified by some clothing and the fact that they were the only two missing children in the area.
I read something about JVM here, so I read the transcripts ... that is the only place where I have seen a reference to "dump site" and "refrigeration". That's a pretty crazy rumor to start!
It has to be one or the other: either they were immediately murdered, or they were kept alive for some time and then taken to the seven bridges park. Refrigeration is a wild, long shot from the "fertile imagination" of a talking head. "Dump site" has a 50% chance of being correct.