Yes just wondering what the federal labs do that the state lab does not. Maybe something to do with partial DNA?
The wording of the article pretty much states it:
(a) "the national lab has greater capabilities than those at the state level"
Means just what it says. Can test materials for dna, partial prints, particle and fibre analysis,
etc. State labs generally don't have the capability, flexibility, depth, or staff or time! Most
State forensic labs are pretty much a cookie cutter operation. Give them the dough and they
have twelve patterns you can chose from - camels, fish, dogs, cats, bird, cow, star, santa,
reindeer, etc. Plus they do prints and photo matching. This in contrast to State Hygenic Labs
which today are very sophisticated operations ...
(b) "“It’s predominately evidence that would have DNA relevance,” Meyers said. “We’ve been
working for the last week or so to determine what evidence would meet the necessary
submission for the FBI crime lab.”
That could include clothing, blood stained evidence, skin cell evidence looking for contact dna.
Etc. Sounds like they have been talking to Quantico probably enumerating the material
evidence they have, and asking Quantico to advise on what to send in for testing ... the tests
could be for a variety of things not just dna/mtdna.
(c) "He would not say what the evidence was or where it was found"
Probably includes several or even many types of evidence from both locations ... to do a
comparative analysis.
The article is shallow on any real details except perhaps for the pace at which things are
proceeding ... sounds like the bulk of major evidence at Dayton has been collected, they
contacted the FBI to arrange for testing which in this case is the proper direction to go ...
and it could be a number of months before any results are available.
That's my reading of this article.