~n/t~
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2011
- Messages
- 17,670
- Reaction score
- 83
An individual with the initials DC was arrested and booked this morning on a variety of interesting charges.
http://www.bhcso.org/WhosInJail.aspx
Race: Black
An individual with the initials DC was arrested and booked this morning on a variety of interesting charges.
http://www.bhcso.org/WhosInJail.aspx
Hi Sarx! Thanks for your help!
I have a question. This family says that the fbi had their dogs walk by all of them standing in a line before they sent them on the search for each of the girls' scents.
Is this standard practice?
Waaaay behind on this one, sorry. Do they rent paddleboats (where they would keep a log of when they were out) or is it just bring your own?
An individual with the initials DC was arrested and booked this morning on a variety of interesting charges.
http://www.bhcso.org/WhosInJail.aspx
He waited until he heard that the girls were missing. It was later in the day on Friday. The article you were looking at is showing him talking to LE again. Probably just going over the details again.Ok, thank you all you wonderful posters! Now I see that the man on the bike did not tell police that same day that he had seen the bikes at 12:20 and swerved to miss them. He told police on MONDAY, not Friday.
Which leads me to a new question --
Why in the world did he wait until Monday?
And why aren't the police considering him credible enough to make this part of the timeline?
How about :rocker:Yep, they were doing what we call missing member. In a family situation there is likely to be a lot of cross contamination on the scent articles (Mom picking up the laundry, brother's laundry being dropped on top, toothbrush being moved by someone else, and so on...) so this allows the dog to tell who is still there and what scent is on there that "doesn't belong" if you will. Does that make sense? If I did a cruddy job of explaining please feel free to go "huh???" and I'll try again!
Hi all. Not sure that my remote message made it on here yesterday, so I'll try again. I've been off the grid for a week but came back to see there were some pm's regarding this case and questions about what the dogs did. If there are still questions I'd be happy to try and answer.
Yep, they were doing what we call missing member. In a family situation there is likely to be a lot of cross contamination on the scent articles (Mom picking up the laundry, brother's laundry being dropped on top, toothbrush being moved by someone else, and so on...) so this allows the dog to tell who is still there and what scent is on there that "doesn't belong" if you will. Does that make sense? If I did a cruddy job of explaining please feel free to go "huh???" and I'll try again!
Do they actually say, congratulations, youve passed with flying colors? Ive not had the dubious pleasure of undergoing a polygraph
He waited until he heard that the girls were missing. It was later in the day on Friday. The article you were looking at is showing him talking to LE again. Probably just going over the details again.
I don't know why you think the police aren't using his sighting in the timeline. This is what the 12:20 time is based on. :waitasec:
It was reported both that the cyclist who saw the girls' bikes reported the sighting to the PD and also approached officers at the lake. There is a picture of him talking with the officers at the lake. My question is when did he go to the PD to report it? After he talked with officers at the lake during the search? And what was he doing there for 3-4 hours that day?
"As the group searched, a bicyclist stopped the officers to say he saw the two kids bikes on the trail at about 12:20 p.m., but no sign of the children.
Ted Gamerdinger of Waterloo said he rides the trail often.
I saw the bikes laying on the path and had to swerve to miss them, Gamerdinger said. He then went to the Evansdale Police Department to report the sighting."
Read More: http://wcfcourier.com/news/local/au...217-11e1-aec0-0019bb2963f4.html#ixzz21TZfAxVj
She says she passed - but the FBI lady refused to comment.
He waited until he heard that the girls were missing. It was later in the day on Friday. The article you were looking at is showing him talking to LE again. Probably just going over the details again.
I don't know why you think the police aren't using his sighting in the timeline. This is what the 12:20 time is based on. :waitasec:
It was in the first link I posted about 2 threads ago. Unfortunately, that article is no longer available.How do you know that he talked to them Friday and then again on Monday? The 2 links someone provided on the last page indicated that he had come forward on Monday. (If he did talk to them on Friday at 4, which I thought I had heard, that is really odd. The bikes were found at 4pm. There is no way that word was out all over the entire community already. It is too soon for him to have heard the girls were missing.) I cannot find one link that says he made the report on Friday though. It looks like it was Monday.
Reporters asked about him in the Friday press conference (3 days ago) and were told that Abben was unaware of him. Every timeline I have seen released by the police or discussed by them only says they were last seen at 12:15 and that their bikes were found at 4pm. None make mention of a bike-sighting at 12:20.
Do you have a link to one that does?