Kell1
Verified law enforcement
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
- Messages
- 1,289
- Reaction score
- 5,202
I agree with where you are coming from and I would consider going one step further and using analytical skills by a trained analyst to look at the data dump of all the cell phone numbers utilising the masts in the area
( setting parameters from a couple of weeks before the abduction all the way through to the girls being found) which will run into thousands but it would be easy to write a computer programme to pick out cell phone numbers from the data dump that have been in the area of abduction and the area of body deposition more than once . An analyst would be able to chart how many of the thousands of cell phone numbers passing through the two areas using the timeframe parameters detailed above , were in both areas and see of those that were in each area more than once , looking at what date and time so that regular people going between home and work for example, can be filtered out . Other filters can also be applied accordingly when compared to the intelligence that LE already has and that will significantly reduce the hits until you have a select number that cross reference both the abduction site and deposition site and once the girls are found, the number tails off and is not prolific in the area from there on in. That way you can have a starting block of cell phone numbers and their owners that you can rule out. It’s not as mammoth a task as first appears when utilising a specific programme designed to weed out the irrelevant numbers when looking at days and times of occurrence and then potentially stopping once girls are found . DYKWIM?
I agree, its a very good idea at this point what could it hurt?
You may also be able to scrutinize fuel receipts, traffic cams, and compare them to people who live near the area where the girls were abducted any traffic tickets ,
A friend of mine once suggested taking a flier and trying to obtain satellite pictures, of the areas in question that day , i feel that's a bit of a long shot , Ive tried it on the old google earth , but it proved fruitless. Though it does give you a good idea of where the suspect most likely stopped his vehicle etc..
I don't now how that works, but its WAY beyond my pay scale , but at this point at least, outward the investigation looks stymied again, what could it hurt if they could?
I feel the key is someone coming forward and saying they saw someone in the area where the girls were found ... hes a local, someone there knows or suspects something they just arent talking or need that one tip to push their suspicions over the edge
Or scare them enough that they believe they are going to be implicated for aiding and abetting that they talk