Again CR was in the wrong, not the employer.Doesn’t seem like it’s a discriminatory thing. He wasn’t who he said he was.
That's bizarre; encourages fraud.SS death records are public. You can look at the death records for someone on Ancestry. It will show birth date, death date, legal name and yes, SSN.
Unless the employer didn't really try to verify CR's credentials at all. Identity theft is a serious crime.Again CR was in the wrong, not the employer.
Yes, it does. And e-Verify would have caught it if the owner of the # was dead.That's bizarre; encourages fraud.
If he had a state issued ID or birth certificate and SS card he will pass e verify.Unless the employer didn't really try to verify CR's credentials at all. Identity theft is a serious crime.
I don't believe it is discriminatory to question it. I do believe it is discriminatory to deny CR the job based on his race. Obviously, they hired him.
I don't think that info is available; but LE will have details of who the ID and SS number belongs too; that's probably been the easiest part of the investigation.There is 8,904 birth records for the name John Budd in Ancestry. There may be several people walking around with that name. If anyone knows dob, I will research further.
That's bizarre; encourages fraud.
We don't know if his birthday matches the real John Budd. If it doesn't, e-Verify would have flagged it.If he had a state issued ID or birth certificate and SS card he will pass e verify.
It's against Federal law to hire illegal immigrants.Prohibited Practices- www.eeoc.gov
It is against Federal law to ask a hire questions about their race or national origin, or to refuse to hire them for the same reason.
I wonder if they choose real infant deaths for the fake id’s; maybe apply for ssn after ordering a copy of the birth certificate.....just an idea. When I was a child we had to wait for a ssn until school age and in the 90s it wasnt automatic either.Welcome to the www. The Feds have a list of SSN's of the deceased. That is one of the things checked when you call in to verify (not e-verify an SSN). CR's employer did what was required by the law, and maybe not much more. But, also, the employer won't admit knowledge of info that could be provided by prohibited questions. It is a wink, wink, nod, nod practice that is common in the industry.
It's even easier than all that.Thank you; I suppose like everything, it can be forged.
And it's against federal law for a potential employer to ask a person their ethnicity or their immigration status.It's against Federal law to hire illegal immigrants.
I think the hardier part is determining who supplied CR with the fraudulent Social Security number. They arrested a guy in Nebraska last month because he was recruiting the illegals and supplying the fake documents and forced the employees to then cash their paychecks at his grocery store. He kept a portion claiming it was for federal tax withholding. He scammed the employees of nearly $8 million dollars. Mollie's murder has really shined a light on employers.I don't think that info is available; but LE will have details of who the ID and SS number belongs too; that's probably been the easiest part of the investigation.
The employer is supposed to VERIFY every employee's immigration status. Form I-9 is required.It's even easier than all that.
And it's against federal law for a potential employer to ask a person their ethnicity or their immigration status.
From what I found they only brought in search dogs, they only search for live humans
That’s why I was wondering if anyone knows if they ever brought in cadaver dogs.
With someone missing that long the chances of them being found alive are slim