IA IA - Rose Burkert, 22, & Roger Atkison, 32, Williamsburg, 12 Sept 1980

You mean...told to wait there because he already had company and she knew it and he wanted to talk to them alone?

That or had her hide there knowing he was getting company. I'm not sure they would have let her leave when they entered the room though.

Or maybe he spotted father in law and grew paranoid...told her to wait at the bar for a bit. Maybe he went outside to see for himself. There could have been a period of time when they thought they were followed and hid out.

Roger had been acting paranoid in the week leading up to it. I think it's possible they saw they were being followed or realized it after they got to the hotel.
 
Sounds reasonable.

If Rose was at the bar alone hiding out on his orders, there would have been a good possibility that maybe she told the bartender about this problem and who was following them and acted hysterically, which led the other patrons to believe she was arguing with the bartender.

You know, it's also possible that the bartender learned too much information for his own good, which could explain his sudden departure the next day.
 
Sounds reasonable.

If Rose was at the bar alone hiding out on his orders, there would have been a good possibility that maybe she told the bartender about this problem and who was following them and acted hysterically, which led the other patrons to believe she was arguing with the bartender.

You know, it's also possible that the bartender learned too much information for his own good, which could explain his sudden departure the next day.

All very true, but too bad because that would make him the best witness they had. I know they did interview him later, and nothing came of it. It would be interesting to have a script of that.

I read an article that says they checked in at 7:40. I wonder if they felt they were followed already by the time they arrived at the hotel. If so, maybe she went straight to the bar and he went to the room.

If they ordered room service at 9, you'd think everything was running smoothly at that point in time. The more I think about this, the more I think the room was entered somewhere between 10-1. Rose either walked in to find them still there or they entered shortly after the bar incident.

I've tried to find the bartender's name, but haven't had any luck. I also reached out to the cleaning lady who found the bodies a while back but she was traumatized by the whole thing and wouldn't talk about it. It's hard to find anyone who was around at the time who would know any new details on this.
 
I find strange the police didn't get nothing of ordinary from the bartender later on. No info available about what were the Q&A?
In your link, they say "received three telephone calls — two from Rose’s babysitter and one from an unknown party." - It seems the motel rendez-vous were not quite so secret after all. And who was this third caller???? But there isn't some source stating the couple were not having plans about the motel, and that they went there out of the blue?? I think we need to write report about this, chronologically and rational with all the available info out there. Sometimes straighting things lead to some tiny discoveries that can mount up to bigger ones.
 
Anybody knows why Rose and Roger chose the Amana-Inn in Williamsburg, Iowa, since they lived in Saint Joseph, Missouri?? I read that Roger told his wife he would be involved in a work project for the weekend in Cahokia, Missouri (Although there is no Cahokia in that state so I assume it is a error typo of the source) Most likely, Cahokia in Illinois. Wouldn't be preferable to go out near the Nebraska's or Kansas' border and check in in some motel? Currently, you take 4 hours and half minutes to go from St. Joseph to Williamsburg... in 1980 it would be the double of the time I guess. Any clue why they choose the Amana-Inn?

Just for the record: Rose's ex had passed a polygraph test and had a solid alibi, but man, how crazy the guy must've been...
 
It seems the motel had been largely renovated and the owners are different these days. The motel goes by the name Ramada Williamsburg and Wasserbahn Waterpark, in 2211 U Avenue, Williamsburg, Iowa 52361.

https://goo.gl/3c47Pw (Google shortened URL)
 
There's two plausible possibilities:

1 - Random murder - Someone at the motel was a serial killer or a wacko and killed both. (Not plausible at all at the first sight I'm afraid)
2 - Premeditated murder - And this seems the right possibility. But then again, if the murders were planned (or happened in the course of something) then the killer or killers must have followed them or obtained the information where they were. Did Rose's babysitter been questioned? Did she'd been coersed into telling the whereabouts of Roger and Rose? I did not read anything about it but it seems that this was not the case, because she would describe the persuader(s) to the police later. One of the keys to solve this case relies in how and when the killer(s) knew where they were heading to romantically strolling. Another situation is to know exactly if Rose and Burket had plans to go to that specific motel or if it was randomly chosen at the last minute. Maybe Roger knew the motel from a previous work around Williamsburg or just checked a yellow page book. And then there's the main essential question. What was the real motive for the crime? Vendetta, revnege because Roger was a womanizer and a cheating husband? How far a person goes to kill two people because of a extramarital love affair? An uncle, a father in law? People can head to a wrong direction because in this case there are a wide array of very singular persons: A drug addict and crazy sob ex boyfriend and a serial killer (Roger's uncle). Who could think Roger's uncle could kill his own nephew just because of a love affair? If he did it, it was for other reason or matter? There are a lot of crazy, very violent and sadistic serial killers that do not touch their families (BTK, aka Dennis Rader for instance). I think, the major possibility here fall right in Rose's ex boyfriend. Didn't he slaughtered and hanged her dog as a warning? Sometimes polygraph tests are inaccurate and alibis could very well been perfectly forged. Police at first must have been baffled by no apparent reason of the murders and fell short of doing a serious investigation in some serious and potential matters.
 
I find strange the police didn't get nothing of ordinary from the bartender later on. No info available about what were the Q&A?
In your link, they say "received three telephone calls — two from Rose’s babysitter and one from an unknown party." - It seems the motel rendez-vous were not quite so secret after all. And who was this third caller???? But there isn't some source stating the couple were not having plans about the motel, and that they went there out of the blue?? I think we need to write report about this, chronologically and rational with all the available info out there. Sometimes straighting things lead to some tiny discoveries that can mount up to bigger ones.

I may have mistyped. Three phone calls. One was to the babysitter to let her know where they were. The other two, I don't know if they were even incoming or outgoing. I've given this some thought and it's possible one phone call was from the hotel desk asking to move the car. I don't know that for sure. They also ordered room service, so the other two phone calls may have no significance and if they did, I figure the police would have been able to figure that out. I could be wrong. I don't believe this was a case that the police necessarily messed up.

I know there had been some issues because it was across state lines. Major players from Missouri, but it happened in Iowa. Additionally, another murder took place shortly after and resources went there. We're also talking about a time when there wouldn't be as much footage or security. If this happened today, no doubt these guys would have been caught.

Back to my main point: I don't make a ton out of the calls, other than to establish timeline. Now, if we were to learn a call was made to Roger's wife, that would be a different story.

I'd like to establish a timeline as well. One article said they checked in at 8:40 and that's the last time anyone saw them alive, but that wouldn't be true if the bartender and Rose had a confrontation. Is it possible they went to the hotel bar and had a drink before they even ordered room service? Probably not, but the timeline is hard to establish without knowing these details for certain.
 
Anybody knows why Rose and Roger chose the Amana-Inn in Williamsburg, Iowa, since they lived in Saint Joseph, Missouri?? I read that Roger told his wife he would be involved in a work project for the weekend in Cahokia, Missouri (Although there is no Cahokia in that state so I assume it is a error typo of the source) Most likely, Cahokia in Illinois. Wouldn't be preferable to go out near the Nebraska's or Kansas' border and check in in some motel? Currently, you take 4 hours and half minutes to go from St. Joseph to Williamsburg... in 1980 it would be the double of the time I guess. Any clue why they choose the Amana-Inn?

Just for the record: Rose's ex had passed a polygraph test and had a solid alibi, but man, how crazy the guy must've been...

Roger was working out of town the previous week and Rose was hanging out with him. Roger was working but had planned a weekend getaway with Rose and didn't return home like he was supposed to. He told his wife that he was just going to stay instead of avoid the drive. As to what his excuse would have been over the next couple days, I have no idea.

I always assumed they just stopped when they saw a hotel on the way to their destination. The fact that they only got in because of a last minute cancellation would lead me to believe they hadn't preplanned a lot.
 
There's two plausible possibilities:

1 - Random murder - Someone at the motel was a serial killer or a wacko and killed both. (Not plausible at all at the first sight I'm afraid)
2 - Premeditated murder - And this seems the right possibility. But then again, if the murders were planned (or happened in the course of something) then the killer or killers must have followed them or obtained the information where they were. Did Rose's babysitter been questioned? Did she'd been coersed into telling the whereabouts of Roger and Rose? I did not read anything about it but it seems that this was not the case, because she would describe the persuader(s) to the police later. One of the keys to solve this case relies in how and when the killer(s) knew where they were heading to romantically strolling. Another situation is to know exactly if Rose and Burket had plans to go to that specific motel or if it was randomly chosen at the last minute. Maybe Roger knew the motel from a previous work around Williamsburg or just checked a yellow page book. And then there's the main essential question. What was the real motive for the crime? Vendetta, revnege because Roger was a womanizer and a cheating husband? How far a person goes to kill two people because of a extramarital love affair? An uncle, a father in law? People can head to a wrong direction because in this case there are a wide array of very singular persons: A drug addict and crazy sob ex boyfriend and a serial killer (Roger's uncle). Who could think Roger's uncle could kill his own nephew just because of a love affair? If he did it, it was for other reason or matter? There are a lot of crazy, very violent and sadistic serial killers that do not touch their families (BTK, aka Dennis Rader for instance). I think, the major possibility here fall right in Rose's ex boyfriend. Didn't he slaughtered and hanged her dog as a warning? Sometimes polygraph tests are inaccurate and alibis could very well been perfectly forged. Police at first must have been baffled by no apparent reason of the murders and fell short of doing a serious investigation in some serious and potential matters.

I'd agree that #1 isn't as plausible.

I always wondered if someone talked to the babysitter as well, but she was probably interviewed about that extensively (I'd hope so anyway).

Keep in mind that Roger's uncle was actually his uncle-in-law. Prior to this, CRH had murdered before and even though this wasn't his MO, he had just escaped from an institution on Sept 6th (according to 1 source but I can't confirm for sure). In the past, he'd return home, so he may have been around with his brother, when his niece was breaking down about Roger's infidelities. I know the wife knew what was happening. It'd happened before and Roger had been out of town and extended his stay. The wife broke down to her church group the day before. She also had been babysitting a couple other kids that weekend and they later said she'd been acting strange and changing plans with them spontaneously.

I think the wife didn't want to be with Roger anymore. I think she may have broke down because Roger extended his stay and her father and uncle offered to bust him in the act, which meant following. Was murder a part of the equation at that point? I couldn't tell you. I know she cashed in on a life insurance policy. I know she sued the hotel and made out well. I know she was married within a couple years of the murder. I know she never pursued justice until she finally was interviewed last year at someone else's persuasion.

I think it was premeditated, but last minute. Does that even make sense? She breaks down because Roger is leaving. Uncle and father offer to take care of him, confront him, bust him in the act, maybe even kill him. Or they confronted, killed, told her what they did and they dealt with it then.

BTW, I used to think the uncle probably had nothing to do with this. I didn't take mention of his name seriously at all. I actually believed only one person was in the room and I thought it was related to Rose. It was through someone close to the case who knows someone even closer to the case, messages relayed back and forth, that I found out that it was probably her father and brother. Once I heard that and started working with that narrative, a lot of things fell into place.
 
Roger was working out of town the previous week and Rose was hanging out with him. Roger was working but had planned a weekend getaway with Rose and didn't return home like he was supposed to. He told his wife that he was just going to stay instead of avoid the drive. As to what his excuse would have been over the next couple days, I have no idea.

I read Roger told his wife of a work project in Cahokia, Illinois that would last a weekend. Instead he was planning to hang out with Rose off course.

I always assumed they just stopped when they saw a hotel on the way to their destination. The fact that they only got in because of a last minute cancellation would lead me to believe they hadn't preplanned a lot.

That's very weird and confusing, don't you think? What destination they were pursuing? I think Roger was the one concerning the idea to stay at the Amana-Inn beforehand but he probably didn't thought the motel would be packed with a mortician convention. He surely thought they would check-in with no problem. But they got lucky and there was a last-minute cancellation, or should I say unlucky? What you're saying mcbrainder, puts us in the path of enigmatic questions and some possibilities: If they stopped out of the blue, how did the killer(s) knew where they were? They were following them? But how much time and since when? The only possibility I guess is that someone knew where they were thru someone, that directly or indirectly gave the place where they were staying. So, the 3 phone calls are very important to know about it. The two FROM the babysitter obviously implies that Rose had told her before leaving where they would stay, so the planning was indeed thought beforehand, even if neither of the two had phoned to the motel to book a room. The other call they say it was from a third party (unknown). The police must have checked this, and if they say it was unknown, we must eliminate the motel's calls.
 
Keep in mind that Roger's uncle was actually his uncle-in-law. Prior to this, CRH had murdered before and even though this wasn't his MO, he had just escaped from an institution on Sept 6th (according to 1 source but I can't confirm for sure). In the past, he'd return home, so he may have been around with his brother, when his niece was breaking down about Roger's infidelities. I know the wife knew what was happening. It'd happened before and Roger had been out of town and extended his stay. The wife broke down to her church group the day before. She also had been babysitting a couple other kids that weekend and they later said she'd been acting strange and changing plans with them spontaneously.

Ok, but do you know where Roger and Rose where before September 12? Can you trace their moves 2 or 3 days prior to the murders? If Roger's wife thought of the probable cause of the infidelity and CRH was there before Sep 12 and she told him her frustrations and CRH got mad and set his murderous thoughts in motion, there is the question... how CRH knew where they would be? Who was the men she married after Roger's death? Let me guess, someone from Roger's telephone company? Just asking. There are a lot of ifs and maybes. I know american law has this thing of no stature of limitation, which means you can be 128 years old and if they find you're a murderer you get nailed and thrown into court no matter what. So, there is the remote possibility that someday they could open their files to the public about these sort of cases? I guess not, I never heard such thing except for military or intelligent cases.
 
I read Roger told his wife of a work project in Cahokia, Illinois that would last a weekend. Instead he was planning to hang out with Rose off course.

It was Kahoka, Missouri, which is where I am from. I may have even been in Kahoka that day when they left for Amana.
 
It was Kahoka, Missouri, which is where I am from. I may have even been in Kahoka that day when they left for Amana.

Thank you mysterymike. Journals tend to have always mistypes and wrong information. The reporter probably didn't know how to write or research into the word Kahoka. His journal referred Cahokia, Missouri, but a city with that name does not exist in MO, only in Illinois. Thank you for your remark.
 
I read Roger told his wife of a work project in Cahokia, Illinois that would last a weekend. Instead he was planning to hang out with Rose off course.



That's very weird and confusing, don't you think? What destination they were pursuing? I think Roger was the one concerning the idea to stay at the Amana-Inn beforehand but he probably didn't thought the motel would be packed with a mortician convention. He surely thought they would check-in with no problem. But they got lucky and there was a last-minute cancellation, or should I say unlucky? What you're saying mcbrainder, puts us in the path of enigmatic questions and some possibilities: If they stopped out of the blue, how did the killer(s) knew where they were? They were following them? But how much time and since when? The only possibility I guess is that someone knew where they were thru someone, that directly or indirectly gave the place where they were staying. So, the 3 phone calls are very important to know about it. The two FROM the babysitter obviously implies that Rose had told her before leaving where they would stay, so the planning was indeed thought beforehand, even if neither of the two had phoned to the motel to book a room. The other call they say it was from a third party (unknown). The police must have checked this, and if they say it was unknown, we must eliminate the motel's calls.

I had heard the two calls were TO the babysitter. Maybe one to and one from? By the way, I'm getting confirmation on this, but in my notes on this, I had written that Rose may have made a call from the hotel bar. I can't even remember where I got that, but I noted it for a reason and it would fit the scenario I've been playing out.

I went ahead and put together a timeline from my notes and I'll add a few details I haven't mentioned.

On September 6th, Charles Ray Hatcher escapes from a Missouri institution.

In the previous week leading up to the murders, Roger had been in Kahoke for work, installing telephone lines with a crew.

Sometime during the week, days before the murder, Rose met Roger in Kahoke. She had met him a month before and they were having a relationship. It is rumored that Roger was also seeing another girl and may have even been engaged to her. His ex-wife was aware of his infidelities. Roger was divorcing his wife, but not sure where they were in the process.

Ex-wife had been babysitting two children, a boy and a girl. They liked Roger better than the wife. She told them they would all go visit Roger in Kahoke over the weekend.

Roger finished working Friday. He had to be back to work on Monday. Rose was starting a new job Monday and would have to leave Sunday. They planned on going to a touristy Amish event in the Amana colonies for the weekend.

Rose picked Roger up and Roger left his work vehicle at the work site.

They check in around 7:40. There had been a last minute cancellation.

They ordered room service around 9:00. (Unclear if that's when it arrived or when it was ordered)

Someone moved the car around 9:30.

Their bodies are found at 1:00 pm the next day after they miss a 12:00 check out time.

Somewhere in this time, at least Rose was at the bar and had a confrontation with the bartender. A call may have been made.

In addition, 3 incoming or outgoing calls were made from the hotel. At least 1 was to the babysitter. Other sources say 2.

Rose was fully clothed. Roger was in his undershorts. Both were lying face down with numerous lacerations to the back of the head that were caused by a 3 inch blade--possibly a roofer's hatchet. The covers were pulled over the bodies after the murder. The word "This" was written on the bathroom door out of soap, but was part of a larger message, most of what had been scrubbed out and couldn't be read. Toothpaste was left in the sink and tub. Two chairs were pulled up to the side of the bed that Roger was on as if a conversation took place. The person in the further seat had been carving soap and smoking cigarettes.

A few months after the murder, Roger's ex was remarried. Roger had 2 insurance policies on him. The hotel was also sued for 3 million and settled out of court.

Later, one of the children the ex had been babysitting said that Roger's wife changed the plan to visit Roger and instead, they visited someone else and were taken shopping.


I would LOVE to know who was at the bar, when they were at the bar, what the confrontation was about, and if a phone call was made.

Also of note, the room they were in was on the 2nd floor in the corner. An easy escape was provided by simply exiting the room, going down the steps, and out the side door.
 
Thanks mcBrainder let's do it with questions:

September 6 (Saturday) - CRH escapes from a Missouri mental institution (Any data or info of his whereabouts from Sep 8-11?)
September 8-10 - Roger's working in Kahoka, MO. Someday around during this week he meets Rose in Kahoka. Roger has seeing another woman? (new to me - any info about this female person?) He was planning to divorce - (Any info that corroborates this?)
September 12 (Friday) - Rose picks Roger in Kahoka. They plan to go to the Amish convention in the Amana colonies (That's 5min today by car from the Amana colonies to the Amana-Inn hotel (US-151). They never went there didn't they? Roger left his own vehicle in Kahoka? They travel in Rose's car instead to 2211 U Avenue, Williamsburg, Iowa and check in at 17:40. Room service (dinner) at around 21:00. Rose or Roger are called to get the car from the handicap zone and one of them complies at approx 21:30.
September 13 (Saturday) - A cleaning lady find the bodies at 13:00 after they failed tho check-out at 12:00. (But they weren't supposed to leave Sunday?)

We can add other timelines later.
 
I do not find weird Roger being in his undershorts at all. After the room service he might felt comfortable and put himself like an "at home" situation (He was a man used to been with women) Rose might be more shy and stood with her clothes on or maybe she also put herself "at home" as Roger and flirted sometime until the call to remove the car from the handicap zone was placed. Maybe it was Rose (it was her car anyway) that went to remove the car from the handicap zone and, thus, got herself dressed again. Now, should we wonder the killer(s) were inside the room waiting for her to come or after? This question is also very important. I think, maybe, the killer(s) must have entered the room very soon after Rose came from the parking lot (and she didn't had the time to undress). The killer could also watched her removing the car and make the decision to go in soon afterwards. McBrainder, can you tell me everything about the issue at the bar and the bartender? That situation is still very unsketchy to me.
 
Let's talk about the murder weapon: The hatchet or the axe, the wounds and the position of the victims.

The weapon was never found, so we could not have any doubts that the killer took it with him. Now, what kind of weapon would someone to take to commit a murder and with the idea of bringing it back? A knife (best choice) but the killer seems to thought an axe sort of was better. Or did he have no choice to bring that particular type of tool instead of a knife? No doubt an axe is a more powerful fatal weapon than a knife. But a normal axe is a big tool, difficult to handle in a room (the room was indeed small) and problematic to hide if someone encountered the killer in the hall or any other place. It must have been a small axe or, as you say McBrainder, a roofer's hatch (small and easy to conceal). There's info about the conclusions of the autopsies that could firmly state the wounds were made by an axe-type weapon?

The position of the bodies. Very weird if someone sees that Roger seems to have tried to defend himself using his hands. What can we make of this? Roger and Rose were forced to lay down and be quite. The killer kills Rose first and Roger stays quietly lay down? (I think even the most coward man would have got off the bed or tried to run or even scream). If the killer went first at Roger, surely Rose would have screamed louder. Now, let's assume there were to killers. One for Rose and the other for Roger. Much cleaner and easier, no doubt there. Probably Roger, lying dowm, put his hands over his back head and the first strike cut his fingers off and cracked his skull, killing him instantly. The arms would fall either their side slowly before the second strike. I cannot possible imagine just one killer in the room (even under coercian) striking these blows without any of the victims triyng something or screaming... or did they scream but nobody heard them? They could not have been asleep (Rose's being dressed just doesn't make any sense). Now I can picture many parts of this tragedy and I am starting really to believe that Rose didn't had the chance to undress at all and that this crime must surely have been committed around 21:40 or 21:50 with them fully awake. That day there was a mortician convention. What the morticians were doing during that frame of time? A big Reunion in the hall or somewhere else? Was the meeting over already by that time? How much noise they were doing? Maybe the killer smiled before entering the room while hearing all that rackle and clatter happening downstairs... I think there was a lot clues and investigative work that could have been done in late 1980 by the Police, with the murder scene still going and all the witnesses fully aware and filled with fresh memories.
 
Thanks mcBrainder let's do it with questions:

September 6 (Saturday) - CRH escapes from a Missouri mental institution (Any data or info of his whereabouts from Sep 8-11?)

September 8-10 - Roger's working in Kahoka, MO. Someday around during this week he meets Rose in Kahoka. Roger has seeing another woman? (new to me - any info about this female person?) He was planning to divorce - (Any info that corroborates this?)

September 12 (Friday) - Rose picks Roger in Kahoka. They plan to go to the Amish convention in the Amana colonies (That's 5min today by car from the Amana colonies to the Amana-Inn hotel (US-151). They never went there didn't they? Roger left his own vehicle in Kahoka? They travel in Rose's car instead to 2211 U Avenue, Williamsburg, Iowa and check in at 17:40. Room service (dinner) at around 21:00. Rose or Roger are called to get the car from the handicap zone and one of them complies at approx 21:30.
September 13 (Saturday) - A cleaning lady find the bodies at 13:00 after they failed tho check-out at 12:00. (But they weren't supposed to leave Sunday?)

We can add other timelines later.

Nothing I could find on CRH about the days after his escape. Here's a good resource: http://maamodt.asp.radford.edu/Psyc 405/serial killers/Hatcher, Charles - fall, 2005.pdf

The divorce: This comes from the friend, who gets most of her info from the police and DCI agent working the case. When she told me, she said "supposedly he was..." Is that confirmation? Not really. Sounds like something she got from someone working the case.

That's a really good question about them checking out. My assumption is they were planning on moving on the next day after whatever event they were going to. Or maybe the hotel was booked the next night. They took Rose's car because they knew it wouldn't be recognizable like his car, which leads me to think they knew there was a possibility they'd been followed. I don't know how anyone could have known that, but it's what I was told.

I keep thinking that Roger and Rose knew the family was on to them and were taking precautions. If this is true, what if they saw that they were being followed? What if they only thought they did and were scared and paranoid about it? I'm really leaning toward Rose being in the hotel bar because Roger had her wait there while he talked to the brothers, maybe to convince them he was alone. I like your theory that Rose went out to the car and that's why she's dressed. Maybe they came in with her. The problem is that if the car movement is the moment they come face to face, it leaves out the bar encounter, which almost had to have come after the movement of the car, unless the bar was a short time period.
 
I do not find weird Roger being in his undershorts at all. After the room service he might felt comfortable and put himself like an "at home" situation (He was a man used to been with women) Rose might be more shy and stood with her clothes on or maybe she also put herself "at home" as Roger and flirted sometime until the call to remove the car from the handicap zone was placed. Maybe it was Rose (it was her car anyway) that went to remove the car from the handicap zone and, thus, got herself dressed again. Now, should we wonder the killer(s) were inside the room waiting for her to come or after? This question is also very important. I think, maybe, the killer(s) must have entered the room very soon after Rose came from the parking lot (and she didn't had the time to undress). The killer could also watched her removing the car and make the decision to go in soon afterwards. McBrainder, can you tell me everything about the issue at the bar and the bartender? That situation is still very unsketchy to me.

I agree that it's not that strange that Roger was in his undershorts, but it does lead to the fact that he was comfortable with whoever was in the room. Someone either let them in, or they came in with someone (which is perfectly plausible IMO), and that person would have likely been Rose, either after the bar or movement of the car. If they didn't come in with someone, someone let them in.

It's possible too that we're reading the bartender encounter as Rose going to the bar for an actual drink, when the truth could be that she was just looking for a hotel employee to help her out. If she suspected someone was watching or someone was in the room, then maybe she stopped at the bar for help instead of a drink. If a call was really made from the bar by Rose, that could support the hysteria theory.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
152
Guests online
3,418
Total visitors
3,570

Forum statistics

Threads
622,200
Messages
18,446,305
Members
239,941
Latest member
Mei Mei
Back
Top