So than what about the Sheriff saying "we searched thoroughly and I am 99% sure he is not up here"?
Was he wrong? Or do we all go to that 1%?
I believe the sheriff said "99% sure Deorr was at the campsite"; not in regard to if he wasn't up there.
So than what about the Sheriff saying "we searched thoroughly and I am 99% sure he is not up here"?
Was he wrong? Or do we all go to that 1%?
Regarding my long-winded post a few pages back. I understand why the Sherriff would have thought DeOrr had simply gotten lost. I even understand how it may have taken a period of time for him to consider the other possibilities. Not a few of us on here have said ourselves, who would go to a remote campsite to kidnap a child? I would be willing to bet that they have had similar missing children’s cases where the child wandered off and was found by SAR. I’m assuming they have not had any true stranger abduction kidnappings. The human brain goes to what it knows so I think it’s perfectly reasonable that the events panned out as they did.
My point was rather that some of us on here point out how the message has changed or things aren’t right. I think those inconsistencies can be accounted for by looking at the disappearance and investigation as a process that was constantly changing.
My belief is that DeOrr is somewhere up there in a crack or crevice and hasn’t been found. There are enough cases where searches were conducted and the bodies not found to later have it turn up in the same area.
Jesse Capen (a full grown adult male) wasn’t found for 4 years even though “In the past three years, hundreds of volunteers have scoured the desert looking for Capen’s remains.” This was in the dessert with little brush. How much smaller was DeOrr and how much more complicated is the geography of Idaho?
All MOO.
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_22314861/denver-mans-search-lost-dutchman-mine-likely-ended
Regarding my long-winded post a few pages back. I understand why the Sherriff would have thought DeOrr had simply gotten lost. I even understand how it may have taken a period of time for him to consider the other possibilities. Not a few of us on here have said ourselves, who would go to a remote campsite to kidnap a child? I would be willing to bet that they have had similar missing children’s cases where the child wandered off and was found by SAR. I’m assuming they have not had any true stranger abduction kidnappings. The human brain goes to what it knows so I think it’s perfectly reasonable that the events panned out as they did.
My point was rather that some of us on here point out how the message has changed or things aren’t right. I think those inconsistencies can be accounted for by looking at the disappearance and investigation as a process that was constantly changing.
My belief is that DeOrr is somewhere up there in a crack or crevice and hasn’t been found. There are enough cases where searches were conducted and the bodies not found to later have it turn up in the same area.
Jesse Capen (a full grown adult male) wasn’t found for 4 years even though “In the past three years, hundreds of volunteers have scoured the desert looking for Capen’s remains.” This was in the dessert with little brush. How much smaller was DeOrr and how much more complicated is the geography of Idaho?
All MOO.
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_22314861/denver-mans-search-lost-dutchman-mine-likely-ended
So than what about the Sheriff saying "we searched thoroughly and I am 99% sure he is not up here"?
Was he wrong? Or do we all go to that 1%?
MUCH smaller, and in CAMO! Great post!
That's where I'm at. I can't get past the chance of a mountain lion getting him.Ever since DeOrr's disappearance from a heavily forested area, every single time we drive somewhere I observe the wood lines that are so tightly planted with trees, shrubs, underbrush and the like on a "forest" floor thickly covered with leaves, sticks, pine needles, and the like, I just can't imagine HOW DeOrr could possibly be found. Unless everything was perfect so that a scent dog might have tracked him, in reality, I just don't expect that he would have been found. Mountain lions have a scent that dogs just naturally fear. Mountain lion urine must be used to train those dogs that hunt mountain lions. I just can't seem to get past DeOrr being taken by a Mountain Lion. To me it's the scenario that makes the most sense.
No. But I am on taptalk on my phone. Not sure what your useing but sometimes I would on my desktop.is anyone else getting a big popup survey window when on this site that obscures the posts?
is anyone else getting a big popup survey window when on this site that obscures the posts?
no it's about what internet company i use. i havent gotten it again...I'm not getting that on my iPad. Is it a WS survey?
How did 18 dogs fail to find a scent? I find this so troubling.
12:50
SB: Exactly! We had weve had a total of uh I believe 18 dogs in there and those dogs should have alerted, you know even after the fact, after the length of time that wed been looking should alert should that child be in there, but my two scent dogs that were in there initially, they should have found that child. They really should have.
Maybe just bad environmental conditions for following scents.
https://houndandthefound.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/how-scent-and-airflow-works/
The only problem I have with the mountain lion theory is lack of evidence.
No one found any blood. If we assume no one had eyes on Deorr for 20 minutes, that meant a mountain lion would have had 20 minutes to haul him off, consume him, and clean up any remaining blood, or hauled him off out of the search area and not caused any wounds big enough to cause bleeding. A toddler's skin would be quite delicate and easy to puncture. I just can't believe that a fresh attack wouldn't leave behind some evidence.