Kimmer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Messages
- 2,302
- Reaction score
- 5,439
So they could continue to get death benefits for Tylees fathers death and the same for JJ he was getting money from Charles murder. So with no kids to use the money on she had it all to herself and since she was not employed I'm guessing she had food stamps for both of them also.But why kill them? Why not just give them away? Abandon them? Anything? Why kill them, duct tape them and burn them? These are people who think that they are Christians?
<modsnip>I don’t know that it’s them that removed the memorial. But if it is they just don’t get it. Still. You’d think they’d show a little humility, horror and/or empathy. Anything other than annoyance at their inconvenience. And perhaps they have to those close to them. But we’ve never seen it. As far as I can recall, not even once. Save possibly for the remarks Garth made (while smiling) on moving day.
Even if they believe their father is 100% innocent it would not hurt anyone’s case to have them express horror that two innocent children lost their life and were savagely disposed of in the backyard of their very own childhood home. I like to think if Tammy were still alive she at least would display some humanity. I wonder if she’d be proud of them now.
ETA: I know several posters close to the family have asked that we be sympathetic and I get that this is hard for them. But come on, they don’t appear to even be trying to behave like they give a damn. Until they do or someone can explain why they don’t (other than this is upsetting them) my sympathy is reserved for victim family members that clearly care.
Last edited by a moderator: