- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
- Messages
- 11,289
- Reaction score
- 89,490
Snipped for focus**edit to add: this diminished responsibility as an act of religious womanhood is also on display with MG.
MP is a veritable paradigm of religious womanhood...inverted.
Snipped for focus**edit to add: this diminished responsibility as an act of religious womanhood is also on display with MG.
i think its lovely when miss, ma'am, ms, sir etc are used to speak to a person.
being affended by old fashioned curtesy and manners is ugly.
moo
A charm bracelet.I’m half expecting her to show up at her trial with her hair pinned back at the sides with twee honey bee barrettes. A string of pearls, too? No. Overkill.
Wasnt it in Hawaii the judge asked why she was in court in prison garb?
It can actually impede the right to a fair trial so I wouldn't categorize it as "ridiculous". Jmo
<Respectfully snipped for focus>
A friend of mine is a veterinarian. We were at brunch one Sunday and a rather obsequious server asked if she preferred Ms or Mrs.
She shut him up with, “Dr. is fine.”
Agree, that's what AxC's autopsy reports. As far as being closed, Gilbert LE have kept his investigation open. At least since this article from May, 8th.
Police in Gilbert, Arizona, say detectives investigating Cox's death will review the autopsy report and that the case is still active.
Lori Daybell's brother Alex Cox died 'of natural causes' autopsy finds
LVD and CD were not even in the mainland US at that time. We've talked this through ad nauseam, ad infinitum it seems. The Narcan was there because first responders found him unresponsive and administered it as a precaution, since they couldn't be sure he was NOT an overdose. But the ME report showed no opioids in his system. And his natural cause of death is supported by medical findings in his organs/body.
Janky as the timing looks, the only non-legit thing about his death IMO is the timing. This is why the word "coincidence" exists. AFAIK, the authorities consider his death a closed matter. I will be thrilled if they reopen it later on, but it seems really doubtful.
I agree. There are lots worse things to be called.i think its lovely when miss, ma'am, ms, sir etc are used to speak to a person.
being affended by old fashioned curtesy and manners is ugly.
moo
They were in a hurry for the same reason CD and LVD and MBP and IP were in a hurry.I sure wish we knew the backdrop of why AC and ZP were in a rush to marry, and why take on his wife's last name? Her past was certainly not good but can't sleuth her and post about it here I don't think.![]()
In some ways the cameras are a boon - Wood appears to spend most of the time looking at the defendant today.
Hmm. I stand (tentatively) corrected. I say tentatively because I'm not sure if the police would "report" closing the case.
The article you're referring to came out the same day the autopsy results were released, and the wording in the story was "Police in Gilbert, Arizona, say detectives investigating Cox's death will review the autopsy report and that the case is still active."
So, we'll see. I wonder if somebody could find out whether the case is still considered open or not (from GPD).
Right, there's no way this group just decided to up and move to Rexburg, Idaho on a lark, abandoning kids, family etc. , and/or just met on a whim and decided to marry. This was mission. These were the core members.They were in a hurry for the same reason CD and LVD and MBP and IP were in a hurry.
They were married couples so they could "gather" the 144, 000 followers.
All 3 marriages were rush, rush-In time for the ZP induced earthquakes and they could all magically disappear. JMO
I think he took her last name to keep him out of the spotlight or the search venues, as people might be looking for AxCox but his ID shows him as AxP, so if stopped and questioned, his ID does not match with who they would be looking for. IMO

Thank you! I’m glad you weighed in.Great post. Yes, indeed, a defendant's attorney is permitted to share any information felt useful for the preparation of the case (unless the judge rules specific material to be sealed or confidential). As you might expect, the constitution requires due process and fair trials so that has been liberally interpreted to mean lawyers can and should share everything. Most courts have a local rule prohibiting a witness from sitting in to hear testimony until they have testified. This is meant to prevent a witness from tailoring what he/she says to fit prior testimony. Many courts limit this to only expert witnesses and all courts can relax or waive that rule. In any case, a defendant is ALWAYS permitted to be present (and often is required to be present in criminal cases). Most certainly both Chad and Lori will be permitted to read testimony from any case relevant to theirs.
Since we're still not to the point that murder charges are filed we don't know if the state will choose to try them together. Most likely that will be the case (see, for instance, the Dan Markel murder trial in which Magbanua and Garcia were tried together). Assuming that is the case, the most challenging aspect here for the defense attorneys is the fact that there is so much horrendous evidence against both of them independently. Defending Lori would necessarily mean choosing whether to implicitly defend Chad or to try and implicate him. Similarly, defending Chad would mean making a corollary decision. What a nightmare to be defending Lori and know that all the evidence is going to come in as to Chad's misconduct. What a nightmare to be defending Chad and knowing what a horrible mother and liar Lori is and how much of it is on record. And we haven't even discussed the added complexity of Tammy and Charles very well being additional counts against one or both of them.
If I were a capital murder qualified defense attorney I would kill to get one of these cases. I'd approach it with the idea that avoiding the death penalty would be victory and I'd handle the case with that as my primary objective. Look at how Baez rode the publicity from Casey Anthony to then represent Aaron Hernandez. He's probably got feelers out to both families now and I wouldn't be surprised to see him eventually surface after murder charges are filed.
It's interesting that you assume that he lied. Sure, we can assume ill intent all day long on the part of our primary actors here in this case (CD, LVD), but it wouldn't occur to me to assume that Means was lying. He should have been prepared to answer this question more fully, and he should have qualified his response with more complete information, and not doing those things makes him sloppy. I just can't imagine that he would have had the temerity to lie to the court over something that could so easily be verified, as evidenced by Wood's subsequent objection.