I would say that 97% is a bit inflated. The demographics have changed a little more and we’re seeing more people who aren’t of LDS faith move to the area. There’s also a good amount of people who aren’t LDS that have lived here for awhile.
Scott Reisch was in Rexburg recently on his day off. After talking to people there he still maintains the view that an impartial jury could be found in the area, so the trial wouldn't need to be moved elsewhere.
I understand what you’re saying, but I definitely wouldn’t trust Wikipedia’s expertise here. It can be edited and changed by anyone.
What the hell does 'Honest treatment" mean, lol!
Just speculating that maybe he means he can be straightforward with his clients. But it does sound like odd phrasing imo.
How can Lori approve when she is not competant? MOO.
I’m not a lawyer so hoping one of the lawyers or law experts here will jump in. But it seems like a breach of trust. It also looked like he was trying to link the court filings to LVD case based on the picture and link placement.
Yes there is. And it’s painfully obvious MM also used this document to get leaks out to the public . Note the many items requesting interview information that have a sentence added at the end that provides a snippet of information regarding the interview topic. Note how many of those snippets contain info that either supports CV’s case, disparages the witness and/or disparage The State, RW and LE. Now note the requests that do NOT have a snippet sentence at the end. There are quite a few of them too so the snippet component isn’t part of some template. MM chooses when to add them or not.
Dunno. But if they are, no doubt Nate will blitz his site with related articles faster than we can read them.
I later checked and found that MM's list of complaints about the full discovery and the "explosive" sealed document likely aren't the same. The latter was brought up by Nate at the end of June while the discovery was given to the defense in mid-July.
His days on this case might be numbered, so he's trying to use his fame to become a media pundit. Judging by his SM, he definitely has a lot of opinions.
SBM. It has since become known that the prosecution's objection was indeed about MM. Regarding the conflict of interest, Lori Hellis states in her latest newsletter that a conflict of interest has nothing to do with attorney's qualifications but is related to their contact with individuals, their prior representation or ethical obligations. I still wonder what it is, if it's not prior representation of Chad.
