It's amazing what you can get away with when you say it came to you in a vision from a dead relative. Chad has been doing this all his life and writing about it and encouraging others to write about it.
Why would she need a protective vest in a court of law? Can members of the public bring weapons in? Surely they are searched and have to go through metal detectors? We do here in UK and we cannot even carry weapons. Even our bags are searched and we have to turn out our pockets.
she may have a protective vest on
Poor kid, imagine being so far away from home while all this is going on. It’s bad enough to loose your mum while your away but what’s followed is unimaginable. He’s probably going to be reading the news updates and wondering what the heck’s going onjmo
They were going as far as searching wallets
So why do you think I am giving too much credence to JR stories rather than Chad's or any other author's stories? I am trying to follow what you say and to make sense of it and that's why I question you. I am not LDS so it is much harder to understand this and what is acceptable LDS beliefs and what is OTT. JR and Chad were joined at the hip until she was ex'd IMO.
And his brother quit talking to him. But there are sheeple out there!
So why the need for a vest?
Don’t know. I’m guessing entry/exit.
And use your disappeared daughter's car in an assassination attempt out of State.
Probably don't need her in cuffs either, but together with the vest... hmmm still didn't humble her. Perhaps add a spit mask?
I agree with you; Chad, JR, HS and many other authors, podcast speakers and their hosts, last days chat room / newsletter subscribers and their hosts, and others who we aren’t mentioning here are mainly on the same page in extreme, non LDS beliefs that have a seed in actual Book of Revelations type teachings, and have gone off the deep end. Due to this, and the desire of many of those people to gather more people into their belief structure / pay for play business model, I don’t trust most of what they say, until it can be substantiated. There is plenty of actual, substantiated information for us to discuss and build upon to help find justice, rather than get lost in the rabbit holes of topics that are clearly against the TOS of this fine website. That is my point.
She may have had a credible threat against her and they’re ensuring that nothing happens on their watch. They may be doing it to play psychological games with her (let her know her life’s at risk and she’s not well liked atm-perhaps hoping that with a bit of fear she would talk). They may just be overly cautious because of the groups she was involved with. It’s a big case for a small town.
Another poster pointed this out earlier:
