- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 9,938
- Reaction score
- 80,580
Oh, yeah, missed that, sorry. Dunno how he'll get around that, but I suspect if it's in his interest he will.
New vision. More exaltation yadda yadda blah blah blah. Jmo
Oh, yeah, missed that, sorry. Dunno how he'll get around that, but I suspect if it's in his interest he will.
Well actually, she already had a family that she abandoned.
While I liked getting a few new details, the whole time I was reading these documents, I was thinking "How old are they" ??Justin Lum Fox 10 on Twitter
Justin Lum Fox 10 Phoenix
New documents from the child custody battle between Melani Pawlowski and Brandon Boudreaux reveal alleged details and a potential witness tied to Lori Vallow’s religious group. #fox10phoenix
I am interested in this bit when Smith speaks. Is this the lawyer?
Smith: Nate, let me modify this just a little bit. Part of the premise of what our clients are saying, including Melani and Ian here with us, but also Summer (Shiflet, Lori’s sister) and Janis (Cox, Lori’s mother) – the premise of it is, first and foremost, they don’t think they’ve ever seen anything in Lori’s life that would give them any evidence that she could harm her children.
The next level is that they know that Lori had a basis and a belief that she needed to take steps to protect her kids. We don’t have all the details about that, but she had expressed at least that much to them. They were moving out of the state of Arizona, they were going away, and she had a reason for doing that.
The third thing is that they had experienced in Lori’s life this notion that she has a substantial distrust of the system because of its failure in her ability to protect her own kids. The system never was able to help her do that – the judicial system.
So it’s hard to go into Lori and say, “Just tell us where the kids are” when it undermines everything that I just set forth. They don’t think she did anything to the kids. They know she’s got a basis for wanting to protect them. She knows they know that she doesn’t trust the system. And so to go in and ask her to tell them where the kids are would undermine her ultimate purpose – which is to protect the kids. Everybody wants that question asked because they just want to see when the kids are, but that’s not what Lori’s goal is here. Lori’s goal is to protect them and saying where they are doesn’t protect them."
So this is Lori's defence? Why isn't Means saying this rather than Smith? Lori cannot divulge where the kids are because she is protecting them. From Kay.
Just a thought. What if the death of SC (MBP’s mom) was a mercy killing? She was in Hospice end of life IIRC. Could as well have started an ease and justification for killing. Again, just a random thought.
Besides the fact that MP allegedly told her new husband that LVD and CD told her that Tylee and JJ had become zombies and were possessed.Do you think they would let a dark spirit (TR) take care of a light spirit (JJ) imo as to why I don't think Tylee is watching JJ
I suspect the insurance company screwed up. I posted a reference to the statute above.
shes as interesting as watching paint dry......**yawn
yet....the new husband is dull beyond comprehension.
so fishy they could even get excited enough to 'madly fall in love" in a few days and commit to marriage spontaneously
moo
Jackson Town Square has a Elk Antler Arch at each of the four entrances. A live feed webcam is present.
Do you think they would let a dark spirit (TR) take care of a light spirit (JJ) imo as to why I don't think Tylee is watching JJ
Good question I had forgotten where I heard that.Has anyone besides Melani brought up hospice? Why was she in hospice? Jmo
The Valley in Mesa AZ and what Mesa is famous for- INTERESTING**I'm so glad you brought this back up.. When it first came out, it absolutely sent chills up my spine. I don't believe they are hidden in whomever's house this might be, but whatever he was up to absolutely has to do with their disappearance IMO.
As far as your questions, my comments would be:
1. I don't think he has any relatives there, so anyone he was meeting would have to be podcast people or Lori's relatives.
2. IMO the only physical job he has done is gravedigger. I am sure the terrifying implications of that are evident.
3. It could be so many different places.. I'm hoping the possibilities have been thoroughly investigated.. We should brainstorm as well.
4. Again IMO I don't think this is the case (kids staying there), but whatever it was, they believed Chad needed to be there in person, to oversee it. Maybe not building something, but covering up something that was already there?
MOO.
I keep seeing posts about Lori and her family being if not solid LDS, at least generally accepted as "regular" LDS, the odd cult-thing notwithstanding.
But this bothers me. The foundation of the Church is the Articles of Faith that pretty much everyone can recite (or is that just me?)
Article #12 is: We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.
And yet everything that Lori and her family have done is counter that. The allegations of IRS issues, flaunting law enforcement, the comments that she sees or thinks herself to be above the law. There's almost an anti-government tone--at least that's my perception. And that's just not an attitude of LDS people, at least anyone I've grown up with or known.
I could totally imagine sitting next to TD in Relief Society. She came across as exactly who we are--family-oriented, good people. I can't even imagine running into Lori or most of her family in church--I think I'd sincerely wonder why they were there.
Totally my opinion, but I'm getting to where every time I see a post were someone is talking about Lori and her LDS beliefs I want to shout--not my people.
But.... Just WHO exactly is Lori supposedly "Protecting" them from?I am interested in this bit when Smith speaks. Is this the lawyer?
Smith: Nate, let me modify this just a little bit. Part of the premise of what our clients are saying, including Melani and Ian here with us, but also Summer (Shiflet, Lori’s sister) and Janis (Cox, Lori’s mother) – the premise of it is, first and foremost, they don’t think they’ve ever seen anything in Lori’s life that would give them any evidence that she could harm her children.
The next level is that they know that Lori had a basis and a belief that she needed to take steps to protect her kids. We don’t have all the details about that, but she had expressed at least that much to them. They were moving out of the state of Arizona, they were going away, and she had a reason for doing that.
The third thing is that they had experienced in Lori’s life this notion that she has a substantial distrust of the system because of its failure in her ability to protect her own kids. The system never was able to help her do that – the judicial system.
So it’s hard to go into Lori and say, “Just tell us where the kids are” when it undermines everything that I just set forth. They don’t think she did anything to the kids. They know she’s got a basis for wanting to protect them. She knows they know that she doesn’t trust the system. And so to go in and ask her to tell them where the kids are would undermine her ultimate purpose – which is to protect the kids. Everybody wants that question asked because they just want to see when the kids are, but that’s not what Lori’s goal is here. Lori’s goal is to protect them and saying where they are doesn’t protect them."
So this is Lori's defence? Why isn't Means saying this rather than Smith? Lori cannot divulge where the kids are because she is protecting them. From Kay.
And also moves into the same complex as Uncle Alex and her new husband and oh yeah, Chad Daybell lives in that town.I think that this friend was from Hawaii or Arizona, I don't recall which.
Obviously, this was not the same friend, that Melani was referring to. Melani claims that Lori told her that Tylee was hanging out with her "friends", which may or may not have been the truth. Either Lori told Melani that, and was straight up lying to her, or Melani is making this up to cover Lori.
I don't trust Melani at all, she claims that Lori had nothing to do with her moving to Rexburg, yet she manages to end up in the same complex as Lori and her new future husband. As if, this is some major coincidence.
MOO
But.... Just WHO exactly is Lori supposedly "Protecting" them from?
Tylee's dad is deceased
JJ's Dad Charles is deceased.
I guess that means the only ones left would be KAY and Larry
Is that what this is ??
Just a power struggle with Lori and Kay ? (Lori's ..not Kay's)
Is Lori trying to hold kids over Kay's head and have power and control by not letting Kay see JJ-- I mean, Lori already had her own brother kill Kay's brother Charles, JJ's dad/
Now she is keeping JJ away from Kay, taking away Kay's loved ones.
But.... Just WHO exactly is Lori supposedly "Protecting" them from?
Tylee's dad is deceased
JJ's Dad Charles is deceased.
I guess that means the only ones left would be KAY and Larry
Is that what this is ??
Just a power struggle with Lori and Kay ? (Lori's ..not Kay's)
Is Lori trying to hold kids over Kay's head and have power and control by not letting Kay see JJ-- I mean, Lori already had her own brother kill Kay's brother Charles, JJ's dad/
Now she is keeping JJ away from Kay, taking away Kay's loved ones.
Edit--IMO..it is something even worse than that though. But I do think she enjoys causing Kay pain which is horrible in itself
The Mesa temple has been closed for two years for renovations, but the Gilbert one is open and closest to where they used to live. (Chandler-Gilbert etc).The Valley in Mesa AZ and what Mesa is famous for- INTERESTING**
"The spectacular Mesa Arizona Temple dominates much of central Mesa, and one of the city's (admittedly few) iconic restaurants, The Landmark, is in a building that began life as a Mormon church.
While looking, I noticed there are about 20 LDS churches along with the temple in that area.
( I did NOT highlight or Bold type, it copied and pasted that way it wont let me change it)*
View attachment 246828