nursebeeme
Registered User
- Joined
- May 3, 2008
- Messages
- 53,158
- Reaction score
- 229
until we know more... we just don't know HOW LONG the body has been in the water
Welcome to WS, Staci~ Thanks for the information since what we are seeing here is conflicted. It is important to know if he could have gone in near the apartment or not. It could lend itself to an accidental drowning theory for the defense of someone should they be arrested.don't know if I am reposting this but this is a link that states it's not possible for the body to float all the way down! I am a watermaster for a irragation line and I know we have big grates to stop things from going down!
http://www.ktvb.com/news/localnews/stories/ktvbn-aug0309-kuna_canal_body.a50d15f2.html thanks, Staci
I hope it doesn't get lost in a murder investigation that they dropped the ball on searching the canal. Someone should take responsibility for that decision and be fired, imo. If this was ruled out last week as a possible search location...look at the time, effort, and money wasted searching other areas.*That* is very troubling, to me, SS!WTH is going on??
Something here is seriously not adding up. We assume that this child has gone missing due to 'injury or a tragic event' as per BPD. They apparently seize all sorts of evidence from the home of MJ in uhaul trucks, and now there is this mysterious little body that's turned up in water adjacent to a canal that runs (it's my understanding) a half a mile behind MJ's apartment. Without the criminal records and the 'possible tragic event' revelation, this looks a whole lot like a curious little boy who MAY HAVE wandered off or just 'vanished.'
I'm not saying that they're innocent. I'm not saying that they're guilty either. I'm going to have to ride the fence on this one because something in all of this is just really strange.
It sure looks like it IS in fact a 'tragic event' (as in an accidental drowning) OR it looks as though someone worked pretty hard to stage this scene and to make it look like he wandered off and drowned. Doesn't it, or is it just my overactive imagination?
I am not ready to point fingers at LE. They have been very tight lipped in this case regarding the evidence they found early on... we just don't know if they REALLY ruled out the canal or if they did why they did.. I think they have done a great job in this case considering the degree to which they have been able to keep the lid on everything including people speaking to the media. The things the media have gotten are very, very minimal and so I think there is a lot of speculation going on for their part. Imhoo...I hope it doesn't get lost in a murder investigation that they dropped the ball on searching the canal. Someone should take responsibility for that decision and be fired, imo. If this was ruled out last week as a possible search location...look at the time, effort, and money wasted searching other areas.
I am just going to have to wait and see what LE & the ME says. A little boy wandering off and accidently falling into a canal and drowning would not have left blood evidence in the apartment, IMO, unless he was injured first. A large amount of blood would not be logical.
I just have a feeling that the COD will not be drowning, MOO. We will find out in time whether Robert's lungs contained any water indicative of drowning.
I am now going to get my horse out from behind my cart in that I am beginning to get the cart in front of the horse. I am jumping the gun here.