Two jurors say Daniel Ehrlick was convicted by his own words
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/...-by-his-own-words.html#storylink=omni_popular
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/...-by-his-own-words.html#storylink=omni_popular
Yes it was Friday evening. I think that is the point prosecution was trying to make about the oatmeal that was found in his stomach.Was that Friday evening the girl was with Robert? Daniel said he cooked supper and Robert was gone when he called him in to eat. So if Robert ate oatmeal for lunch there shouldn't have been any oatmeal found in his stomach.
Then why would she have taken the plea deal for up to 25 years? Especially knowing that Daniel was going to trial. If they were both innocent then I think its possible attorneys for both sides would have worked together to prove it and she wouldn't have taken a deal. Remember because Gus Cayhill is a public defender the state would have had to hire her an outside attorney because of the conflict of interest. Not sure who her attorney is, but its not likely a run of the mill public defender.The true reason Jenkins cant say who she aided and abetted is because she didnt IMO.
Again I ask off all those kids that live at that apartment complex why Robert? There are tons of attractive kids there including other little boys. You mentioned him being approached outside when he was alone. Keep in mind again the size of this complex and the amount of people running around. 1)someone would have seen something and 2) nobody is ever alone around there on a hot summer day or evening. I can't tell you how many times my 12 year old who only goes over there a few weeks in the summer time tells me how she knows everyone there and everyone knows everyone. Even me who spends no real time over there recognized so many names that testified from there just from hearing them through my family.Here is what I believe happened to Robert. Robert was an attractive and outgoing boy and Friday evening when he was outside alone, a male SO approached Robert and convinced him to come for a ride in his truck. Robert went willingly and his captor took Robert to his place where he lived alone in a neighboring community so he could party with him and do as he pleased over the weekend. If this person had a job to return to on Monday he likely wanted to dispose of his body Sunday evening because he realized if he left Robert alone during the day while he was at work, he would escape and Robert would be able to identify him. To solve his problem, he took Robert to the canal Sunday evening and drowned him.
Robert was 8 years old and his captor realized if he released Robert he would be found and persecuted so this is why he murdered Robert.
A boy near Roberts age testified during Ehrlicks trial so why didnt the Defense find a way for the girl who was with Robert Friday evening around 7 pm to also?
Ehrlicks attorney failed to uncover pertinent facts from Ehrlick while he was on the stand. Ehrlick should have been asked to talk about any and all of the injuries Robert got through playing sports and what Robert ate at meal times and for snacks throughout the day.
I think Ehrlicks past criminal history was irrelevant to this case and should not have been allowed in. He did not commit a crime while the baby was in his custody because he was his primary caregiver and he was deeply invested in his childs future yet his attorney never impressed this upon the jury during his closing arguments. According to Ehrlick he didnt finish his parenting classes because he had to leave the child with a licensed babysitter and he didnt have one. Because the caseworker failed to state this on the stand she mislead the jury into believing Ehrlick acted irresponsibly. Ehrlicks attorney knew why Ehrlick didnt finish the classes so he should have had the caseworker admit the truth during cross-examination.
Mistakes commonly occur in the medical and legal professions and reports are falsified.
Many parents are falsely accused and convicted for injuring their child when it was actually a medical condition that caused their death. All babies have a soft spot on their heads so it is possible hypothetically that Jenkins was falsely accused and convicted for hurting her infant. A nurse testified that parents who abuse their children dont seek medical help and if that is true, why did Jenkins take her baby to the hospital? The soft spot on a babys head occurs from travelling down the birth canal AFAIK so if the baby was born as a result of a natural child birth, it is possible Jenkins didnt intentionally injure her son and Jenkins pled guilty because she didnt know this or she didnt know how to apply this information to argue the case the state brought against her and neither did her lawyer.
Most people cant understand medical and legal terminology and feel lost so they let others who know better make decisions for them. I suspect this was the case with Jenkins and Ehrlick.
IMO the ways in which Robert was disciplined do not rise to the level of torture and Jenkins isnt guilty of aiding and abetting Ehrlick because he isnt responsible for Roberts death.
There was talk the police found a large quantity of Robert's blood splattered throughout the apartment and this information would definitely stop people from calling in tips and pursuring other leads.
As the grandparents of Robert Manwill, we want to thank the community of Boise for the love, care and support you have shown our family over the past two years since the passing of our dear grandson, Robert. We, too, have wanted justice for Robert and believe that the Sept. 2 sentences are the first step in that process. This has been a very difficult time for our family. As you might imagine, no one ever wants to think that their own family member is involved in something as horrendous as this. We will not offer excuses for Melissa, and we are so sorry in many, many different ways. We, too, want answers to the same questions that many of you are asking.
Read more: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2011/09/18/1803381/as-a-community-we-can-prevent.html#ixzz1YKYLexHX
Thank you for posting this article. I had missed it. Really good information and food for thought.