If Burke's voice really is on the tape of the 911 call, what is the worst possible interpretation for it?
It was cold outside and latching it would be a typical thing to do when shutting a window?If the window was found open by JR, why would he close and latch the window?
Some people think before reacting to their first impressions?Finally, if, as he would claim years later, it was his “first impression that the kidnapper had gone through that window,” why would he not call everyone in the house downstairs to point out this vitally important discovery?
If he took a moment to pause to think about the window, that may be the moment he remembered he broke it the summer before?JR’s recollection of the window and the importance ascribed to it seems to increase over time.
Well, there are two interpretations as I see it. One is that he heard all the commotion with his parents- he admitted to actually being awake when his parents thought he was asleep and told LE he heard loud talking and hurried walking around. He got out of bed and walked into the kitchen as they were making the call and heard his mother on the phone.
The WORST was that he was involved in JB's injury/death and his words "Please, what do I do?" may be ominous in that regard.
If Burke's voice really is on the tape of the 911 call, what is the worst possible interpretation for it?
Is it another possible implication that they lied?
Is it another possible implication that they lied?
That is ALWAYS a possibility in this case.
On a related matter- I recall reading somewhere a while back some comments by JR admitting that BR had in fact, been awake at that time, but they felt it best to say he was asleep to leave him out of it. Does anyone else recall this?
I do. If memory serves, that was with their interview with the National Enquirer.
Oh well, that'd be right then wouldn't it?
Oh well, that'd be right then wouldn't it?
Didn't the National Enquirer just win some sort of a journalism prize?
Hey- the mainstream media prints fiction, too.
Tell that to John and Elizabeth Edwards! (Oh, I just HAD to do that!)
Remember old William H. Hearst? Remember "yellow journalism" and the beginning of the Spanish American War? These south-bound ends of north-bound horses have been in the racket of molding public opinion for decades. Nothing new here, except the subject matter exploited and the targets of assassination.
Free press? Free to steal fortunes from "the truth" and defenseless pukes who didn't have the resources or the savvy to fight a decadent Goliath. The Ramseys, they discovered to their dismay, had both and more.
Quite so, Fang. Beats the alternative to a pulp, though.
Quite frankly, Fang, the Ramseys' approach to "fighting" scares me more than an out-of-control press does. Their way has been nothing but fear and threats.
The alternatives do not necessarily equal state-controlled, pinko, commie rags or other manufactured folly.
Let them camp out on your doorstep, your office, your favorite restaurant, the garbage dump, 24/7, and pay, bribe others to confirm lies about you, then tell us you prefer their tactics.
Well, that's the alternative I was thinking of. But if you find my thinking too dichotomous, please feel free to enlighten me. Keep in mind that I've been reading 1984, too.
I didn't say I did. I just prefer a free press as opposed what some (like the Rs) have in mind.
Like what?
If my daughter was found as Joni was, and the cops implicated I was involved, I would not be able to restrain my rage.
I agree.
Knowing that my rage might not further JBR's interest, I might instead circumvent LE, hire my own investigators, place ads in the newspaper, and go on national TV.
Hmmm.
You are a better man than me. More like JR, perhaps?