- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 94,690
- Reaction score
- 323,013
Thank you very much for this update @imstilla.grandma & for tagging me! 

Thanks @Niner. This case still stinks to me.
Sorry Niner, I tried but can't help on this one.Just a bump up - was wondering what might have happened to the case against Katrina? I have her last hearing on Jan. 8, 2021.
@MsMarple ? TIA!![]()
Just a bump up - was wondering what might have happened to the case against Katrina? I have her last hearing on Jan. 8, 2021.
@MsMarple ? TIA!![]()
Lilibet said:snipped by me...
Did her case have anything to do with violating a gag order in place after she was interviewed on CBS? Or did we ever know what protective order she had violated?
To my knowledge - I believe she tried to talk with her son - which was against the gag order. I "could" be wrong though....
She should be arrested if she tries to contact that poor child again. She his his biggest threat. I also have way more suspicions abut HER involvement in that fire than his.Thanks. I wondered if she had talked to the press again, but didn’t find anything. So you’re probably right about her trying to talk to her son. Her interview was disgusting and handed the prosecutor added info for his case against her son on a silver platter, in addition to publicly identifying him.![]()
She should be arrested if she tries to contact that poor child again. She his his biggest threat. I also have way more suspicions abut HER involvement in that fire than his.
That's why she is always talking about his 'faults' and his issues because she wants the spotlight to be on him instead of her. I sure hope the defense attorney can get the judge to privately view all those old videos this sweet boy made at home. It may give the judge some important background information.
Snipped by me. It may not be a violation of his constitutional rights, but to charge a nine year old with murder is a violation of his human rights IMO.The judge asked Dluski to focus his arguments for a continuance on specific allegations of violations of the child’s constitutional rights.
Yes, sounds like you saw his you tubes. He is young and naive, but very well meaning and enthusiastic. She is high, sarcastic and lazy. JMOIs this the case where the mom was clearly high as a kite in her son's YouTube videos?