- Joined
- Jun 5, 2015
- Messages
- 2,883
- Reaction score
- 18,600
I fully understand how sources work—I think I should have phrased my question more clearly!^^bbm
The bankruptcy filing was referenced by the quoted MSM because this was the source used to cite Chemi-Flex and Euclid Beverage as their employers.
However, US Bankruptcy records are public information, and generally, cases filed as long as 10 years ago are easily accessible (i.e., anyone may call the court and verify if you have filed bankruptcy).
Actually, it's very much possible that the couple was no longer employed by the firms reported above and that they had different jobs/employers closer to their residence. MOO
I meant to ask why a reporter would need to rely on bankruptcy filings in order to verify a pretty basic piece of personal information about the two deceased victims. Although I personally feel that filing for bankruptcy is not a shameful thing, I believe many other people feel quite differently, and even look at it as a moral failing of some sort. I also feel that even a merely competent reporter could have identified another source for the names of AR‘s and ZB’s employers, and need not have referenced the couple‘s (previous? current?) financial struggles at all.