I tend to try not to get to wrapped up in the "name game". LS, ST, LA, MT and so on. All these people in their own way willingly or unwillingly are part of the cover up. People like MT are valued because they continue to look for the "patsy" (no pun intented) the so called "crazed pedophile" intruder type. The, if you will, Lee Oswald of the JBR case. People like ST are valued because they keep the heat on the R's. This works out well for those who never want to see this case in a court of law.
Onward:
You have to go no further than page one to see this reporter is no reporter. He has is bias opinion and has no problem letting us know.
"Tracey has a dismal track record as a Ramsey sleuth. He's been barking up the wrong tree for years, serving up one implausible suspect after another"
Let me also mention his Fleet White reference.
"Fleet White Jr., a former friend of the Ramseys who'd split with them shortly after the murder, was even more incensed. He and his wife Priscilla wrote to the CU Board of Regents, questioning Tracey's competence and demanding an investigation." ..."they wrote. "Mr. Tracey was attempting to deflect suspicion from the Ramseys on the eve of the grand jury investigation."
I don't trust FW for reasons many of you already are aware of. I see no reason to portray him as a "crusader" of some sort. In fact it seems he is/was a leading RDI propagandist. With friends like this........I'd run from Boulder to.
Onward
"Gigax offered to send Bennett sales receipts that proved he was in Indiana over Christmas 1996. He also had a dozen witnesses who'd seen him there on Christmas Day. As he sees it, the film mangles basic facts about him, his whereabouts and his criminal record to make him fit the part of a crazed ninja-stalker killer. Calling him a "convicted pedophile" is a bit misleading: After what he describes as a drunken and unconsummated encounter with a teenage babysitter 21 years ago, he was convicted of attempted sexual assault and served less than two years. Yes, he pleaded guilty in 1996 to a menacing charge over a fight in his trailer that ended with the stabbing of a neighbor, but he received probation and arranged to complete it in Indiana."
Ah the poor misunderstood Mr. Gigax. How nice of him to OFFER to show those receipts to Mr. Bennett. Did Mr. Bennett take him up on that? We don't know because Mr. Prendergast doesn't care. There seems to be no attempt to get the "babysitters" version of the story. That nasty stabbing incident? Obviously the neighbor's fault. Maybe he does fit the part Mr. Prendergast. Yet a man with no criminal history, who no one can prove or even suggest he ever hurt anyone and heads a multi-national corperation worth millions of dollars is his prime suspect.
