Found Deceased IN - Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #156

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's what I thought I read shortly after his arrest, that he spoke to LE on the 13th, in the general area of the search. (Just letting them know that he'd been there earlier and didn't see anything unusual.) That's a little concerning due to the timeframe. So, we're to believe that he committed the murders, left, cleaned up, and circled back to the search area before they suspended it on the 13th?
Imagine if the search dogs had not been called off that night and had found the girls that night. I wonder then if they would’ve continued on following the scent directly to the house of the man accused of killing them if their scent was on him at all.
 
Last edited:
The only thing I can think of is that he feared he’d been seen, or that he’d left shoe prints, and he was being preemptively self-protective. (ie, “oh, yeah, that was the nice guy who came forward to let us know he was there”.)
Dear @SMK777,

Great post!

Am I the only one who is wondering which witness said "definitely not blue eyes"?

I can't wait to hear the answer on this one - if it was R.A. who said this. I have no idea of course who said it.


Just my thoughts, opinions, questions.
 
Video which @JnRyan posted:




At 38:25 Video Time
Robert Ives says:


"People were really trying and there was a lot of great information that came in. I mean, I took some of those calls myself.

They were so busy early on, I actually manned the phones one day.

Eventually they moved it to the F.B.I. Call Centre. But at one point we were just running a Call Centre ourselves.

And we had lots of volunteers. They tended to be jailers or dispatchers and people who were used to taking these sort of phone calls.

And early in the morning, or at some particular hour, we'd only have one person and there'd be three phones ringing. So I'd just answer the phone."
Quote by R. Ives


JMO
 
Yeah same here! the whole conservation officer story is just bizarre!

As to whether RA talked to this officer on the 13th, I also read that date as ref to the girls’ murder rather than RA’s tipping himself in… cuz on the 13th the girls were merely “missing.” If the date given was meant to fix RA’s appearance in the crime timeline, it wouldn’t really be accurate to phrase it as it was. Imo

But then on the other hand if RA tipped himself in while the girls were missing but before they were found - much easier to imagine LE paying little attention & just letting him go! They didn’t even know for sure they had a crime yet so weren’t looking for a perp.
JMO
Speculating...Perhaps the conservation officer didn't know RA and didn't get a name when they spoke because it was prior to the girls being found? The officer, and all others, were intently involved in a search for lost or injured children, not a killer. The conservation officer then gave the physical description of RA to LE at a later time, which became part of the sketch of OBG. Again pure speculation on my part.
 
Imagine if the search dogs had not been called off that night and had found the girls that night. I wonder then if they would’ve continued on following the scent directly to the house of the man accused of killing them if their scent was on him at all.
If he had no blood on him and used something to get rid of DNA at the crime scene, possibly, the scent could have been lost. If he crossed the River back, the scent could have been lost.
 

BBM. I can't help but think Carter is referencing the forgotten statement article.

"That led to a discussion about the reporting since the announcement of Richard Allen’s arrest. Several news outlets have published articles about the Delphi murders investigation, citing anonymous sources and even “police sources.” Whether or not those stories turn out to be true, time will tell. But at this moment in time, it’s frustrating for Carter."

"So, whoever this ‘source’ is, I doubt very seriously that individual is a part of the core team.

“This case is unlikely any that I’ve seen in an almost 40-year career,” Superintendent Carter tells WIBC’s Hammer & Nigel, “there are so many different tentacles to this. Its very complex.”
 
Last edited:
G
I wonder if the witness saw him again and recognised him?
Thank you, see, this is the kind of very basic question I like and am eager to know if there is an answer. Did witnesses AGAIN see/recognize and report the persons they saw on the trails on Feb. 13?

We don’t know but it’s a fundamental question.
 
I wonder the conservation officer dropped the ball? Maybe wrote something that BG said he was on the trail the day before or the day after?

You know, humans are flawed and do make mistakes.

The "fact" that he told a conservation officer and not an official member of LE was actually pretty clever in that respect
 
I was reading an article about the UVA student murders & this stood out to me (BBM):
The suspect, a former football player, appeared by video link from a local jail for Wednesday's court hearing. He did not enter a plea to the numerous charges he faces and said he plans to hire an attorney. A judge ordered him held without bond and appointed a public defender to represent him until he secures private counsel.

And that goes back to what I said earlier in this discussion about RA. These families, friends & the community have waited for an arrest for over five years. This case, imo, is a big deal.

Even though RA indicated early on that he would secure his own attorney, Indiana laws say:
Courts may appoint counsel in other cases if the court determines that the interests of justice demand such an appointment.

I would think that surely, if any case needs it, this one does. Why did the initial judge not appoint RA counsel until he had secured his own? (Which we now know he wasn't able to do & requested court-appointed counsel anyway.) RA went without counsel for many days (can't remember how many offhand but it was more than a week), was transferred between prisons, etc. In order to provide justice, RA should have had counsel by his side from day one. Imo.

I really don't want a technicality like this to weaken the case but I think the defense will have some valid points to raise about possible questionable actions by the court like letting an accused murdered in a high-profile case to go without counsel for so long.

I remain shocked the court was so lax about it.

MOO.

I added hyperlinks above but am also linking the referenced websites here:


 
I was reading an article about the UVA student murders & this stood out to me (BBM):


And that goes back to what I said earlier in this discussion about RA. These families, friends & the community have waited for an arrest for over five years. This case, imo, is a big deal.

Even though RA indicated early on that he would secure his own attorney, Indiana laws say:


I would think that surely, if any case needs it, this one does. Why did the initial judge not appoint RA counsel until he had secured his own? (Which we now know he wasn't able to do & requested court-appointed counsel anyway.) RA went without counsel for many days (can't remember how many offhand but it was more than a week), was transferred between prisons, etc. In order to provide justice, RA should have had counsel by his side from day one. Imo.

I really don't want a technicality like this to weaken the case but I think the defense will have some valid points to raise about possible questionable actions by the court like letting an accused murdered in a high-profile case to go without counsel for so long.

I remain shocked the court was so lax about it.

MOO.

I added hyperlinks above but am also linking the referenced websites here:


I do think this is comparing apples to oranges, to a certain extent. We don't have a lot of details on either case. State laws and the preference for the judge can effect how these things are handled; the arrested individual's state of mind can also come into play. For all we know, someone could have represented RA on that day in court, but was never officially assigned to his case (happens all the time). RA could have refused counsel that day and stated he would find his own attorney.
 

BBM. I can't help but think Carter is referencing the forgotten statement article.

"That led to a discussion about the reporting since the announcement of Richard Allen’s arrest. Several news outlets have published articles about the Delphi murders investigation, citing anonymous sources and even “police sources.” Whether or not those stories turn out to be true, time will tell. But at this moment in time, it’s frustrating for Carter."

"So, whoever this ‘source’ is, I doubt very seriously that individual is a part of the core team.

“This case is unlikely any that I’ve seen in an almost 40-year career,” Superintendent Carter tells WIBC’s Hammer & Nigel, “there are so many different tentacles to this. Its very complex.”
This line jumped out at me:

“This case is unlikely any that I’ve seen in an almost 40-year career, Superintendent Carter tells WIBC’s Hammer & Nigel, “there are so many different tentacles to this. Its very complex.”

Why would DC describe the murder case like this, with "different tentacles," if it was as simple as a random psychopath came across two girls, saw his opportunity, and took it? This case has long been described as complex, but I don't think it's just because LE didn't know who the killer was. Maybe the fact that L was likely being catfished, as well, played into the complexity, but that would only be if LE didn't know if it was linked to the murders or not. Now that they've arrested RA, what keeps this so complex?
 
Last edited:
It's not to people who have family members with hazel eyes - the people that you want to recognize and report on your suspect.

In my experience. MOO
MOO, well RA has blue eyes, so if the murderer was accurately described as "not having blue eyes", then RA is obviously the wrong guy. It will be interesting to see what actual evidence they have on him (if they ever unseal the search warrant.) MOO
 
This line jumped out at me:

“This case is unlikely any that I’ve seen in an almost 40-year career, Superintendent Carter tells WIBC’s Hammer & Nigel, “there are so many different tentacles to this. Its very complex.”

Why would DC describe the murder case like this, with "different tentacles," if it was as simple as a random psychopath came across two girls, saw his opportunity, and took it? This case has long been described as complex, but I don't think it's just because LE didn't know who the killer was. Maybe the fact that L was likely being catfished, as well, played into the complexity, but that would only be if LE didn't know if it was linked to the murders or not. Now that they've arrested RA, what keeps this so complex?
I bolded your last sentence. It must have to do with KAK I think? Even if RA is a random find and not directly from the KAK investigation, the search for a connection could still be going on. LE *really* thought KAK was connected to make the Anthony Shots announcement and link the tip line and search the river for 5 weeks in August. I don't doubt with RA in custody they are working backwards to connect the dots if they can!

Maybe another tentacle could be the investigation into RA and any past crimes?

I am also so curious!
 
Thoughts on "different tentacles."

- anthony_shots communicated with victims on day of murder, planning to meet
- LE knows multiple people (at least 2, e.g., KAK + his father) have access to that account
- however, apparently KAK is NOT the killer
- Ron Logan created an alibi about his whereabouts at the time of murder, but was cleared after search
- RA is somehow the prime suspect / killer
- 2 different sketches of a suspect, looking completely different

These are just a few examples of tentacles that needed to be investigated. Extremely bizarre case.
 
Background on Allen's attorneys:

Sounds like the prosecution will be kept on their toes. JMO
 
Background on Allen's attorneys:

Reading this makes me more aware of how much serious crime there is. Don’t want to assume guilt on anyones’s part. Maybe this is the reminder I need that everyone is assumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I would like to begin following Andrew Baldwin’s cases to see how he represents clients. Thank you @MassGuy for posting this article.
 
<modsnip - quoted post was removed/off topic>

And given how subjectively eye color Is perceived and described, it was, IMO, irresponsible of LE to pass along, with what seemed a stress on the “not blue”, witness description.

Many of us assumed that DNA must have been a factor in ruling out blue eyes, despite LE attributing it to a witness. It came off as decidedly NOT BLUE.

I just think that LE should have been more careful in the way they shared eyewitness accounts with the public, given that they would KNOW how hard eye color is to accurately describe.

Makes you wonder if there were folks who thought about calling in RA, but reconsidered due to those sketches and the “not blue eyes”.

JMHO
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
819
Total visitors
975

Forum statistics

Threads
626,075
Messages
18,520,229
Members
240,933
Latest member
nifemibosun
Back
Top