- Joined
- Oct 12, 2022
- Messages
- 264
- Reaction score
- 2,085
... and then complain about "Internet people" ruining their work.It’s just bizarre. Why would the prosecution use an online petition as a reason to keep the PCA sealed?
... and then complain about "Internet people" ruining their work.It’s just bizarre. Why would the prosecution use an online petition as a reason to keep the PCA sealed?
MOO The KAK speculation has been ongoing for years, it's been almost 6 years since his catfishing was discovered and he has been in jail for 2.5 years. Many thought he or his father was BG, there are countless theories on his level of involvement. Now the last hope of KAK being involved is resting on this vague reason given by the prosecution, which is just a part of the asking for the sealing. In my opinion, neither the prosecution or LE has suggested, since RA's arrest, that KAK is involved. As DC said, "We have our man".One such compelling reason would be other suspects which is probably where the KAK speculation has entered the picture.
We know it’s possible for females to be involved in everything from sex-abuse to murder. But I’m assuming male.Do we think the additional involved parties are male or female?
They don’t appear to be on top of their game.It’s just bizarre. Why would the prosecution use an online petition as a reason to keep the PCA sealed? The argument should be made on the contents of the affidavit and the law, not an online petition signed by thousands of people who have no idea what the affidavit contains. Not getting the warm and fuzzies about the prosecution, seems they are in over their heads.
how can we be sure though at this point the only person who had to approve it was a judge that has since shown himself to be unqualified and unprofessional. Hopefully you are right, but i think some level of skepticism is justified here.I don't think LE would have been allowed to press ahead with charges etc if they were not confident and concrete in regards to what they have on RA. His defence also can't come out and say anything else in regards to his innocence, they have their own job to do in this. That said, I really really hope the case against RA is both correct and watertight.
MOO The PC must show that there is evidence that the arrested person committed that specific crime. It may be bare bones but it must be compelling for a judge to accept it. A PC statement/the filing of charges also implies that there is enough existing evidence to likely convince a jury of guilt. MOOBut the charge is felony murder so in reality all the affidavit has to do is create probably cause to arrest fir felony murder (death during commission of felony - ie kidnapping or SA etc) so I think the PC affidavit is probably pretty bare bones.
Kitchen sink reasoning. MOOIt’s just bizarre. Why would the prosecution use an online petition as a reason to keep the PCA sealed? The argument should be made on the contents of the affidavit and the law, not an online petition signed by thousands of people who have no idea what the affidavit contains. Not getting the warm and fuzzies about the prosecution, seems they are in over their heads.
Wasn’t picked up that we know of. Any chance that “guys” and “down the hill” are two different people? Wouldn’t that be a twist??If there was indeed more than one participant in these murders, I wonder if RA's reaction is sincere in the sense that he didn't commit the actual act, but was present when it happened. JMO
Also if there was more than one participant at the crime scene I wonder how their voice wasn't also picked up on Libby's phone.
MOO The KAK speculation has been ongoing for years, it's been almost 6 years since his catfishing was discovered and he has been in jail for 2.5 years. Many thought he or his father was BG, there are countless theories on his level of involvement. Now the last hope of KAK being involved is resting on this vague reason given by the prosecution, which is just a part of the asking for the sealing. In my opinion, neither the prosecution or LE has suggested, since RA's arrest, that KAK is involved. As DC said, "We have our man".
A valid reason would be other "suspects" that they are actually working on. And the prosecutor/judge would know if that was true or not, I hope. But the reason given is "there could be others involved", not suspects. Do they want it sealed until the calls to the tip line stop? MOO
Or digital information. The 'DNA' of the internet.If it is KAK, surely DNA would already have connected him? If there is - as LEA says - perp DNA at the scene. Idk.
Doug Carter specifically said in the 2019 presser that the person talking in the audio is one person. Unless that perspective has now changed and we just don't know about it.Wasn’t picked up that we know of. Any chance that “guys” and “down the hill” are two different people? Wouldn’t that be a twist??
Perhaps they didn't speak or couldn't be picked up from a distance by her phone.If there was indeed more than one participant in these murders, I wonder if RA's reaction is sincere in the sense that he didn't commit the actual act, but was present when it happened. JMO
Also if there was more than one participant at the crime scene I wonder how their voice wasn't also picked up on Libby's phone.
Male. Although females have been known to do 'bad stuff' too... my vote goes for male, not female.Do we think the additional involved parties are male or female?
Being involved doesn't have to mean in the actual killings imo. Could be providing a getaway, helping destroy evidence, even in the planning of it. Could be something along those lines.If there was indeed more than one participant in these murders, I wonder if RA's reaction is sincere in the sense that he didn't commit the actual act, but was present when it happened. JMO
Also if there was more than one participant at the crime scene I wonder how their voice wasn't also picked up on Libby's phone.
Most respectfully stepped by me, for focus:I know it's skipped over but I thought the first defense lawyer made a good point. He said his client said he's innocent, the PCA did not convince him otherwise, so he believes his client is innocent and will wait for the discovery. He said they did not see discovery from the state yet.
Do we think the additional involved parties are male or female?
They just introduced a truckload of reasonable doubt and the possibility that this was an arrest of convenience. I think it’s very likely they have a weak case. I hope the AA isn’t another 132 page word salad like the one in the Morphew case.They don’t appear to be on top of their game.