- Joined
- Oct 12, 2022
- Messages
- 264
- Reaction score
- 2,085
Lolz. I’m sure Nick McLeland could clear it all up for us. In time.Well look, either all black or light blue jacket/blue jeans. I am sure that is all explained on page 8.![]()
Lolz. I’m sure Nick McLeland could clear it all up for us. In time.Well look, either all black or light blue jacket/blue jeans. I am sure that is all explained on page 8.![]()
On the complexity and the "tentacles". Tentacles means to me more than one person. Each tentacle being a person. I could be wrong but that's my take.Doug Carter:
This case is unlike any that I’ve seen in almost a 40 year career. So, there are so many different tentacles to this. It’s very… it’s very complex. [Nov 2022 - Doug Carter Radio Interview Transcript - Hammer & Nigel Show [Delphi murders, Richard Allen & Kegan Kline Discussion] - CrimeLights]
No, and I hope one day [when the case is solved] that everyone knows what we know, and I think you’ll be surprised. [Feb 2021 - Delphi Murders: Superintendent Doug Carter Interview / 4 Year Anniversary - CrimeLights ]
I thought the PC might shed light on this "complexity", but not seeing it, bullet found, man fitting profile admits to being there, gun matches bullet ...
Maybe the PC sheds light on the second quote though, we are surprised about how much they knew in 2017 and didn't act upon ...
crimelights.com
Maybe why he recused himselfSo page 8 proves my theory that the PC affidavit was NOT SWORN and thus was prima facie invalid. What an absolute farce that any judge allowed someone to be locked up on this.
How does a cycled round get there? Best bet is he jacked the slide as a threat gesture to control someone being difficult, lost sight of the ejected bullet in the heat of what was going on, and then either forgot about it or couldn't find it later.In my opinion, can not really understand what an unspent round would be doing at the crime scene. Even if RA killed the girls, why drop an unfired bullet at the scene? makes no sense to me. Generally bullets for semi-auto pistols remain in the pistol magazine where they are kept secure. How could one drop out and land on the ground between the girl's bodies? Unless there was a loose round in his pocket, that happened to drop out at the crime scene, but again, WHY?
To me, the strongest evidence presented was:
1) Allen volunteered he was there on the Monan High Bridge at about the time the girls disappeared.
2) Allen by his own admission was dressed like Bridge Guy
3) the girl who saw someone dressed as Bridge Guy "muddy and bloody" walking toward his car.
Also, does anyone else notice that page 8 of 8 of the affidavit is missing? I wonder why?
I think LE has it. MOOI'd like to know where that jacket is. JMO
That is a very weird response. I work in a court clerk's office (albeit not in Indiana) and we never tell people to contact the judge because they really can't, they can at most talk to the judicial assistant and that's really only ever about scheduling hearings. I imagine that the circuit court clerk's office is absolutely overwhelmed by this case and requests for info/copies so maybe that reply was not entirely serious and more sarcastic.Some news places have the “8th” page of the PCA.
You can see that here (it’s a blank signature page) DocumentCloud
Weirdly, when I got the PCA from the clerk today via email and inquired about page 8 this was the response. So I’m a bit confused (I blocked out my name)
This was the probable cause affidavit for the arrest, not the search. It states what was taken in the search: jackets, boots, knives and firearms,The Probable Cause Affidavit was sufficient for the Search Warrant to be issued.
We won't know what was discovered during the Search until the Trial.
That is when Evidence recovered from the Search led to the Murder charges being laid,
The goal of the Probable Cause Affidavit is only to get the Search Warrant, nothing more.
We will finally hear the evidence at the trial next year.
Thankfully we are on the road to Justice for Abby and Libby.
I am in the US and cannot access it either.Sorry out of country for you! I will attach it.
But the search warrant is mentioned in the Probable Cause Affidavit...The Probable Cause Affidavit was sufficient for the Search Warrant to be issued.
We won't know what was discovered during the Search until the Trial.
That is when Evidence recovered from the Search led to the Murder charges being laid,
The goal of the Probable Cause Affidavit is only to get the Search Warrant, nothing more.
We will finally hear the evidence at the trial next year.
Thankfully we are on the road to Justice for Abby and Libby.
Any theories on why there was an unspent bullet at the scene? I don't know much about guns - would he have ejected a bullet to show the girls it was loaded, without having to fire it off (that would've possible been heard)? Did he shoot but the gun misfired? And then ne had to eject the bullet?
Do we know if he actually knew RL or was on that property from previous evidence, pictures etc?Things the document reveals or confirms:
1) The PCA makes no reference at all to the Klines or catfishing.
2) The garments found in Deer Creek by the crime scene search were from one or both of the girls.
3) If there was ever a gun in the Wabash River, it isn't RA's Sig Sauer. There's nothing we know so far that calls for a second gun. (There may still be a need for a big knife.)
4) RA's vehicle was almost certainly parked at the former CPS building.
5) A man resembling RA was seen walking toward the MHB shortly before the murderer met the girls. (2:13)
6) One of the victims is heard on audio mentioning seeing a gun.
7) A man resembling RA was seen walking along a road between the Monon High Bridge and the place RA's car was parked. That man looked like he had been in a fight and had muddy, bloody clothing. This around 4PM on the day of the murders.
8) RA's Sig Sauer produced the same extraction marks on a test round as the marks on an unfired round at the crime scene. RA says he never knew RL or visited his property, nor did he ever lend out that firearm. (I'd hate to have to explain that innocently.)
There could be more, but that's what jumps out at me for now.
You' think so, but with the other spectacularly stupid stuff this guy did, it's not that surprising.Surely if he has ejected a bullet he would have picked it up?
That seems like criminal 101 class
You're talking about a dude who said he went to a high bridge to watch the fish.Surely if he has ejected a bullet he would have picked it up?
That seems like criminal 101 class
One of the witnesses quoted in the PCA says “the man was in all black and had something covering his mouth. […] She said he couldn’t have been taller than 5’10. He was wearing a black hoodie, black jeans, and black boots.”
That’s reasonable doubt is it not? McLeland and Diener should - IMO - find alternative careers.