Agree. I also believe that the PC is the tip of the iceberg. MOO.I don’t understand why some are stressing over bullet not being good enough evidence . It’s about the whole picture and he is up to his neck in trouble.
Agree. I also believe that the PC is the tip of the iceberg. MOO.I don’t understand why some are stressing over bullet not being good enough evidence . It’s about the whole picture and he is up to his neck in trouble.
Seems unlikely to me that there would be any blood found on a knife after almost 6 years. It doesn't take a criminal mastermind to soak your murder weapon in bleach. We don't even know that they were killed with a knife, do we? If they were strangled there should be touch DNA if he wasn't wearing gloves. The car would be more fertile ground. You can't submerge a car in bleach.if one of the knives they seized was used in the crime it will light up when they use liminol on it even if he cleaned it and DNA testing will determine the blood that is on the knife. The vehicle will also be subjected to liminol testing and the most miniscule amount of blood will light up like the 4th of July
BBMif one of the knives they seized was used in the crime it will light up when they use liminol on it even if he cleaned it and DNA testing will determine the blood that is on the knife. The vehicle will also be subjected to liminol testing and the most miniscule amount of blood will light up like the 4th of July
The prosecution does say that BG (i.e RA) abducted the girls and did the murders
Ok, if BG photo was released on 2/15/17 then I wonder when RA talked to the conservation officer. Within a week? Within a month? Also when was the info released about the witnesses by LE? If RA mentioned (to the conservation officer) about the three girls he saw at the MHB then I presume it must have been after that info was released to the public. Anyone know? JMO
I don't think they (the prosecution) states RA did the murders.
The PCA is careful on the wording, and the fact on how he is charged:
"forced down the hill by RA and led to the location where they were murdered"
"he (RA) was in the woods with Victim 1 and Victim 2"
"after the victims were murdered, Richard Allen returned to his vehicle"
and the prosecution statement has:
"we strongly believe the evidence shows Richard Allen was involved in the murder of Libby and Abby"
So, I don't see anything where the prosecution states RA actually murdered the poor girls.
I don't think they (the prosecution) states RA did the murders.
The PCA is careful on the wording, and the fact on how he is charged:
"forced down the hill by RA and led to the location where they were murdered"
"he (RA) was in the woods with Victim 1 and Victim 2"
"after the victims were murdered, Richard Allen returned to his vehicle"
and the prosecution statement has:
"we strongly believe the evidence shows Richard Allen was involved in the murder of Libby and Abby"
So, I don't see anything where the prosecution states RA actually murdered the poor girls.
if he soaked the entire knife and didn't just wipe it down in bleach. Ever nook and cranny would need to be broken apart and soaked in bleach as knives have pits in the material and portions not reachable unless the knife is broken down. Did LE ask RAs wife if he had guns and knives? . I can't remember. A significant blood loss is assumed to be lost by the victims. Strangulation generally does not produce this is why I think it is assumed by many he used a knife. All IMO. Thanks for your reply.Seems unlikely to me that there would be any blood found on a knife after almost 6 years. It doesn't take a criminal mastermind to soak your murder weapon in bleach. We don't even know that they were killed with a knife, do we? If they were strangled there should be touch DNA if he wasn't wearing gloves. The car would be more fertile ground. You can't submerge a car in bleach.
JMO.Do you think RA was worried during that time? Or perhaps he had the Ted Bundy type of arrogance and thought he was going to get away with the murders, that he could talk his way out, charm them, etc..?
Because IMO it can’t be both.
And I think a lot of us want to believe that he was crapping his pants because that makes us feel better. We want him to feel what the girls felt, fear. JMO.
mOO ymmv
I'm wondering if the recovered cartridge was 40 caliber Sig Sauer. Anyone know?What other evidence can you get from an unspent bullet (let's assume it wasn't ever loaded)
1. Fingerprint/partial fingerprint
2. DNA
3. Rarity of caliber
4. Rarity of specific bullet brand/type
5. How long was the bullet where found? A day? a week? a month?
6 How many OTHER unspent bullets were found in the area?
MOO
In the Murder Sheet podcast "A conversation with Brett and Alice", starting at minute mark 38:20, Alice says "we know things...we know something about RA and KK. They were "over 18" men who showed a preference for underage girls." Has this "preference" of RA's been established and I missed it? Speculation on the host's part? They did not elaborate and I have not seen this information anywhere else.
EDM to include RA's when describing the preference, as opposed to KK's, who's has been document
I don't think that's it. They aren't even talking like they "know" RA is guilty of the murders. But it sure sounds to me like they know RA is a pedo.He's accused of kidnapping and murdering two tweenage girls. Alice, and i would assume to almost all of us that follow true crime much, understand that these crimes are sexually motivated, the limited evidence we have backs that up (clothes from 2 victims in the river not of their bodies etc).
i disagree, it's Alice from "The Prosecutors" that says that Alice and Brett have never claimed to have any inside information on the case other than what MS has told them and Kevin from MS later in the episode said their sources really think KK and RA might be linked or others might be involve, but as of yet they have found no evidence of it. LE could have evidence RA is a pedo (i certainly suspect he is) but Alice would not be privy to that (nor does she claim she is). I listen to everything "The Prosecutors" do (great podcast btw) and its clear to me JMO IMO what she is saying.I don't think that's it. They aren't even talking like they "know" RA is guilty of the murders. But it sure sounds to me like they know RA is a pedo.
Good find @mlgdvm94!
RA stated he went onto bridge as far as Platform #1. While I've never been to Delphi, it is my impression from maps and photos that the CS (depending on how steep or rugged an embankment one is willing to traverse) could be accessed from either side of the MHB and it wouldn't be necessary to cross the bridge to get to the CS - although the CS was a fair bit closer below to the South End than it was the North End. Thus without crossing the entire bridge RA/BG could've departed the bridge from Platform #1 and still journeyed down to the CS.I thought he asserted that he never crossed the bridge?
I’m listening to this and surprised by this remark but I’ve never listened to Brett and Alice before. Just wondering if they have mentioned this in the past on their podcast?In the Murder Sheet podcast "A conversation with Brett and Alice", starting at minute mark 38:20, Alice says "we know things...we know something about RA and KK. They were "over 18" men who showed a preference for underage girls." Has this "preference" of RA's been established and I missed it? Speculation on the host's part? They did not elaborate and I have not seen this information anywhere else.
EDM to include RA's when describing the preference, as opposed to KK's, who's has been documented.