IN - Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #170

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #401
Go back and read the gag order and show me where this violates the order?

Are they not allowed to put forth their theory of the defense in filings? The state put forth their case in the arrest warrant and search warrant affidavits. Which were unsealed. By Gull herself.
State put forward basic, straightforward facts to obtain the search warrant and subsequent arrest warrant. Not wild theories based on fiction with main objective to cause distrust and doubt.JMO
 
  • #402
[sbm]

This post captures perfectly why there should have been a hearing.
jmo

Surely MW broke some kind of law and charges are pending but if he didn’t why wouldn’t AB file a civil suit? That‘s the only reason I can think of why his affidavit is sealed, unless it’s already proven to be untrue.
 
  • #403
R & B seem more like happy warriors that cowards. JMO FWIW
They seem dangerously delusional to me. They had a chance to face the Judge head on at the Oct 19th trial with the cameras rolling. Just like they begged for.

MOO
 
  • #404
I can’t help but wonder if the need for confidentiality and protection around the former D’s recent filings is due to the likelihood of an ongoing investigation into the leaks? MW allegedly claims to be the source of the leak…but is his word credible? The person who could verify whether MW is telling the truth is dead. Unbelievably tragic on so many levels.

JMO
 
  • #405
Ok, I thought this was their complaint against their withdrawal and Judge G's recusal.

No, nothing about that (yet anyway) however inaccurate info might’ve been spread around and about to try lead people to believe that‘s what the filing involved.
 
  • #406
I can’t help but wonder if the need for confidentiality and protection around the former D’s recent filings is due to the likelihood of an ongoing investigation into the leaks? MW allegedly claims to be the source of the leak…but is his word credible? The person who could verify whether MW is telling the truth is dead. Unbelievably tragic on so many levels.

JMO

On that topic I’m curious exactly how AB knows he was snookered and betrayed by MW? Did MW have signin access to the office PCs, was the office monitored by CCTV, or he believed it because of the FB private messages? He never said.
 
  • #407
I don't know if the judge is "hiding" documents because she " doesn't like" them and isn't the reason for removal of some of those documents because they were filed when B&R were no longer RA's attorneys as they had withdrawn?
The filings that JG is accused of disappearing are these:
Pg 220 Those pleadings include: Franks motion filed 9/18/23, Franks memorandum filed 9/18/23, three affidavits (Warden Galipeau, sgt Jones, sgt Robinson) filed 10/10/23 and the affidavit of the leaker, Mitch Westerman.
Record of Proceedings.pdf

The ones that JG ordered to be removed from the record are still there. Unless there were more on that specific date that she removed, these are the ones I believe she was referring to:
10/26/2023Notice to Court Filed
Verified Notice of Continuing Representation
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023Motion Filed
Motion to Disqualify
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023Praecipe for Transcript Filed
Praecipe for Transcript
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023Motion for Continuance Filed
Motion for Continuance
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/26/2023
 
  • #408
They seem dangerously delusional to me. They had a chance to face the Judge head on at the Oct 19th trial with the cameras rolling. Just like they begged for.

MOO

I thought Judge Gull ran the hearing very well. Maybe they expected her to lose it and cause a scene after they sat themselves down at the defense table? Didn’t happen. H apparently also tried but was ignored. What has occurred to change things in the last 12 days? When do you plan to turn over discovery? Good open ended questions. Court is adjourned (move along, nothing to see here.)

JMO
 
  • #409
The filings that JG is accused of disappearing are these:
Pg 220 Those pleadings include: Franks motion filed 9/18/23, Franks memorandum filed 9/18/23, three affidavits (Warden Galipeau, sgt Jones, sgt Robinson) filed 10/10/23 and the affidavit of the leaker, Mitch Westerman.
Record of Proceedings.pdf

The ones that JG ordered to be removed from the record are still there. Unless there were more on that specific date that she removed, these are the ones I believe she was referring to:
10/26/2023Notice to Court Filed
Verified Notice of Continuing Representation
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023Motion Filed
Motion to Disqualify
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023Praecipe for Transcript Filed
Praecipe for Transcript
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023Motion for Continuance Filed
Motion for Continuance
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/26/2023
I thought it was these two that are mentioned?
IMG_7531.jpeg
 
  • #410
We know this from Brad Rozzi's praecipe. He is the one who alerted us to the fact that this was audio recorded when he asked for it. She ignored that filing and removed it from the record. I think it will come out. Under public records request any of us should be able to obtain it but it has to be made part of the record in order for it to even be found so take from that what you will. The audio may prove pivotal. You can't get tone from a written transcript but audio may prove to shed a completely different light on what occurred in there.

jmo
I don't think Judge G or the State ever suggested that there wasn't a record made, I knew there would be one made on a decision of this scale. Rozzi and Baldwin withdrew and were not RA's Attorneys of record after the 19th, why would he be entitled to it? Maybe to leak it too?

It should be good audio though considering it was held in the cozy acoustics of the Judge's chambers.

Again, this is another example of this megalomanic Defense trying to push a "woe is us" narrative.

MOO
 
  • #411
I don't think Judge G or the State ever suggested that there wasn't a record made, I knew there would be one made on a decision of this scale. Rozzi and Baldwin withdrew and were not RA's Attorneys of record after the 19th, why would he be entitled to it? Maybe to leak it too?

It should be good audio though considering it was held in the cozy acoustics of the Judge's chambers.

Again, this is another example of this megalomanic Defense trying to push a "woe is us" narrative.

MOO
Such a chambers hearing record would be a public record.
 
  • #412
  • #413
Such a chambers hearing record would be a public record.
Not necessarily considering the ability of D's inclination of leaking things. I bet it has been made available to the appropriate parties though.
 
  • #414
I don't think Judge G or the State ever suggested that there wasn't a record made, I knew there would be one made on a decision of this scale. Rozzi and Baldwin withdrew and were not RA's Attorneys of record after the 19th, why would he be entitled to it? Maybe to leak it too?

It should be good audio though considering it was held in the cozy acoustics of the Judge's chambers.

Again, this is another example of this megalomanic Defense trying to push a "woe is us" narrative.

MOO

Valid point, I agree there’s been a way too much foolish drama created over absolutely nothing all because of the ex-D’s antics. It’s as if a pro-defense brainstorm sessions were happening to portray the Judge and prosecution in the worst possible light, all built on speculation, not truth.

JMO
 
  • #415
On that topic I’m curious exactly how AB knows he was snookered and betrayed by MW? Did MW have signin access to the office PCs, was the office monitored by CCTV, or he believed it because of the FB private messages? He never said.
Where's Westerman's affidavit? affidavit affidavit affidavit

(nm the echo chamber)
 
  • #416
Not necessarily considering the ability of D's inclination of leaking things. I bet it has been made available to the appropriate parties though.
It has not.
 
  • #417
Valid point, I agree there’s been a way too much foolish drama created over absolutely nothing all because of the ex-D’s antics. It’s as if a pro-defense brainstorm sessions were happening to portray the Judge and prosecution in the worst possible light, all built on speculation, not truth.

JMO
Unfortunately these 'antics' have real consequences. Can you even imagine how the families of Abby & Libby would have responded to that sickening unnecessary CS section of their little "Memo". What about the people they named in detail, who have not been named POI by LE?

There are real people with real feelings and lives whom they are trampling all over in an effort to appear as the genius creativity. Yes, they actually state in their response that the legal community claimed their Memorandum was genius? Who says that, really????? o_O Maybe 1st year law students on a paper they are especially proud of, not professional attorneys with 50 combined years of experience.

MOO
 
  • #418
Hello @FrostedGlass
You're incredible with the links; thank you soooo much.
Does WS have a thread for all your links?
If so, may I pretty please trouble you to paste below the link to the links?
Graci!
 
  • #419
I thought it was these two that are mentioned?
View attachment 457479
Those are from the JG doc dump. Everything in that one is prior to June 28 or whatever that date is.
The ones I quoted are more recent. She was excluding back then and still doing it in Oct.
 
  • #420
I'm bringing Judge Gull's document dump forward
Below it are the posts where I did a brief summary of each document
I did this for myself so there may be some small errors along the way.
Every doc is the full pdf so you can actually read it.
It's all in Thread #164, Thread Pgs 26, 31, 37, 38, 40, 40
Judge Gull's Document Dump June 27, 2023 (283 pgs)
Fox's Version with Full Docs
I downloaded this version, word searchable, page numbers
Ignore the words in the box; this link only shows my post
Pg 1 - pg 60
Pg 61 - pg 100
Pg 101- 120
pg 121- 210
Pg 212-256
Pg 258 - 283
Bumpity Bump @Emma Peel
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
155
Guests online
3,008
Total visitors
3,163

Forum statistics

Threads
632,279
Messages
18,624,227
Members
243,074
Latest member
nousernameimagination
Back
Top