Go back and read the gag order and show me where this violates the order?
Are they not allowed to put forth their theory of the defense in filings? The state put forth their case in the arrest warrant and search warrant affidavits. Which were unsealed. By Gull herself.
State put forward basic, straightforward facts to obtain the search warrant and subsequent arrest warrant. Not wild theories based on fiction with main objective to cause distrust and doubt.JMO
Surely MW broke some kind of law and charges are pending but if he didn’t why wouldn’t AB file a civil suit? That‘s the only reason I can think of why his affidavit is sealed, unless it’s already proven to be untrue.
They seem dangerously delusional to me. They had a chance to face the Judge head on at the Oct 19th trial with the cameras rolling. Just like they begged for.
I can’t help but wonder if the need for confidentiality and protection around the former D’s recent filings is due to the likelihood of an ongoing investigation into the leaks? MW allegedly claims to be the source of the leak…but is his word credible? The person who could verify whether MW is telling the truth is dead. Unbelievably tragic on so many levels.
No, nothing about that (yet anyway) however inaccurate info might’ve been spread around and about to try lead people to believe that‘s what the filing involved.
I can’t help but wonder if the need for confidentiality and protection around the former D’s recent filings is due to the likelihood of an ongoing investigation into the leaks? MW allegedly claims to be the source of the leak…but is his word credible? The person who could verify whether MW is telling the truth is dead. Unbelievably tragic on so many levels.
On that topic I’m curious exactly how AB knows he was snookered and betrayed by MW? Did MW have signin access to the office PCs, was the office monitored by CCTV, or he believed it because of the FB private messages? He never said.
I don't know if the judge is "hiding" documents because she " doesn't like" them and isn't the reason for removal of some of those documents because they were filed when B&R were no longer RA's attorneys as they had withdrawn?
The filings that JG is accused of disappearing are these:
Pg 220 Those pleadings include: Franks motion filed 9/18/23, Franks memorandum filed 9/18/23, three affidavits (Warden Galipeau, sgt Jones, sgt Robinson) filed 10/10/23 and the affidavit of the leaker, Mitch Westerman. Record of Proceedings.pdf
The ones that JG ordered to be removed from the record are still there. Unless there were more on that specific date that she removed, these are the ones I believe she was referring to:
10/26/2023
Notice to Court Filed
Verified Notice of Continuing Representation
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023
Motion Filed
Motion to Disqualify
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023
Praecipe for Transcript Filed
Praecipe for Transcript
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023
Motion for Continuance Filed
Motion for Continuance
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/26/2023
They seem dangerously delusional to me. They had a chance to face the Judge head on at the Oct 19th trial with the cameras rolling. Just like they begged for.
I thought Judge Gull ran the hearing very well. Maybe they expected her to lose it and cause a scene after they sat themselves down at the defense table? Didn’t happen. H apparently also tried but was ignored. What has occurred to change things in the last 12 days? When do you plan to turn over discovery? Good open ended questions. Court is adjourned (move along, nothing to see here.)
The filings that JG is accused of disappearing are these:
Pg 220 Those pleadings include: Franks motion filed 9/18/23, Franks memorandum filed 9/18/23, three affidavits (Warden Galipeau, sgt Jones, sgt Robinson) filed 10/10/23 and the affidavit of the leaker, Mitch Westerman. Record of Proceedings.pdf
The ones that JG ordered to be removed from the record are still there. Unless there were more on that specific date that she removed, these are the ones I believe she was referring to:
10/26/2023
Notice to Court Filed
Verified Notice of Continuing Representation
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023
Motion Filed
Motion to Disqualify
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023
Praecipe for Transcript Filed
Praecipe for Transcript
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/25/2023
10/26/2023
Motion for Continuance Filed
Motion for Continuance
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp: 10/26/2023
We know this from Brad Rozzi's praecipe. He is the one who alerted us to the fact that this was audio recorded when he asked for it. She ignored that filing and removed it from the record. I think it will come out. Under public records request any of us should be able to obtain it but it has to be made part of the record in order for it to even be found so take from that what you will. The audio may prove pivotal. You can't get tone from a written transcript but audio may prove to shed a completely different light on what occurred in there.
I don't think Judge G or the State ever suggested that there wasn't a record made, I knew there would be one made on a decision of this scale. Rozzi and Baldwin withdrew and were not RA's Attorneys of record after the 19th, why would he be entitled to it? Maybe to leak it too?
It should be good audio though considering it was held in the cozy acoustics of the Judge's chambers.
Again, this is another example of this megalomanic Defense trying to push a "woe is us" narrative.
I don't think Judge G or the State ever suggested that there wasn't a record made, I knew there would be one made on a decision of this scale. Rozzi and Baldwin withdrew and were not RA's Attorneys of record after the 19th, why would he be entitled to it? Maybe to leak it too?
It should be good audio though considering it was held in the cozy acoustics of the Judge's chambers.
Again, this is another example of this megalomanic Defense trying to push a "woe is us" narrative.
I don't think Judge G or the State ever suggested that there wasn't a record made, I knew there would be one made on a decision of this scale. Rozzi and Baldwin withdrew and were not RA's Attorneys of record after the 19th, why would he be entitled to it? Maybe to leak it too?
It should be good audio though considering it was held in the cozy acoustics of the Judge's chambers.
Again, this is another example of this megalomanic Defense trying to push a "woe is us" narrative.
Valid point, I agree there’s been a way too much foolish drama created over absolutely nothing all because of the ex-D’s antics. It’s as if a pro-defense brainstorm sessions were happening to portray the Judge and prosecution in the worst possible light, all built on speculation, not truth.
On that topic I’m curious exactly how AB knows he was snookered and betrayed by MW? Did MW have signin access to the office PCs, was the office monitored by CCTV, or he believed it because of the FB private messages? He never said.
Valid point, I agree there’s been a way too much foolish drama created over absolutely nothing all because of the ex-D’s antics. It’s as if a pro-defense brainstorm sessions were happening to portray the Judge and prosecution in the worst possible light, all built on speculation, not truth.
Unfortunately these 'antics' have real consequences. Can you even imagine how the families of Abby & Libby would have responded to that sickening unnecessary CS section of their little "Memo". What about the people they named in detail, who have not been named POI by LE?
There are real people with real feelings and lives whom they are trampling all over in an effort to appear as the genius creativity. Yes, they actually state in their response that the legal community claimed their Memorandum was genius? Who says that, really????? Maybe 1st year law students on a paper they are especially proud of, not professional attorneys with 50 combined years of experience.
Hello @FrostedGlass
You're incredible with the links; thank you soooo much.
Does WS have a thread for all your links?
If so, may I pretty please trouble you to paste below the link to the links?
Graci!
Those are from the JG doc dump. Everything in that one is prior to June 28 or whatever that date is.
The ones I quoted are more recent. She was excluding back then and still doing it in Oct.
I'm bringing Judge Gull's document dump forward
Below it are the posts where I did a brief summary of each document
I did this for myself so there may be some small errors along the way.
Every doc is the full pdf so you can actually read it.
It's all in Thread #164, Thread Pgs 26, 31, 37, 38, 40, 40
Judge Gull's Document Dump June 27, 2023 (283 pgs)
So I know LE is obviously not saying everything that goes on behind the scenes but I want to make sure I have all of this correct because it seems almost too maddening for me to believe: LE was aware that RA was on the bridge on the day of the murders at the approximate time that the girls were...
This link for google drive was much easier for me to access. Ill self report to make sure it's ok for me to post this link https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Vayp845i-BxJpf2hVwl6K2fOqi5WqS7F Odd.... Appears I'm the only one that can't access this and I could have sworn I've accessed...
IMO, the RL affidavit says that the FBI agent believed the girls didn't fight back, and the recently unsealed warrant affidavit says that LE believed RA led the girls to where he murdered them. The PCA mentions clothing from both victims being in the creek just south of where the bodies were...
One more after this one, then I'm done going through the documents. The *** after an entry is a note to myself indicating an important one. https://fox59.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2023/06/DelphiDocumentsCombined.pdf 212 = Def Supplemental Motion for Discovery 29 items (Dec 30, 2022) 219 =...
One more after this one, then I'm done going through the documents. The *** after an entry is a note to myself indicating an important one. https://fox59.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2023/06/DelphiDocumentsCombined.pdf 212 = Def Supplemental Motion for Discovery 29 items (Dec 30, 2022) 219 =...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.