zh0r4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2020
- Messages
- 807
- Reaction score
- 4,346
To clarify, are you saying that no DNA linking RA to the crime scene means that RA’s DNA could have still been on one of the victim’s bodies? The bodies are part of the crime scene, so if DNA was on the bodies, DNA would be connected to the crime scene.Okay, again…. I notice no mention of DNA that might’ve been found on the victims bodies, which would be far more incriminating than if DNA had been found at the fairly large crime scene as some of it involves a public area (ie the bridge).
Source: