margarita25
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Messages
- 51,429
- Reaction score
- 207,290
I’m guessing that perhaps the people who do not see the gun do not have experience with firearms or have never owned a gun. I would BET MY LIFE that’s a gun.
Or, Libby quickly concealed her phone so he wouldn’t be aware of it?Agreed. It has been suggested that BG was 60-70ft away from Libby when he was filmed, so if this accurate, why not show more of his approach? There must be something incriminating that they are protecting from public view.
good point....and to take that a step farther in analysis:
I wonder if perp is also years behind "socially" and maybe academically?
Say this perp is older 20's and still in college or still living under
parents' roof when not in school. Maybe he hasn't graduated
to independent living on his own.
All this would also possibly make perp 'seem' to be younger
than his chronological age.
Maybe he's still dependent on parents financially
and still driving parents' car.
Maybe he's a man/child in a man's body w/ a babyish face.
imo.
We have talked very little about something that's nagging me. "Authorities say he is between 18 and 40, but said he may appear younger than he is." Why call that out? That last qualifier speaks volumes IMO. That's a very, very specific qualifier. Again, this is all MOO but they aren't referring to someone who is 39 but looks 35 or someone who is 25 and looks 20. The average person would not even notice a few years age difference. They are referring to someone who looks noticeably and obviously much younger. LE hasn't used the word "much." That word is my interpretation only. So if he's 39, he may look closer to 29. If he's 29, he may look closer to 19.
If they knew who he was, they would not have said he “could be in this room”...for one thing, of many, that shows me they do NOT know who he is. That is why they produced this new sketch for public view. Heaven knows, it caused enough confusion in the way it was handled...if they could have avoided that whole mess, they would have. But they had no choice.
Imo
Good post Matic. And thought provoking too.
Another reason family will probably not turn in their relative
is because often times it's a dysfunctional family that helped
cause the pathology that turned this person into a killer.
Studies have shown that Murderers are Profoundly Damaged.
Killers are driven by devastating histories of Trauma.
- Abuse
- Domestic Violence
- other Perils of Childhood
The above was taken from a report on "Profile of Teen Murderers"
The shame associated with having a killer in a family comes closer
to announcing to the world that "We have a Sick, dysfunctional
Family" and it's this generational dysfunction that keeps this
secret in their closet and behind closed doors.
Or, Libby quickly concealed her phone so he wouldn’t be aware of it?
Yes, his right side.
(Possibly in a body holster)
Eta: which brings to mind again that IF they were shot, ballistics obviously hasn’t produced a match.
I wonder if he makes in his own bullets, and perhaps even silencer.
We don’t know that they were shot. Just thinking out loud. Just because he had a gun it doesn’t mean that’s how they were killed. I suspect he had a knife and rope as well, jmo.
I’m guessing that perhaps the people who do not see the gun do not have experience with firearms or have never owned a gun. I would BET MY LIFE that’s a gun.
My guess weapon possible a gun or knife was used to gain control of the girls but was discharged in the murder. Either strangulation, blunt force trauma or knife was used.
if you google 'power and control murders', strangling comes upI think he’s likely got a knife too, but that is not clearly visible imo.
As for COD we don’t know and I keep thinking of the old “CLUE” board game, “Colonel Mustard with a knife..”) . Obviously this is not a game but that sure if one factor that has kept very tightly guarded.
I have also thought about little Gabriella Doolin. Iirc she was both drowned and strangled (iirc, need to confirm that). The water element makes me wonder about this as well. Head under water during assault.
True, they were handled differently. However, in this case LE released a sketch that they have now determined is most likely irrelevant to the case and needed to get that info out there to the community. That doesn’t necessarily mean they have no idea of who they’re looking at as a suspect. The could just need some help nailing the caseIn those cases when LE has known who the perp was but waited to make an arrest...they were not having PC’s showing new sketches, with a 20+ year age range...so it is not quite the same as those. Jmo
if you google 'power and control murders', strangling comes up
as the most common method that shows power and control. I think FBI profilers suggested
they use this term in pc and believe it was clue to the public as
to cause of death.
They are appealing publically to those close to him that may know something. They are shaking the apple tree to see what falls down. The appeal is also to rattle BG.
I agree. I think the sketch makes him look about 25. Which would mean he is actually 30 - 40??
Thank you. I understand the definition of the word "target." However, I still maintain that Jayme was random. JP knew he wanted a girl, but he didn't have one in mind until he saw Jayme. He targeted her after he saw her in a random moment. She was not someone he previously knew. Just as I think BG probably went to the park with the intentions of doing something and chose Abby and Libby because they were there, female, and he underestimated them.
<modsnip>