- Joined
- Sep 14, 2017
- Messages
- 11,465
- Reaction score
- 115,655
I agree. I don't believe that the location of the bodies had special meaning, or that it was BG's planned destination. IMO, the location is, however, very important for the story it tells.
If the murders were planned, I can't see any reason for BG to have crossed the bridge. Or the creek. Why not wait on the north end, or follow them across and kill them in the woods below the south end of the bridge, on either side? Them being on the north side of the creek doesn't make sense here.
Neither does it make sense to me for BG to ever cross the creek or march them for hundreds or thousands of feet through the woods (or creek). Maybe he did plan to engage them on the south end of the bridge, but they took off down into the woods heading towards the creek, which foiled his plan.
I don't know for sure how it happened, but I feel decently confident that their final location was where it was because that's where BG finally caught up with them. Obviously nobody else feels that way.![]()
MOO have two ideas competing depending on the age of suspect, both would be local.
MOO Older man.
Decides on raping the girls, intends to use the quarry behind the cemetery for cover, he laid in wait on the trail on the north side of bridge, got impatient as they dawdled on the south side, got irritated went across to get them, pulled out his handgun.
Forcing them in front on way down the hill and east toward a place on the south side with privacy, they made a break for it crossed the creek and he caught up with them on the flat where killed them for disobeying his orders and left immediately.
MOO Another theory if a much younger man, is that there is a local young man to whom that flat is something special. He took them there, and killed them there.