I've seen nothing about who it was. There was an article posted here that had a young girl speaking about being there that day but I can't find the post. Maybe it was some other kids there that day?
I am wondering about that couple now that the rest of the timeline seems to be questionable & the reenactment is not completely correct. IF one of the girls was pushed off the bridge only the remaining girl would need to walk with BG down the hill and be easier to control. IF that happened then it may appear as if there are only 2 people (couple) under the bridge to witnesses.
Could this “couple” under the bridge been one of the girls and BG? Had he killed the other or the other got away? He couldn’t control both, and likely came for one(premeditated). One girls runs for help but realizes she needs to stay to help the other. He then killed the one he was arguing with and found the other on the other side of the creek. BG carries the one girl across the creek or orders her across but doesn’t have to carry the other as she is already there. Or he just orders her across the creek. Perhaps the one that got away is there to help. They’re inseparable. He kills both on the other side. The witness just may have heard the BG and the girls. Can she identify the voice? Is the new sketch that of the male of the “couple” when LE says there was a witness? Did everything change when they realized that this “couple” was actually BG and one of the girls? No “couple” under the bridge comes forward to say “that was us.” Maybe this was discussed already but think about the words of LE and their “strategy” changing. BG and one of the girls is the “couple” arguing under the bridge.MOO
Abigail Williams & Liberty German. Delphi, IN. 2/13/17 - Google My Maps
It originated from the witness herself then was published in MSM (the article I linked) then also referred to by Gray Hughes several times. Once it hits MSM or GH it becomes quotable on WS. I think it is believable as photos also backed the times up IIRC.
It is not mentioned which end of the bridge they were seen. I would guess it was the North end where it goes over the Creek, as the south end is on private land and would be classed as trespassing. Two separate witnesses saw them and I would think they have come forward, as only BG has not come forward AFAIK. MOO
That's good info. If they went straight across creek it looks like it would cut about 15 mins off that time .
I wondered about that but I think the witnesses would have identified one of the couple as one of the girls if that was the case so I would say no. Do you have a source link for the couple arguing? I have never seen a source so wonder if that is just rumour? BG is the only person who has not come forward from that day AFAIK which is why he became the suspect.
Yeah, almost any way you get them all from the south end of bridge to the crime scene, it can fit into that 2:30 TOD timeline, IMO.
I would hope they came forward also. Maybe who or what they saw has them in fear? Maybe the reason they were under the bridge was to do something illegal? It has been discussed that under the bridge was a hangout of sorts.
Wow! Very Impressive! Nice work TL4S !
I must be a visual learner - I need maps.
Just a guess, to be honest, with the consideration that BG might have seen the girls dropped off at 1:38 and drove to the CPS lot to park. In any case, even if he'd already been on the trail that day, I think he stayed behind the girls, following them on the trail before they crossed the bridge. The important times are the SC photo and the video, which we don't know for certain. But the more I look at the map, the more likely I think it is the crime happened earlier than I previously thought, which makes the pieces fall together in my mind. I think the "down the hill" was very near 2:30. JMO
