If you go back and read my post, you will see that I stated LE has been actively investigating it
for the past seven years.
Did you read anything about the case? It doesn't appear so, otherwise you would not have made the statements you did.
Here's what really happened:
Arrest in 1982 of man based on testing of pubic hair. Bad science back then.
He was convicted and spent 18 years in prison.
Using new testing, he was exonerated and released in 2001.
For the last 20 years, the pubic hairs have been tested.
Labs in Virginia were eventually able to build a mitrochondrial profile.
Suspects were compared but no matches.
In 2013 a Boise State professor was approached about by LE to help develop a strategy.
2018, remaining samples sent to University of California.
He used "the DNA technique of sequencing to develop a SNP profile (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) to identify a certain stretch of DNA."
They used the profile to find a family.
They found David Dalrymple, visited him in prison where he had been since 2004, had to get a warrant to get a sample, and they found a match.
After nearly 40 years, DNA evidence connects man to the murder of a 9-year-old Nampa girl