This might be the last time I ever click on a link from daily mail.
Where are all those folks who said that KAK was not the interview HLN had and that there was no way? Sometimes you don't know as much as you think you do. Just sayin
I wonder who is the target audienceI'm still in the they have no clue who it is camp.
my take isThe fact that it's now confirmed that KAK actually communicated with Libby prior to the murders seems pretty big to me. Before now we didn't know how he was connected to the case aside from some speculation and rumors that he followed Libby's socials or liked a post of hers. I think LE will be especially uncomfortable if any of the questions or answers reveal aspects of their investigative strategy towards KAK.
(rsbm)
And I think he means that.
I can’t wait omg.
—
Eta:
Is this advisable by LE? Will all the above actually happen in the interview? Will his lawyer assist, will there be anything new mentioned/covered. I have a million questions.
I'm sorry, but nowhere do they say they KNOW who the killer is. This is an excellent example of sensationalism in reporting.
Oh I can't imagine law enforcement will be happy about this. There's nothing they can do though.
Maybe the new information released in December 2021 is important to the case? I don't know. Until you know what the police know it is hard to conclude anything. I do not think the new information is important because I see an older man over 50 in the video.
Every case starts out as a Day 1 case.
The cases I think about are the ones that are 20 or 30 years old where time starts to make people forget. This case is still popular and people will continue to follow it for a while. But even a case like this one can eventually become like those cases. I did not think at the beginning this case would be unsolved 5 years later.
The search was called off from LE/firefighters but some family and friends kept searching IIRC.
11:45 p.m.
The search was called off just before midnight. Family members continued to scour the area searching for Libby & Abby.
At this point in time, Sheriff Laezenby said they had no reason to believe that the girls were in imminent danger and crews would resume their search in the morning.""
DELPHI TIMELINE: The search for Libby & Abby's killer (wrtv.com)
Oh I can't imagine law enforcement will be happy about this. There's nothing they can do though.
Yes, please let us know. I'm siding on the it's all BS and that LE do not have a particular solid suspect in mind. Carter speaks all fancifully and confidently, but hasn't he always? IMO. Still, we will see what that predator says in the HLN interview I guess.
If they have no clue who has done this, how in the world would they know that after an arrest/arrests are made they will need to assign 80-100 more people to the case? That makes no sense at all.
I think this too. My opinion is that they may have had some of the same types of injuries but different COD. For example only, if two people are hit in the head in the same place with the same rock, one could die from blood loss and one could die from brain injury. And that it’s just the luck of the draw which happened to be the fatal injury for each person.Random thought I don’t think has specifically occurred to me before, and not sure I’ve read it here. I might as well post it in the “great aim to post something not already posted”.
There is the, perhaps rare possibility, that they could could have two different CODs, depending how everything actually went down at the very end. Up to this point, I naturally thought, “I wonder if they (collectively) were shot, or strangled, or this or that other COD.
Point is, maybe they have different CODs (or not). Maybe unlikely, but who knows.
To be more specific, maybe the above is possible if he wanted to get one victim out of the way more quickly, and spend more time with the other, ugh I hate to type that.Maybe one victim was immediately/quickly shot, and the other killed in a more hands on way, strangulation/ligature, BFT, drowning, stabbing.
![]()
I think this too. My opinion is that they may have had some of the same types of injuries but different COD. For example only, if two people are hit in the head in the same place with the same rock, one could die from blood loss and one could die from brain injury. And that it’s just the luck of the draw which happened to be the fatal injury for each person.Random thought I don’t think has specifically occurred to me before, and not sure I’ve read it here. I might as well post it in the “great aim to post something not already posted”.
There is the, perhaps rare possibility, that they could could have two different CODs, depending how everything actually went down at the very end. Up to this point, I naturally thought, “I wonder if they (collectively) were shot, or strangled, or this or that other COD.
Point is, maybe they have different CODs (or not). Maybe unlikely, but who knows.
To be more specific, maybe the above is possible if he wanted to get one victim out of the way more quickly, and spend more time with the other, ugh I hate to type that.Maybe one victim was immediately/quickly shot, and the other killed in a more hands on way, strangulation/ligature, BFT, drowning, stabbing.
![]()
So we could get confirmation he did communicate with Libby?! That changes my perspective greatly.Here's a transcript of what she said for those who don't want to use twitter or watch the clip:
"Coming up Saturday night on HLN, I have exclusive new reporting about what happened out here that day five years ago, and some of the evidence in the case. We also have a worldwide exclusive on-camera jailhouse interview with the man behind that fake profile, 'Anthony_shots', and what he says investigators have shared with him about his communications with Libby before her murder. Saturday night, Susan Hendricks is hosting a special one-hour report with a premiere appearance by retired cold case investigator Paul Holes. He is now an HLN host and commentator. All of that is coming up Saturday night on HLN beginning at 6 pm eastern"
I’m shocked his attorney would allow him to speak on record about this unless there’s some absolute way to prove he’s not BG. Like he was incarcerated at the time or something equally irrefutableI can’t wait omg.
—
Eta:
Is this advisable by LE? Will all the above actually happen in the interview? Will his lawyer assist, will there be anything new mentioned/covered. I have a million questions.
Sorry to quote myself but I suppose his public defender can’t stop him if he’s set on providing interviews. All the PD could do is advise him of repercussionsI’m shocked his attorney would allow him to speak on record about this unless there’s some absolute way to prove he’s not BG. Like he was incarcerated at the time or something equally irrefutable