Long post alert sorry
Taking a more in depth look , first off lets note the ISP states this information was not released, but was leaked , so the validity of it could be in question
Its also important to note that in this article it indicates that there's a possibility that 1 of 2 individuals (the named individual and his father) are both potential suspects, so taking into account it may involve 2 individuals we will look at it from that perspective.
The article states this cat fisher was talking to Libby just the night before , and had made plans to meet with Libby at the very Delphi bridge she was last seen at and where she video's the now infamous "walking man" . or “Bridge guy”
He then states on line in a conversation with another girl following the murders, again under the fake profile "She (German) never showed" , indicating he WAS there, but she was not , though we know for a fact both girls were, and by his statement , so was he
. Was that just a BS statement on his part, or was it a slip up?, seems a little more than coincidence, but let's look deeper.
One thing we see very often with criminals, especially in heinous crimes, is a form of gas lighting, where they admit the action, but vehemently deny the intent .
"Yeah we horsed around in the showers, and yeah we were naked, and i hugged him from behind and things might have touched, but in no way was it sexual "-Jerry Sandusky
This is brought on by anxiety, and pressure the offender is feeling post offense, they need to link themselves to it because they know there's evidence, and that it “looks suspicious” but they also need to make themselves appear clean, and distanced, from it because it links them.
Here you have an individual who has been in contact wth one of the victims, with specific knowledge of where the girls are, not only that he has suggested they meet at that very location, some may coincidence, but lets add to the mix, this isnt a normal individual, its a deviant sexual criminal hiding behind a fake internet profile in order to solicit sexual images from young girls .
Now I cant spek for this specific case, but having seen numbers of cases, involving it, one thing I can say about those who collect child











, its exceedingly rare they dont , or havent acted out on their urges at some point in some manner.
Often they molest someone around them, less often they find legal means to do so with some type of physically acceptable surrogate, and even to a much lesser extent they forcibly rape or abduct a victim.
Next we add the probability of the logistics into it, what are the chances that this individual just so happened to also live nearby? Cat fishing can occur from all over the world ,and usually does , but in this case, the sexually deviant criminal who made plans to meet with the girls in the place where they are murdered just so happens to live in the same general area (50 min away?) (Fact: in cases, of Child abduction murder, the offender usually lives near , works near , or frequents the area of the abduction).
The fake profile is discovered by police, the suspect is brought in for questioning, fails not 1 but 2 polygraphs , particularly when asked if he knows "who killed the girls'' then after he was questioned he goes home and immediately deletes his browser history and all conversations he had on social media , social media profiles that he used to communicate with the girls, but googles, "how long does DNA last"? again coincidence? or ......
Remember a warrant was served at this individuals residence only 11 days after the murders (Fact: In roughtly 75 % of cases, the offenders name comes to LE’s attention within the first 7 days of the investigation)
And the topic he researched is odd in and of itself, he states he was concerned because he "gave a sample to police"?, what would difference would the duration of DNA viability matter? I can see "What can DNA a DNA profile expose" or something but not how long is it viable, especially when the sample given to police is going to be usable. That to me indicates someone concerned about the viability of DNA from another time/place.
I understand coincidences, do happen if science has taught us anything its to never say never, and never say always , but when theres more than 1 immediately preceding a crime, particularly a murder let alone a double murder, we have a word for that .... Suspicious
So they just so happen to get cat fished, the night before they are found dead , by a guy who arranged to meet them where they were found dead, and this individual just so happens to have a collection child




in his possession, some of which is from young girls he coaxed, into sending him explicit pictures of using the same profile he used to contact one of the victims.
Then he states he was there , but then claims German "never showed up", which we know is false, she and Abigail Williams were there.
So lets analyze that statement , so he planned to meet at least one of the girls, who think they are meeting a rich male model, (now a police officer himself) but what would happen when they discovered it wasn't this male model they thought they were talking to ?
What if indeed they had sent him pictures now this slovenly individual shows up claiming to be whom they have been communicating with ?
The entire facade would be blown out of the water, I find it unlikely a girl (or anyone really) would react well to someone claiming to be who they weren't especially when the facade was a wealthy male model and the complete opposite shows up .
Will they now out him as a fraud, or even worse a pervert?, will they blow his cover ?
But he has an advantage..... he used a fake profile, Libby wouldn't know who he was, hes anonymous , so he could walk right past her , she would be none the wiser.
But this approaching male apparently triggered something in them enough to record his approach, was it because they were alone ?, was it because they were supposed to meet someone and they were suspicious of this approaching individual?
Their gut instinct was to record a random stranger approaching them while they are alone.
His motives, are most likely sexual .
From there they are either forced, or coerced, to where they are found .
Perhaps he states he is a friend of this "Anthony Shots", who waiting to meet them just "down the hill"
Or he produces, a weapon and forces them to walk.
But he knows he needs to get them some place where he wont be seen, whether or not this was a planned event cannot be pinned down with the little amount of info that has been released.
From there , due to the little amount of info that has been released its all speculative.
Again what are the chances, that 2 girls who wind up murdered are in the exact area that one of them agrees to meet a guy who in reality is already a sexually deviant criminal, who just so happens to live in the area? One that says he was there but the victim “never showed”
Going to say pretty slim.
Then what are the chances that said individual goes home and feels the need to suddenly delete everything connecting him to the deceased and googling ho long DNA is good for?
Again gonna say pretty slim especially if he had nothing to worry about.
I've stated before the only possibilities that exist are random encounters , or a planned meeting.
I noted that it was possible someone was following their social media accounts, and that the girls posting pictures, of themselves, alone may have been what someone was waiting for, or that he knew in advance they would be there
Most abduction murders of children for sexual purposes , unless part of a series, are not planned , they are impulsive spur of the moment acts, this may have been as well we cant know because little info has been released.
SO we have a connection, but which is it , the person named or his dad ?