- Joined
- Jul 31, 2015
- Messages
- 9,938
- Reaction score
- 80,582
*new information icon.....bombshell
I like the "freeundelete" and "recovered data" just for the shock and panic value lol.
*new information icon.....bombshell
Agreed. It was clumsy, in keeping with the PC as a whole.I disagree. The guy operating the PC was just slow on the draw when it came to closing it down.
I missed this, and WOW!
That's a huge thing.
Thanks for posting.
There is a Tweet from Paul Holes as well that is very positive regarding Delphi DNA.I missed this, and WOW!
That's a huge thing.
Thanks for posting.
Nonetheless, it's pretty interesting what was one there.I disagree. The guy operating the PC was just slow on the draw when it came to closing it down.
Well, I can say *I* definitely scrutinized it and went down some rabbit holes.Maybe the computer desktop was viewable on purpose.
Link to Paul Holes the GSK investigator. Scroll down to see his comment that "Indiana reached out to him". Still cagey but quite hopeful.In James Renner’s docu-series Virtually a Detective, LE confirm on camera that they have DNA but in a broad sense/ don’t go into specifics
I agree with the second and third words.3 words
Cindy. Anthony. Chlorophyll.
I agree with the second and third words.
I think you're correct. I've heard they have a partial DNA which can help rule people out but cannot lock someone in.True. But we've heard repeatedly that people questioned have been asked to submit DNA. So I'm guessing they have at least a partial sample.
Regarding a DNA "Drive"....
Many years ago in Toronto, a young girl disappeared walking home from a friend's house. Her body (parts) washed up (in suitcases) onto an island in Lake Ontario. Not far off shore. She had been sexually assualted and obviously murdered.
Toronto Police went door to door on the route she would taken to get home. They knocked on every door and asked every man for a cheek swab. Almost all gave the sample readily. A couple did not.
Within days of this child's murder, her killer was determined. IIRC, he gave himself up.
So, they do work however, getting swabs from a whole town, and outlying areas, is a whole different deal than a couple hundred people.
In James Renner’s docu-series Virtually a Detective, LE confirm on camera that they have DNA but in a broad sense/ don’t go into specifics
Cindy Anthony blatantly lied in court that she was the one who searched the internet for chloroform. She said her dog was acting funny and she thought it was from eating the bamboo and while checking her search lead her from chlorophyll to chloroform. She was at work when that was searched and it wasn't chlorophyll that was even searched. Of course the jury didn't by her lies trying to cover for her daughter.Chlorophyll is why things such as plants and trees are green.
I don’t think anyone’s disputing the fact there’s DNA. But LE has never if they have DNA they are certain leads directly to the murderer.
Aug, 2017
“At every crime scene, you are going to have DNA. We are still working on identifying all of the DNA that we have there,” said Sgt. Holeman.”
Lead detective in Delphi murders confirms police have more audio from phone, DNA evidence
Definitely. But, unfortunately, the time frame of the murders coincides with the timeframe of these tests increasing in popularity/becoming a topic of conversation/people either hating or loving the idea, etc. It wouldn't really be a "red flag" if someone refused to do that.
Still searching for MSM links on the following: 1.) teenager (or group of teenagers) who saw a man dressed all in black 2.) man dressed in flannel (may or may not be the man Libby's dad saw coming off of the trail which I have previously linked). Any help would be greatly appreciated. I feel like I have looked everywhere.
Regarding a DNA "Drive"....
Many years ago in Toronto, a young girl disappeared walking home from a friend's house. Her body (parts) washed up (in suitcases) onto an island in Lake Ontario. Not far off shore. She had been sexually assualted and obviously murdered.
Toronto Police went door to door on the route she would taken to get home. They knocked on every door and asked every man for a cheek swab. Almost all gave the sample readily. A couple did not.
Within days of this child's murder, her killer was determined. IIRC, he gave himself up.
So, they do work however, getting swabs from a whole town, and outlying areas, is a whole different deal than a couple hundred people.
I think they need to catch him or his "alibi" in a lie about a vehicle that was in the area.