IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #53

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
  • #222
So glad to reconnect with you! Sorry for OT mods! :loveyou:

Its such a small world! Can't wait for us to get a together and catch up! I'm excited!!
 
  • #223
Well we know he isn't just a cute guy...he murdered (presumedly) 2 young girls . But if the right person would see this picture it might help catch him..seems much more informative.


[emoji237]Always My Own Opinion[emoji4]
How cool would that be? :yes:
 
  • #224
Lol now I see a dark blue vest and brown plaid shirt underneath.
 
  • #225
Can the same person please do a picture like that with the other photo of him too.He might appear to look a little older in that picture.
 
  • #226
Can the same person please do a picture like that with the other photo of him too.He might appear to look a little older in that picture.

I was just about to make the same comment and request!

I always thought that BG looked quite a bit older in the 2nd pic (actually a couple of decades or so to me!). Very odd.
 
  • #227
Thank you, thank you.

IMO, this solidifies that what rocked those police officers was the video and or audio. Those poor people for having to watch/listen to that.

Those poor girls.

I think in the back of my head I had been holding out hope that it did not cause prolonged anguish and pain. But this is shaking me back into thinking that it was a terrible, awful ordeal. [emoji20]

The above is just my opinion.

What I don't understand is if the video/audio was truly more revealing than the pic and "down the hill" clip why wouldn't they have said he was the main suspect from the get go... instead of saying he was someone they just wanted to interview to see what he had seen? Has anyone explored that on the threads or is it just they didn't want to reveal what they knew?
 
  • #228
So today I watched​ episode three or four of 13 Reasons Why (I know, I know) where they held the Halloween costume party. A few of the jocks wore costumes with snorkels, and each guy wore protective goggles loosely around his neck. I've never had a strong opinion about what BG had around his neck, but now I'm thinking that it could be goggles like this.
8eff3499b3ea70fbfec26a956385ab61.jpg


The above is just my opinion.
 
  • #229
What I don't understand is if the video/audio was truly more revealing than the pic and "down the hill" clip why wouldn't they have said he was the main suspect from the get go... instead of saying he was someone they just wanted to interview to see what he had seen? Has anyone explored that on the threads or is it just they didn't want to reveal what they knew?
I've wondered about this as well. Perhaps if this case is tied up with other similar cases (MOO) LE may have needed to clear it way up the chain before releasing it...?

The above is just my opinion.
 
  • #230
  • #231
My thoughts too. How strange. So he looks about 25 now and less menacing imo.
I'm amazed how this latest cleanup makes me see nearly everything about this picture differently. Unbelievable! [emoji106] This group is amazing.

The above is just my opinion.
 
  • #232
My thoughts too. How strange. So he looks about 25 now and less menacing imo.

I am definitely not seeing someone who looks 25. I am 27, and the way he is dressed appears older than that of any men I know in their 20s. I now see 35-40 instead of 55-60 though. Good job on the photo clean-up.


"Well, once there was always dark. If you ask me, the light’s winning.”
 
  • #233
LE has stated BG is most likely middle-aged. (45-65)
 
  • #234
If BG is younger it would help explain AW and LG's reaction to seeing him. Perhaps they weren't startled as has been thought, therefore they didn't run.

LE has stated BG is most likely middle-aged. (45-65)
Also that Libby started filming because she was alarmed (there may have been some evidence in the audio.) Sorry I misspoke.
 
  • #235
LE has stated BG is most likely middle-aged. (45-65)

Do you have a link? I don't recall reading LE ever gave an age estimate. Am I missing something? TIA.
 
  • #236
I am definitely not seeing someone who looks 25. I am 27, and the way he is dressed appears older than that of any men I know in their 20s. I now see 35-40 instead of 55-60 though. Good job on the photo clean-up.


"Well, once there was always dark. If you ask me, the light’s winning.”

I see 30s too, maybe 40s.
 
  • #237
Thanks for all the comments about the other picture. I'm afraid this one didn't turn out looking quite as normal, but the original isn't quite as clear. I know the head looks a bit too small and somewhat lopsided, but I don't want to change it because I have no idea what to change it to. I wish there was more that could be done with the face, but I don't want to try doing more than just changing contrast, brightness, color saturation, and other things that don't really change the look (just the amount of it's that's visible.)

BGedit2.jpg
 
  • #238
Every time I see a cleaned up version of this picture, I see a younger man. I don't see middle age or older. I see a man in his 20s-30s.

Same!
 
  • #239
  • #240
Thanks for all the comments about the other picture. I'm afraid this one didn't turn out looking quite as normal, but the original isn't quite as clear. I know the head looks a bit too small and somewhat lopsided, but I don't want to change it because I have no idea what to change it to. I wish there was more that could be done with the face, but I don't want to try doing more than just changing contrast, brightness, color saturation, and other things that don't really change the look (just the amount of it's that's visible.)

View attachment 115565
You did great I can finally see feet!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
48
Guests online
2,776
Total visitors
2,824

Forum statistics

Threads
632,158
Messages
18,622,862
Members
243,038
Latest member
anamericaninoz
Back
Top