My heads going to explode because I'm confused about commenting on this here or on the new thread. Thanks though I was looking for it regardless.
Sent from my SM-J727V using Tapatalk
My heads going to explode because I'm confused about commenting on this here or on the new thread. Thanks though I was looking for it regardless.
And we have the link from Nin that says both sides of the creek were searched. So does that make us think the girls weren't there before midnight and were taken and killed elsewhere?
Reopening the discussion. READ ME FIRST
DELPHI, Ind. -- One minute; sixty seconds: It's a fraction of a 24-hour day, and an even smaller part of a week, a month, a year or a life.
And to find justice for two lives that ended too soon, all it takes is 1 minute.
The families of murdered Delphi teens Liberty German, 14, and Abigail Williams, 13, ask you to give their girls that minute of your time to help find their killer.
Truthfully, we don't know that at all. That is your theory that others share as well. But at no time whatsoever has LE stated that BG acted alone, the girls were walked to where they were found, nor whether it was BG that actually murdered them.
Law enforcement has barely said anything.
It is straight common sense, based on known evidence, that brings many of us to otto's scenario.
Law enforcement has barely said anything.
It is straight common sense, based on known evidence, that brings many of us to otto's scenario.
See, the claim was that "we know" as in it is known fact - rather than one's theory - of the flow of the crime. I am simply pointing out it has never been stated that BG acted alone, that the girls were walked to where they were killed, nor whether it was BG that actually murdered the girls. Therefore, if someone has an alternative flow of the crime it is just as valid until LE states that it is not the case. The context in which I was replying was post was challenging someone else's theory based on things "we know" that in truth we do not.Law enforcement has barely said anything.
It is straight common sense, based on known evidence, that brings many of us to otto's scenario.
Some people think the killer/s took the girls out of the area and then brought their bodies to their final destination later, under the cover of darkness.Got a question.. if they did not cross the creek and they came off the SE end of the bridge, how could they have reached the recovery location?
Not saying I believe this, but would like to know the possible logistics. TIA
moo
Got a question.. if they did not cross the creek and they came off the SE end of the bridge, how could they have reached the recovery location?
Not saying I believe this, but would like to know the possible logistics. TIA
moo
Forced into a car immediately under the SE end of bridge, abducted off site, brought back via back of cemetery too within 50 feet of creek where they were murdered and left sometime between 12 and 5 a.m. MOO.Got a question.. if they did not cross the creek and they came off the SE end of the bridge, how could they have reached to the recovery location?
Not saying I believe this, but would like to know the possible logistics. TIA
moo
Or...why not dispose of the bodies in the water?Judging by the lay of the land at the crime scene, why not walk even further from the creek than 50 to 60 ft. ?
I think they searched along both sides of the banks pretty thoroughly the first night. What I don't know is did they search that stretch of the creek?Or...why not dispose of the bodies in the water?
Sent from my LGL51AL using Tapatalk
Judging by the lay of the land at the crime scene, why not walk even further from the creek than 50 to 60 ft. ?