Why murder innocent children? Nothing in this case makes sense-anythings possible.I'm not sure what items of value to pawn two young girls would have in their possession. And then why the tromp through the woods just for a backpack?
Why murder innocent children? Nothing in this case makes sense-anythings possible.I'm not sure what items of value to pawn two young girls would have in their possession. And then why the tromp through the woods just for a backpack?
IMO Adobe blur and smudge tool. There is another photo (same pic) out there untouched.
Time will tell.
Total speculation, just a feeling, but any day I feel like this case is going to get blown wide open!
I very much appreciate those people that bring anything interesting to this discussion.Agree, in time we will have answers.
In the meantime, no one needs to believe what I type but the image expert donated his time at no cost and is highly respected in his field. There is a wealth of information on that thread from him on how easily photos get distorted.
And kudos to Nin for her work and Billy Mabou (works in the field) as well--(both on the image thread) along with others who did so many experiments in an effort to explain the image.
Thanks Ember! A&L don't have the luxury to fight-WE MUST!Try2- Your optimism is refreshing! Release the hounds! Keep the torch held high! We've got to find this ba$tard!
I very much appreciate those people that bring anything interesting to this discussion.
Hi SS- I looked this over. Was there something in particular here that caught your eye? (Greatly admire your sleuthing skills and culling of info, especially when you look back, finding things others are only vaguely recalling.) What do you see here?
No but there was plenty of speculation. I think the consensus was it was his old man.Did anybody ever determine what is in his left hand ? Looks possibly like a fishing pole ?? Also did Gray or anyone say what is that pixels mess on his thigh ?
I'm confused.No but there was plenty of speculation. I think the consensus was it was his old man.
Could you post it? Maybe if we look on thread 1 page 1, that may show it. I'm going to have a look.IMO Adobe blur and smudge tool. There is another photo (same pic) out there untouched.
No, they have told us they won’t speculate.Totally not snarky but I really do not understand this:
If LE thought BG was an SK, why on earth wouldn't they say so?
I mean, that would get MEGA-ATTENTION and everyone would have their eye out for BG nationwide. I just don't get it? Maybe it's some obvious reason and I'm missing it but why wouldn't they just say? Even if they just "suspected" I think they would say, no?
Not snarky at all. Playing devils advocate here but if LE told us he was a serial killer wouldn't the public be even more outraged over no arrest? JMOTotally not snarky but I really do not understand this:
If LE thought BG was an SK, why on earth wouldn't they say so?
I mean, that would get MEGA-ATTENTION and everyone would have their eye out for BG nationwide. I just don't get it? Maybe it's some obvious reason and I'm missing it but why wouldn't they just say? Even if they just "suspected" I think they would say, no?
Which makes me wonder if BG is a SK and LE didn't tell us, how many other SK cases are they keeping secret? Too much to think about.Not snarky at all. Playing devils advocate here but if LE told us he was a serial killer wouldn't the public be even more outraged over no arrest? JMO
Here is a cropped and edited ( adjusted shadows and highlights, resized image) capture of Abby's hair based on this original:
![]()
![]()
It looks to me like something she is actually wearing something in her hair. You can make out some symmetric object.
As comparison. I went ahead and placed a dot on the same spot with 63% opacity and flow to come as close as possible to the original. When resized, the dot is still there, not comparable to the first image:
![]()
All IMO
-Nin