I can't imagine! Talk about getting caught red handed!What exactly will be his defense??
And very fortunately she's alive and can testify if need be. I hope she's not put on the stand to have to see him tho.
I can't imagine! Talk about getting caught red handed!What exactly will be his defense??
Don't they have 3 strikes in Indiana?I think that’s standard, leaves the door open for plea deals.
I believe she could testify privately on a closed circuit television type of thing. Hopefully, anyway.I can't imagine! Talk about getting caught red handed!
And very fortunately she's alive and can testify if need be. I hope she's not put on the stand to have to see him tho.
IIRC, she lived right next door to him, so she/her family was probably familiar with him. There is an online site called “WatchDog” and you enter your address and it will list the names, photos, and criminal record of local sex offenders in your area. I’ve had it since my kids were young. They still email me updates as to when an offender moves in or out of the area. It is shocking to see how close they are to you. Unfortunately, it only follows sex offenders, but I wish it would list ALL criminals.Don't they have 3 strikes in Indiana?
That girl should never have been exposed to a dangerous man like that in the community.
He was arresred for so many things after prison.
He was murdering her and thankngod the police figured it out time.
LPD rocks.
I am always torn about which one is worse for the criminal, life in prison or the death penalty.Indiana has the death penalty.
That's a bargaining tool imo.
I believe she could testify privately on a closed circuit television type of thing. Hopefully, anyway.
Hopefully she could, but if Indiana is like some other states, there are a lot of restrictions on when this allowed because of the constitutional principle that the accused be allowed to face the accuser.
Here's an informative article that talks about under what circumstances prosecutors can petition to use CCTV testimony (it is very infrequently granted, apparently): Closed-circuit testimony used first time in child sex abuse trial
Prosecutors and the defense attorney likely remain in negotiation even while the rest of these proceedings continue on.
Diabolical.LE doesn't want one iota of anything leaked on JBC so that he can use it and have an advantage for his defense later down the line. Funny how JBC is the one using Delphi now for his defense..how JBC is attaching himself now...
mOO
What exactly will be his defense??
So what exactly did he say?Also, I'm not sure if this article has been shared in the thread, apologies if so.
This describes how the officers who participated in rescuing the victim in this case were awarded by the Lafayette City Council.
It contains one officer's account of how he was suspicious of JBC the first two times he talked to him that night and then on the third time rescued the victim. It has some details I had not heard before.
Lafayette officers awarded for rescuing child, delivering baby
“It was what he said to me,” Maxwell said, “it was just too unique and not what someone would say to having a 9-year-old girl in their house.”
My God. I hate him even more now.Back when this first happened, there were clues the young victim might be autistic or other special needs. If accurate, would that have a bearing on whether she testifies?
His only hope for freedom would be some legal technicality. I’m sure they're dotting every i and crossing every t.I'll say these are not GOOD defenses but he can try insanity or just try to plea and get a lesser sentence claiming childhood sexual abuse or something else sad to try to lessen his responsibility.
But yikes I really can't think of many worse scenarios. He's certainly not going to get out of this IMO