IN - Kimberly Camm, 35, & 2 children murdered, Georgetown, 28 Sept 2000 *2 earlier trials OVERTURNED

  • #261
He has just recently had another appeal turned down,

now saying he will appeal because there were typos in the transcript,

Boney - his accomplice has not had any appellate issues raised yet

I was very shocked when Boney came out of the woodwork, and I have always wondered if Boneys sweatshirt had been tested at the time and his DNA found would Camm ever have been charged,

as they would have Boney tied to the crime scene, but maybe Boney would have talked back then too

Camm imo will never admit his guilt so he will never leave prison unless he gets a successful appeal and a NG on retrial
 
  • #262
He has just recently had another appeal turned down...Camm imo will never admit his guilt so he will never leave prison unless he gets a successful appeal and a NG on retrial
Good to hear about his appeal being turned down. I don't think that "there were typos in the transcript" will help win him a new trial. I hope that he rots in prison.
 
  • #263
This case is back on 48 hours tonight, 2 hours.
I still think Camm is guilty. It's very interesting reading through this thread and hearing all the inside info from locals.
 
  • #264
Would the new "Touch DNA" test help in this case?
 
  • #265
  • #266
  • #267
Hi Boyz Mum,
I was reading the posts on this forum and found many things stated here that just aren't true. I'm all for putting this guy away if he is guilty, I just think it should be based on evidence.
Happy New Year!
 
  • #268
continued . . what I meant to say is that I am familiar with this case and the evidence to prove guilt just isn't there.
 
  • #269
continued . . what I meant to say is that I am familiar with this case and the evidence to prove guilt just isn't there.

Personally I believe his ties to Boney are the key to solving the whole case. I guess now I don't know if I believe he hired Boney to do this or if it was retaliation against Camm the cop. Just seeing the pictures of their beautiful family, I pray that Camm wasn't "the bad guy".

Bless your heart Houndacres, you seem to be able to look into this and be far more reasonable than I am in drawing conclusions. :blowkiss:
 
  • #270
For those of you who do not know much about the case other than reading from the media. I would like for you to go to www.justicefordavidcamm.com
There is alot of information about this case there.
Also check the forum at
http://community.cnhi.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9101084/m/3821005031

There is awhole lot of information there as well.
He has an appeal at the Supreme Court now waiting on the Justice's to review the wrongs of this case.
There are many many wrongs of this case.
I do know David and yes I know he is innocent.
Please take the time to read.
He did not Molest his daughter. Kim was not leaving him. He WAS PLAYING basketball during the murders.
There is actually NO evidence tying him to this case.
There was DNA from Charles Boney and an unknown female.
Plus many things from this case came up missing. Charles boney was a free man for 4 1/2 years!! Boney-Backbone did this on his own.
Take the time to read please. You will find that there is reasonable doubt. Even the Juries said there was doubt but yet they convicted him on NO evidence.
This trial will be overturned as well.
ANY questions you may email me I will answer or find the answer for you!
ky.medic @yahoo.com
 
  • #271
Anyone on here know Charles Boney??
If so did he confess to you?
HE IS the SOLE killer in this case. Had his freedom for 4 1/2 yrs.
He BRAGGED about doing this!!!!

So all that THINK David is guilty tell me why? What evidence???
 
  • #272
Hi KyMedic! Glad to see you here! I'm also glad to see this forum take off again! I will add that I am one who thought David was guilty from the beginning. I have lived in this area most of my life. I do not know David. However, after studying the facts of this case, I can honestly say the state did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Also, there have been too many false rumors spread in this case. So, for anyone concerned about justice, I challenge you to read the evidence yourself and decide.
 
  • #273
Thanks Hound Acres!

I hope that people will read and decide for themself. Not just listen to rumour.
Or read headlines. BUT read the other forum and read the justice site.
There is so much information about this case also.
Here is a link to the Supreme Ct. Webcast. You can see the Justices were NOT happy about the handling of this case as well

http://www.indianacourts.org/apps/webcasts/default.aspx?search=87S00-0612-CR-499&view=table&sort=

Click on David Camm and you can watch the Supreme Court Oral arguments.
 
  • #274
Hi Boyz Mum, I too had problems with the ties to Boney (Pronounced Bo-Nay). If you knew the area in which David and Kim lived, it didn't seem likely to me that Boney just happened to be in that area randomly. However, after further review of the evidence, I learned that Boney hung around Karem's meat market. The owner of Karem's is somehow realted to Kim?? Kim frequented this meat market often. I lived within walking distance of Community Park, the place where David supposedly met Boney. There were always basketball games going on. However, there is not one person who can place David at Community Park, except Boney (a proven liar and convicted criminal).
 
  • #275
One of the biggest problems I had with the whole case was the rumor about the insurance policy that David's brother supposedly wrote and forged Kim's name on. However, if you check out the sites that KyMedic has provided, you will see that these rumors just aren't true. The biggest shock I found in the whole thing was Boney's ties to Stan Faith, the prosecutor in the first trial. You would think, given the supposedly check and balances of our justice system, that this type of thing couldn't happen! It is scary to think that this man has been in prison for 8 years (I think it's 8??) and nothing has been done to correct this horrible wrong! Wow. . I have never been a big David Camm fan and now I find myself defending him. . most important here is the fact that this could happen to anyone, not just David. If he is innocent, it needs to be corrected and NOW!
 
  • #276
Yes the ties between Stan Faith and Boney run VERY VERY DEEP!
Stan was Boney's lawyer, his reference for jobs, Stan and Boney's mother are VERY VERY VERY CLOSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
  • #277
kymedic and Houndacres, thank you very much for the links and the information you've both provided. Everything I learned about this case was through the 48 hours show and it's been a while since seeing it.

Boney is in jail now, correct? He was a real piece of work.
 
  • #278
Yes the ties between Stan Faith and Boney run VERY VERY DEEP!
Stan was Boney's lawyer, his reference for jobs, Stan and Boney's mother are VERY VERY VERY CLOSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stan Faith was the prosecutor in the trial against David Camm? (And had all these ties to Boney?) How on earth does that happen- is the prosecutor supposed to resign if there is conflict like this?

I am sorry for asking so many questions- I'll have to read the links you've both provided. Thanks again!
 
  • #279
Stan was prosecutor in the 1st trial. Before they found Boney. Faith said the "sweatshirt" with the name "BACKBONE " IN IT was nothing. He did not run a DNA test on it. He pushed it aside!!!
The 2nd trial was under Henderson. Faith lost his re-election to Henderson. This is also when the DEFENSE finally was able to push them to run the DNA on the sweatshirt.
There are many many things so wrong with this case!
Faith should lose his license for this injustice.
 
  • #280
Faith should have been charged with a criminal offense for all of this! Not to mention all the evidence that just DISAPPEARED! I think what concerned me the most was that they wouldn't test the shirt for DNA when requested. It took several years before the defense could get them to test the shirt. There were condoms that disappeared and a shower curtian . . can't recall right off hand what else. They didn't do a rape kit either.
KyMedic, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Kim have defense wounds? Also, wasn't there some evidence that her pants had been partially removed? David didn't have any wounds on him, did he?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
62
Guests online
2,233
Total visitors
2,295

Forum statistics

Threads
633,222
Messages
18,638,163
Members
243,452
Latest member
odettee
Back
Top