I would thoroughly check out this friend. Everyone assumes that she was walking alone at 4:30 am because he said so, but unless there's some sort of evidence that she was by herself I would be suspicious.
Also, check out this: http://www.bloomingpedia.org/wiki/Jill_Behrman
I know that these sort of entries aren't exactly objective, but it would be worth looking into the possibility that they didn't get the right guy and the real killer is still out there.
Hi everyone, this is my first post here so I thought a hello was in order.
But the above poster is thinking some of the same thoughts as myself.
1. Has the "male friend" been checked out? If he watched her walk away and came right back inside the house to the party, then he can be ruled out immediately. If he left but took awhile to return, or was leaving for the night himself, that does not make him guilty by any stretch of the imagination, but he would certainly have to be thoroughly investigated.
The reason why this is relevant is that he has not been acquitted in public by LE or the news reports. It seems like if he was for sure not involved, that would have been reported -- but instead, the first reports are "last seen at 4:30 a.m. ...." but the latest reports are "He saw her last on the corner of 11th Street and College Avenue, he told police. That catches my attention.
2. I also thought about the Jill Behrman case and the possibility that the real killer was not caught. However, 11 years is too long a time IMO for a serial killer to be inactive. You'd think there would have been others in that timeframe, unless the killer moved away and came back.