SmoothOperator
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that ther
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,591
- Reaction score
- 44,585
The ATTY for CR, Salzman, who is also the former DA.. He, as many of us have discussed, has been anything but tight lipped in this case..
And on more than one occasion he has made statements alluding to the involvement of JW..
He first stated that he hoped that LE took seriously and followed up on the direction and leads/info that his client provided to LE..IMO indicating that he and his client possibly had a good idea of who was responsible..
He later made a statement that CR/MB also had fully cooperated with meeting withbLE as well as immediately providing DNA.. He said that he was in contact with both MB and JR's Attys and that those 3 were absolutely NOT in any way involved with Laurens disappearance.. When asked about JW he could not comment.. IMO again somewhat alluding to JW being somehow responsible..
And then again he makes a statement that he certainly hopes that LE are going in the direction of the info that his client had provided and follows it up by stating that 90% of the time the responsible party is someone the victim was intimately involved with.. Again IMO once more alluding to JW being the party responsible..
Wonder how much he's talked with JRs ATTY and if he still presently feels the same or has an opinion of why JR has not put forth the effort to make himself available in person for LE to question, give DNA sample, and LDT as we know some of the others have..
Just wondering..
And on more than one occasion he has made statements alluding to the involvement of JW..
He first stated that he hoped that LE took seriously and followed up on the direction and leads/info that his client provided to LE..IMO indicating that he and his client possibly had a good idea of who was responsible..
He later made a statement that CR/MB also had fully cooperated with meeting withbLE as well as immediately providing DNA.. He said that he was in contact with both MB and JR's Attys and that those 3 were absolutely NOT in any way involved with Laurens disappearance.. When asked about JW he could not comment.. IMO again somewhat alluding to JW being somehow responsible..
And then again he makes a statement that he certainly hopes that LE are going in the direction of the info that his client had provided and follows it up by stating that 90% of the time the responsible party is someone the victim was intimately involved with.. Again IMO once more alluding to JW being the party responsible..
Wonder how much he's talked with JRs ATTY and if he still presently feels the same or has an opinion of why JR has not put forth the effort to make himself available in person for LE to question, give DNA sample, and LDT as we know some of the others have..
Just wondering..