"incestuous" images found on JP's computer in Utah

According to the detective on this case these were not cartoon-like or character like images at all. They were computer generated HUMANS and realistic life like images depicting parental incest. The detective stated that this made them even more disturbing. This was not anime or cartoon characters. This was computer generated people.

And JP was a computer programmer.
 
Computer-generated or cartoon depictions of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 are considered child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 per federal law: 18 USC 1466A.

Well, it's helps, but not all cartoon depictions of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 are illegal according to that statute. That statute came after one of the Ashcroft cases where the previous statute was really broad and swept into it a lot of stuff - cartoons, written material. The Supreme Court struck it down, so they came up with the statute you referenced. The cartoon images have to be "obscene." By its construction, not all simulated child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 is illegal, only those materials that are obscene or lacking value. So, say Lolita or a film which deals with child trafficking, if animated, written, etc. wouldn't get swept up into this statute.

Given the subject matter of what was found, I'm guessing that it'd be considered obscene under the statute, but not all animated material is.
 
Dear God. It just keeps getting worse. That sick, evil waste of humanity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I think the boys were starting to open up with the Coxes and they were becoming a threat to JP and perhaps even his dad. :(

ITA ~n/t~, To remove a THREAT is often why people kill.

We learned this here during the Scott Peterson case
 
Steven Powell Probable Cause Statement 22 SEPTEMBER 2011

http://www.scribd.com/doc/66095524/Probable-Cause-Statement-involving-Steven-Powell


***EXPLICIT CONTENT***
Description of crimes .

{Some excerpts from links}
These are from the link at top. The documents at lower link are similar - but not identical.

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:7xVU09xLv4wJ:www.abc4.com/media/lib/5/5/3/a/53a12909-6e23-4772-891e-34393ef8c051/PowellPC.pdf+steven+powell+probabale+cause&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESixZEYx3pWCIroYW4ssedXGXwvwa4AnlJyQ1xKCq-Ds_dIRZNLXAG_PZOpn_6uYFQxJ7cbtI9jl_Fo9z1iijhxpEsgwLMC1bsvOSlJshMH6cXragba_FnypHXtuhA04I8cfCxgF&sig=AHIEtbQTLqtoYuxrYRROXK5jp7G8GPONbg
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    122.8 KB · Views: 459
  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    183.3 KB · Views: 471
  • Capture3.PNG
    Capture3.PNG
    62.9 KB · Views: 466
I wish I had not read the above document. Terrifying!

Ages from about 7 to 14.

Some of Susan.

Thousands of images of females being videotaped without their knowledge.

There were also 8mm cassettes, compact discs, and VHS seized- nothing about what was on those in the document. This was just the probable cause warrant, not all that was found. OMG!

I know this is not as bad as some of the Federal cases I have seen, but it is very bad. A reminder to keep curtains and shades pulled. I don't know how to block out creepy neighbors from seeing in completely, but try.
 
Some references still remain online to the time around the folder of files was discovered on Steven's computer. The folder was viewed by people who had no idea what they were going to be viewing - then commented on what they had seen. They describe it is as a webpage or folder filled with many files when opened - like a parent directory. The few who did view the files - it is clear from the posts which still remain - cursed what they saw and quit.
 
Some references still remain online to the time around the folder of files was discovered on Steven's computer. The folder was viewed by people who had no idea what they were going to be viewing - then commented on what they had seen. They describe it is as a webpage or folder filled with many files when opened - like a parent directory. The few who did view the files - it is clear from the posts which still remain - cursed what they saw and quit.

Do you mean LE viewing them?
 
Is anyone else wondering what "incestuous" means in this instance? It could mean Josh and the kids, or it could mean Josh and other family members. My mind is going in strange directions here.

I just hope the family doesn't blame the internet, LE, or the media for this latest news. No one made JP do any of these acts, and each one seems worse than the next.

ITA! I was so incensed to read JP's cousin stating that JP was cyber-bullied and that led to this! Seriously? GMAB! I wonder what his sister will have to say when the shock wears off? I think there are a lot of skeletons in the family closet. JMO
 
KevinKIRO Kevin McCarty
"incestuous images" on #joshpowell computer is animated video of 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 according to source. #FindSusan


Didn't know it was video.
 
Okay, so he had an open viewing. Why is he not charged (yet) with circulating it?

I am not sure if that was the case - it may have been something like storing them on a cloud. My favorites alphabetized themself - now I am just going by memory - which is only so-so. When I find the link of where I read this original information - that will be better.


These are his current charges. There is a Cox vs Steven Powell Case as well. Also he may have charges out of different jurisdictions.

https://linxonline.co.pierce.wa.us/linxweb/Case/CriminalCase.cfm?cause_num=11-1-03893-1
 
Is anyone else wondering what "incestuous" means in this instance? It could mean Josh and the kids, or it could mean Josh and other family members. My mind is going in strange directions here.

I just hope the family doesn't blame the internet, LE, or the media for this latest news. No one made JP do any of these acts, and each one seems worse than the next.

I am wondering too, but I have thought for a long time the family tree is a very "close" one. Guess we are going to find out that indeed it is/was, and will not be shocked, just saddened and sickened.
 
Oh - I don't know if this has been mentioned here.
Long also told the judge that Josh Powell has admitted that he takes photos of people's legs in public without their knowledge.
John Long, who is representing the Washington state Children's Administration, made additional arguments Wednesday about why the children should not be living in the home with Josh and Steven Powell. He said Josh's mentally disabled brother has answered the door in the nude in the past and is often nude inside the home.
{Sorry - oldish article from 28 SEPTEMBER 2011}
Link
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=960&sid=17436323
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
207
Guests online
470
Total visitors
677

Forum statistics

Threads
625,758
Messages
18,509,355
Members
240,838
Latest member
MNigh_ShyamaLADD
Back
Top