Inconsistencies in DB's Story

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

yep, and we are all in on it I guess

And don't forget Starbucks must be in on it too since they needed the store rewired THAT night. :waitasec:

 

[melissasmom]

And don't forget Starbucks must be in on it too since they needed the store rewired THAT night. :waitasec:

Oh Snap! I never thought of that. Starbucks has lots of money too to help participate in the plan and coverup.

 

[hambirg]

Probably because it is a body of water not that far from the house. They searched MANY places.

I disagree. They searched specific places. There are lots of parks and places to put a baby that weren't searched that are just as close. There has not been one search to the south of the river, as far as I know. Why not search over there if you are just randomly searching areas near the home? What makes them think that a body of water is significant? BL could be anywhere if she was taken by an intruder.

 

[Whisperer]

Mark Fuhrman and many other Professional people are leaning towards the parent/s ' guilt. I would tend to believe people who worked in the field and know these types of people and their behaviors.

Then again, there are still people thinking OJ is innocent.

 

[Whisperer]

LE was there when Jeremy was running over to the neighbors and calling 911? That's pretty amazing they know to get there before a call is even made.

...:waiting:

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

I disagree. They searched specific places. There are lots of parks and places to put a baby that weren't searched that are just as close. There has not been one search to the south of the river, as far as I know. Why not search over there if you are just randomly searching areas near the home? What makes them think that a body of water is significant? BL could be anywhere if she was taken by an intruder.

Wouldn't any place that LE searches be a specific place? :waitasec:

 

[Whisperer]

I disagree. They searched specific places. There are lots of parks and places to put a baby that weren't searched that are just as close. There has not been one search to the south of the river, as far as I know. Why not search over there if you are just randomly searching areas near the home? What makes them think that a body of water is significant? BL could be anywhere if she was taken by an intruder.

Didn't they do TWO searches in back of that chicken restaurant? Did DB get her chicken their? What was the connection?

...can't recall, maybe it was a neighbor that worked there.

 

[In da Middle]

Didn't they do TWO searches in back of that chicken restaurant? Did DB get her chicken their? What was the connection?

...can't recall, maybe it was a neighbor that worked there.

The kid that said Jersey did it for $300 worked there. Seems to me that LE thought more of his story than he let on.

 

[melissasmom]

Mark Fuhrman and many other Professional people are leaning towards the parent/s ' guilt. I would tend to believe people who worked in the field and know these types of people and their behaviors.

Then again, there are still people thinking OJ is innocent.

I have no idea what Mark Fuhrman said about this case, but his is definitely an opinion I can disregard. What other professional people have said they think the parents' are guilty of something?

 

[norest4thewicked]

As far as the neighbors go, I'm quite sure that there are things that they know that others don't know, however I do know that there exists a possibility of a lot of rumors going on in that group just like those of us who are not familiar. I don't understand though that if you are a neighbor who believes that DB is not involved, then why aren't you afraid of a stranger coming into your home and taking something from you? This puzzles me unless the neighbors think that Jersey is the one who took Lisa and he is in jail. If they thought that JB was involved, and he still lives there, wouldn't that make you kind of worried? I mean, if it was JB, I guess they feel that this was done as retaliation. I just don't buy that one. Another idea would be someone in the family who didn't think that DB was doing a good job as a mom or that they didn't like her. But, then, if that were the case, why would Ashley and Mike LeRett come to help? I'm just really curious about the feeling in the neighborhood.

 

[Salem]

I guess there are a lot of liars who live in KC, huh? :waitasec:

yep, and we are all in on it I guess

And don't forget Starbucks must be in on it too since they needed the store rewired THAT night. :waitasec:

LE was there when Jeremy was running over to the neighbors and calling 911? That's pretty amazing they know to get there before a call is even made.

Oh Snap! I never thought of that. Starbucks has lots of money too to help participate in the plan and coverup.

...:waiting:

Wouldn't any place that LE searches be a specific place? :waitasec:

What the heck is all this sarcasm and bullying? Where in the TOS does it say it is permissible to treat your fellow posters like this?

Take this nonsense off the forum, NOW. There have been so many Mod Warnings posted in this thread it is unbelievable. Get a GRIP! Please start acting like adults here. If you have nothing to contribute to the discussion but sarcasm and rudeness, then take a break or the mods will start handing out mandatory breaks.

If you have questions or concerns - pm a mod and they will address them.

Thanks,

Salem

 

[cityslick]

As on November, they had four..quite a feat in the world of parents of missing babies.

What 4, lawyers? Who were the other two? <modsnip>

 

[vlpate]

It could of been a simple question of:

While you were watching tv and while your mommy was outside, did you see/hear your baby sister? I think the older boy would be able to answer this with some sort of clarity, especially in the first interview.

Also, to clarify, that 2nd interview came a month later, not two. Also, the interviewer was an FBI appointed person, with years of experience.

The child specialist was an FBI appointed person? The FBI was there, but the child specialist was not appointed by the FBI - unless you have a link showing otherwise?

More absence of common sense http://www.kctv5.com/story/16012022/interviews-with-brothers
"Stanton said he has not spoken to the boys about what they may have heard or seen the night their sister went missing. He said their parents have not either indepth because they did not want to be seen as coaching the boys or tampering with the investigation.

"I did not want to get in the way of the investigation," he said."
_________________
So the interviews were continually cancelled - putting off any information that boys may have because they didn't want to coach or hamper the investigation? Does this make sense when your baby is missing???
_________________
http://fox4kc.com/2011/11/10/authorities-now-interviewing-lisa-irwins-brothers/
"Picerno says the FBI requested the delay to give it time to schedule the special forensics expert who is interviewing the half-brothers."

While this is probably true, it is also probably because the defense team was insisting on the child specialist Tacopina had worked with before....IMO He mentioned having worked with this specialist in the past. I'm trying to find that interview - anyone else hear this?

 

[In da Middle]

As far as the neighbors go, I'm quite sure that there are things that they know that others don't know, however I do know that there exists a possibility of a lot of rumors going on in that group just like those of us who are not familiar. I don't understand though that if you are a neighbor who believes that DB is not involved, then why aren't you afraid of a stranger coming into your home and taking something from you? This puzzles me unless the neighbors think that Jersey is the one who took Lisa and he is in jail. If they thought that JB was involved, and he still lives there, wouldn't that make you kind of worried? I mean, if it was JB, I guess they feel that this was done as retaliation. I just don't buy that one. Another idea would be someone in the family who didn't think that DB was doing a good job or that they didn't like her. But, then, if that were the case, why would Ashley and Mike LeRett come to help? I'm just really curious about the feeling in the neighborhood.

Speaking for myself, if it was an abduction I am sure it was not a stranger to them. I do not know anybody in their circle so I am not too concerned. I would rather it be the parents be the guilty ones because it would be an isolated incident. An abduction means it is more possible that this person could do it again to anybody, anywhere if they felt like it. I am not convinced either way who did it but I would RATHER it be the parents, myself.

 

[beach]

What the heck is all this sarcasm and bullying? Where in the TOS does it say it is permissible to treat your fellow posters like this?

Take this nonsense off the forum, NOW. There have been so many Mod Warnings posted in this thread it is unbelievable. Get a GRIP! Please start acting like adults here. If you have nothing to contribute to the discussion but sarcasm and rudeness, then take a break or the mods will start handing out mandatory breaks.

If you have questions or concerns - pm a mod and they will address them.

Thanks,

Salem

Time Outs are next. And they will NOT be 24 hour TOs.

 

[cityslick]

I can speak for myself. I can speak for those I know who have lost their child. Rolling around on the floor and not calling LE immediately is NOT the norm or the initial reaction. You jump into action when your child is hurt or missing. If Lisa was bleeding, would she just lay there on the floor screaming, crying? NO. no loving parent does that. They help their child.

It seems to be one excuse after another each time a new behavior is introduced.

They didn't know she was missing at first.

 

[SyraKelly]

The fact of the matter is-and this is MOO -DB has made some very inconsistent statements since this whole thing started..Whether you believe her or not is up to you-I choose not to believe her-I think her story will eventually fall apart with a slip of the tongue.It may be tomorrow or next yr..who knows..but it will be her words that will be the cause of hers and JI demise- JMO-of course

 

[Sparklin]

Did she just misstate here too?

JI: “I returned home from work at around 4 a.m., and windows were open and lights were on, and she was nowhere to be found.”

Reporter: “Right there, that’s so unusual. The window’s open, the lights on. That wouldn’t be normal at all?”

DB: “No.”

Post 21
compare the parent's statements to media here - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

So DB leaving the nightlight and the stove light on wouldn't be normal? She sure made it sound like on Dr.Phil that it was pretty normal and it wasn't anything alarming. MOO

Deb might have originally thought that when Jeremy said 'all the lights' that there were more on than just the lights she left on and that he turned them off on his way into bed. By the time they discussed it and realized that it was actually just the few lights (possibly one/or two more than normal) it was already blown out of proportion. If Deb had the overhead lights on and Sam and Shane were standing in Sams yard, they would have seen the lights go out even if it was just the glow from the window dimming.

 

[highflyer]

As a former news reporter, I can answer this for you with certainty. Many out of town news media rewrite other people's stories and the accuracy suffers. Instead of giving credit to the reporter and their organization, they want to make it look like they got the information. KSPR in Springfield, MO and a TV station in Florida (NBC affiliate) comes to mind in this case most prominently.

Brings to mind rich people, football players and ex-girlfriends.

 

[Sparklin]

And as to the "homey family meal" -- I believe this was "made up" by DB as an "AFTER THOUGHT" the "wine run" story came out ... :waitasec: I wonder what they all for dinner that night ? Does she remember what they ate ?

:doh: That's right ... Deb would not remember what was for dinner because she was "drunk" -- and this came straight from Deb ...

All JMO ... and MOO ...

sbm-bbm = chicken