Insanity!

[joe jones]

His confession places him in Boulder. Hence, if his handwriting matches the ranson note that corroborates his confession.

That is all the D.A. needs: Case is over.

what confession,

I was there, it was an accident, that would be laughed out of court,

he has IMO confessed to nothing, he has made some bizarre statements so far,

 

[englishleigh]

He is not in anybodys custody at the moment, he has not been charged with anything to do with Jon Benet,

this was the fastest way to get him back to the US, the Thai authorites deported him as an undesirable, so until he lands in California he can live it up a little,

when he gets on US soil he will be taken into custody, I think to give the Boulder DA more time to get her evidence he will be arrested for the misdemeanour child offences,

thus California can hold onto him, until and if the DA in Boulder decides to arrest him and take him to Boulder,

he also may not waive extradition to Boulder, so she will have to get an extradition order, who knows what he will do,

but Boulder need time to check out DNA, his alibi, etc in order to decide how to proceed,

Yes, I heard CA is going to take him into custody on the charges but there are Colorado officials waiting on him in L.A, to begin questioning him about the JBR case.

 

[michelle]

what confession,

I was there, it was an accident, that would be laughed out of court,

he has IMO confessed to nothing, he has made some bizarre statements so far,

I agree, while I wish he was the perp and there would be justice, I am just not sure. He is not playing with a full deck and I dont know what his agenda is.

 

[michelle]

Someone said they saw it on The Lineup with Kim Guilefoyle last night, that a handwriting expert out of NY has declared the handwriting a match.

Oh I had not heard that. That is intersting though. I am going to google some info and see what I can find on it, Thanks.

 

[englishleigh]

They keep showing liveshots of LAX on Fox, I guess we'll see his plane actually land in Los Angeles live...I can't wait to get this guy back on USA soil. That's when the news will start rolling in thick and fast.

 

[Wudge]

Dont they need some kind of other link, I mean didnt his wife say he was with her on the holiday?

Karr confessed to being with Jon Benet when she died. Thus, any well regarded corroborating evidence of his presence in Boulder would seal a conviction sans exonerating evidence from the defense.

If his former wife has a photo or video that showed Karr was with her Xmas day, 1996, then Karr falsely confessed. However, his former wife has had four days to locate any such evidence, and her attorney did not sound like he was expecting any such photos to be forthcoming.

 

[michelle]

any well regarded corroborating evidence of his presence in Boulder would seal a conviction sans exonerating evidence from the defense.

.

I agree with that.

 

[guppy]

Karr confessed to being with Jon Benet when she died. Thus, any well regarded corroborating evidence of his presence in Boulder would seal a conviction sans exonerating evidence from the defense.

If his former wife has a photo or video that showed Karr was with her Xmas day, 1996, then Karr falsely confessed. However, his former wife has had four days to locate any such evidence, and her attorney did not sound like he was expecting any such photos to be forthcoming.

I suspect many of Karr's pictures are in a landfill somewhere, and have been for some time.

 

[MrsMush99]

If his former wife has a photo or video that showed Karr was with her Xmas day, 1996, then Karr falsely confessed. However, his former wife has had four days to locate any such evidence, and her attorney did not sound like he was expecting any such photos to be forthcoming.

I actually heard her defense attorney say something to the effect that she's going to try and locate photos and that she said that he was with her because off the top of her head she could not remember him not being there for a Christmas holiday, however in this interview that he gave he did not sound like she seemed so sure anymore, without him actually saying that. Did I make any sense at all?? I'm going to have to start writing this stuff down that I hear.

 

[joe jones]

Karr confessed to being with Jon Benet when she died. Thus, any well regarded corroborating evidence of his presence in Boulder would seal a conviction sans exonerating evidence from the defense.

If his former wife has a photo or video that showed Karr was with her Xmas day, 1996, then Karr falsely confessed. However, his former wife has had four days to locate any such evidence, and her attorney did not sound like he was expecting any such photos to be forthcoming.

So if we believe his statements that he was with her we must believe his further statement it was an accident,

can't have one without the other,

those bizarre press conference statements will have no bearing on this case, a decent defence atty will soon have them supressed, esp if he was taken to the press conference against his will,

 

[Wudge]

I suspect many of Karr's pictures are in a landfill somewhere, and have been for some time.

Guppy, it would be a another tragedy if Karr falsely confessed and evidence that could prove such was destroyed.

At a minimum, a confession takes a prosecutor right to the goal line. They seldom fail to score after that. It's one of the very worst situations for a defense attorney.

 

[FULTON]

If it's true that the NY handwriting expert says his writing and the ransom note writing are a match, and he can be placed in CO (since an education/teaching file in CO has his name on it), we're getting closer to some real, serious evidence here. He is incredibly creepy and I, too, believe he may be evil. His eyes look cold and dead to me.

Can your source where the NY expert said this?????

 

[MrsMush99]

those bizarre press conference statements will have no bearing on this case, a decent defence atty will soon have them supressed, esp if he was taken to the press conference against his will,

I heard he wanted to give the press conference, no one forced him. He even wanted to give another one to say he never said he drugged JonBenet and he never said he picked her up from school.

 

[Wudge]

So if we believe his statements that he was with her we must believe his further statement it was an accident,

can't have one without the other,

Your logic is highly fallacious. I would hope you can recognize that.

 

[joe jones]

I actually heard her defense attorney say something to the effect that she's going to try and locate photos and that she said that he was with her because off the top of her head she could not remember him not being there for a Christmas holiday, however in this interview that he gave he did not sound like she seemed so sure anymore, without him actually saying that. Did I make any sense at all?? I'm going to have to start writing this stuff down that I hear.

It won't just be the ex wife who will be his alibi, nobody lives in a bubble, so other family members, friends, neighbours etc all will be asked for any video, photos, memories of presents recieved at Christmas 1996 from John Karr,

with it being around Christmas time if he has a decent alibi it will be easier to corroborate, as most people take some photos,

and to get from Alabama to Boulder is not a few hours trip, he had to be gone at least two days to get their and back, and one day was Christmas day,
so to me I would think what age were the children in 96, then try to recall what we bought them that year, then try to recall any memories of Dad playing with the children with these new toys,

most families can remember the year somebody got the red bike, or the yesr somebody got the toy kitchen etc,

I don't think her alibi evidence can be discounted even without documented proof, as Christmas times with a family are memories stored forever,

and somebody would be able to remember the year Dad was away, I know I can recall most Christmas memories by recalling the age I was and the giftts me and my siblings recieved,

 

[joe jones]

Your logic is highly fallacious. I would hope you can recognize that.

to me it seems perfectly logical, he is either credible or not,

you can't pick and choose what to believe because it fits what you want it to fit,

IMO he carefully chose his words,

 

[joe jones]

I heard he wanted to give the press conference, no one forced him. He even wanted to give another one to say he never said he drugged JonBenet and he never said he picked her up from school.

It has to be confirmed he wanted to go to the press conference, the media are spinning this story so hard they don't know what is up or down,

when he finally gets a defence atty then maybe we will have a clearer picture of what is going on,

 

[englishleigh]

Can your source where the NY expert said this?????

Someone on another thread posted that they heard this last night on The Lineup on Fox.

 

[Wudge]

Someone on another thread posted that they heard this last night on The Lineup on Fox.

Fox reported that a newspaper had hired a handwriting expert, and they said that Karr's handwriting matches the ransom note.

 

[joe jones]

Someone on another thread posted that they heard this last night on The Lineup on Fox.

I heard it too, but it is spurious as he took a sample of John Karr from his year book to compare to the ransom note, without John Karr saying yes I wrote that in the year book, to do a proper comparison you have to know for sure that what you have is a true known sample of somebodies handwriting,

and you need different samples, and alot of handwriting,

it is why Patsey and John Ramsey were asked to give more than one sample when they were being investigated as the source of the handwriting on the ransom note,