Interview with Mike Thompson

  • #141
Does it ever run through anyone else's mind that the parents are cooperating with LE, but we just aren't hearing about it? Everyone is so, so silent on this case, not just the parents. I can't seem to get it out of my head that LE knows way more than they are letting on, actually working with DB and JI, and it's part of the plan to make people think the parents are their first suspects when in fact they are just trying to draw out the real perp?
 
  • #142
Does it ever run through anyone else's mind that the parents are cooperating with LE, but we just aren't hearing about it? Everyone is so, so silent on this case, not just the parents. I can't seem to get it out of my head that LE knows way more than they are letting on, actually working with DB and JI, and it's part of the plan to make people think the parents are their first suspects when in fact they are just trying to draw out the real perp?
Nope, it certainly doesn't run through my mind.
 
  • #143
Does it ever run through anyone else's mind that the parents are cooperating with LE, but we just aren't hearing about it? Everyone is so, so silent on this case, not just the parents. I can't seem to get it out of my head that LE knows way more than they are letting on, actually working with DB and JI, and it's part of the plan to make people think the parents are their first suspects when in fact they are just trying to draw out the real perp?

Nope. Local DT has been upfront that they are pretty much dealing with the FBI, not KCPD. I have no reason not to believe everything the defense attorneys and everyone else has said...police zeroed in on Debbie Bradley from the get go.
 
  • #144
The thing I find most interesting in this new blog is that Mr. Brando is living back next door to the Irwin's. Apparently SB and he are divorced now. So where is SB?

Besides the parents, she has been the person I am most suspicious of. She is the only one in all of this that fits the profile of somebody who would take a baby.

There is just something about her behavior. . .keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

Hmmmm. . .:waitasec:


I think SB fits a pretty good suspect profile. I'm not sure how much info on her we're allowed to discuss, but she should be one of the usual suspects. JI sure ran straight to her house, why would he do that?

:seeya:

JMO ... but I do not believe that SB took Lisa. I know we have heard nothing from her -- but I am just not seeing her involved in taking the baby.

Now ... what I do see is that SB knows what really happened that night at the Bradley/Irwin home. And she's not talking -- now WHY is she NOT talking ?

I am sure she spoke to LE ... but was it the TRUTH or was she helping DB "cover up" something ? And IF she helped with a "cover-up" then that would explain her silence -- :waitasec: or maybe DB has "something" to hold over her ? SPECULATING here ...

SB knows WHO was there that night Lisa went "missing" ...

SB knows IF she saw Lisa that night -- or IF she DID NOT SEE Lisa that night ...

SB knows IF there were other "goodies" :innocent: other than "boxed wine" at the house that night ...

:waitasec: Maybe SB saw and/or heard something that happened to Lisa that night ...

Yes, there is something not "adding up" about SB ... but I do not believe she "kidnapped" the baby because of the HRD HIT in DB's bedroom, the "missing cell phones", DB and JI "lawyering up" with not just 1 but 2 defense lawyers ... it goes on and on ...

One other point -- a BIG IF Deborah even "suspected" that SB had something to do with "kidnapping" Lisa -- DB would be "screaming it from the rooftops" ...

MOO ...
 
  • #145
:seeya:

JMO ... but I do not believe that SB took Lisa. I know we have heard nothing from her -- but I am just not seeing her involved in taking the baby.

Now ... what I do see is that SB knows what really happened that night at the Bradley/Irwin home. And she's not talking -- now WHY is she NOT talking ?

I am sure she spoke to LE ... but was it the TRUTH or was she helping DB "cover up" something ? And IF she helped with a "cover-up" then that would explain her silence -- :waitasec: or maybe DB has "something" to hold over her ? SPECULATING here ...

SB knows WHO was there that night Lisa went "missing" ...

SB knows IF she saw Lisa that night -- or IF she DID NOT SEE Lisa that night ...

SB knows IF there were other "goodies" :innocent: other than "boxed wine" at the house that night ...

:waitasec: Maybe SB saw and/or heard something that happened to Lisa that night ...

Yes, there is something not "adding up" about SB ... but I do not believe she "kidnapped" the baby because of the HRD HIT in DB's bedroom, the "missing cell phones", DB and JI "lawyering up" with not just 1 but 2 defense lawyers ... it goes on and on ...

One other point -- a BIG IF Deborah even "suspected" that SB had something to do with "kidnapping" Lisa -- DB would be "screaming it from the rooftops" ...

MOO ...

You admitted yourself that you are basing your suspicions on the dog hit and evidence that may or may not even exist re: lab/CSI results. Your (and seemingly everyone else's) evidence is the dog hit. Their behavior after the fact and the missing phones doesn't prove DB murdered her baby. It doesn't explain how/why/when. It doesn't explain the call to MW. It doesn't explain anything. Nor does it point to her.

LE is in the same exact boat, hence why they are not even suspects at this point. Heck, they did more searching and forensics at Ayla Reynolds house than they did at DB's.

It's said that the parents can't be cleared, fine. I agree. But every single story that points away from the parents shouldn't get poopooed either. I'm sure LE did investigate MT's story. Let's not call the guy out for reporting a tip, even if it goes against your suspicion.
 
  • #146
If LE doesn't know anything more than we do at this point they should all be fired.
By now they should be rowing at least a couple of boat lengths ahead of us.

JMO.
 
  • #147
You admitted yourself that you are basing your suspicions on the dog hit and evidence that may or may not even exist re: lab/CSI results. Your (and seemingly everyone else's) evidence is the dog hit. Their behavior after the fact and the missing phones doesn't prove DB murdered her baby. It doesn't explain how/why/when. It doesn't explain the call to MW. It doesn't explain anything. Nor does it point to her.

LE is in the same exact boat, hence why they are not even suspects at this point. Heck, they did more searching and forensics at Ayla Reynolds house than they did at DB's.

It's said that the parents can't be cleared, fine. I agree. But every single story that points away from the parents shouldn't get poopooed either. I'm sure LE did investigate MT's story. Let's not call the guy out for reporting a tip, even if it goes against your suspicion.


RBBM: Ah ... the Lab Results ... we have not heard about the Lab Results -- sure wish we would ...

But could it be that the Lab is "backed up" ? The CSI Team searched that house for hours ... even x-rayed the interior ...

See these snippets from : http://www.kansascity.com/2011/12/28/3348273/families-mourn-homicide-victims.html

Kansas City ended 2011 with 114 homicides, the city’s highest tally in three years and a 7.5 percent increase from 2010.

Detectives worked nine double homicides and two triple homicides. That’s 24 deaths — four times as many as the city recorded through multiple killings in 2010.

It looks to me like KC LE has their "hands full" ...


RBBM: As for the parents NOT being cleared -- that is THEIR FAULT -- DB and JI made that decision ... IF they had nothing to do with Lisa being "missing", then DB and JI should "high tail" into LE's offices and do anything and everything they can do clear themselves ...

But they have NOT and do NOT seem to be in the least bit interested. :waitasec: That's right -- they "lawyered up" -- not just 1 attorney but 2 defense attorneys ...


RBBM: I am sure LE did investigate Thompson's "sighting" -- and LE should investigate Thompson's "story ...

I am not "calling him out" for reporting a "tip" -- what I see from reading and listening to all of Thompson's interviews is that he repeatedly "changed" and/or "added info" to his "story".

And that is why I have trouble believing Thompson -- as well as any other "eye witness sightings" ...

MOO ...

:seeya:
 
  • #148
If LE doesn't know anything more than we do at this point they should all be fired.
By now they should be rowing at least a couple of boat lengths ahead of us.

JMO.


JMO ... but I think LE does know more than they have told the public ...

It seems that LE seems to be keeping their "lips sealed" ... and not just in this case, but in a lot of cases ...

JMO ... but they need the "body" ... sorry, I really did not want to be so blunt.

MOO
 
  • #149
You admitted yourself that you are basing your suspicions on the dog hit and evidence that may or may not even exist re: lab/CSI results. Your (and seemingly everyone else's) evidence is the dog hit. Their behavior after the fact and the missing phones doesn't prove DB murdered her baby. It doesn't explain how/why/when. It doesn't explain the call to MW. It doesn't explain anything. Nor does it point to her.

LE is in the same exact boat, hence why they are not even suspects at this point. Heck, they did more searching and forensics at Ayla Reynolds house than they did at DB's.

It's said that the parents can't be cleared, fine. I agree. But every single story that points away from the parents shouldn't get poopooed either. I'm sure LE did investigate MT's story. Let's not call the guy out for reporting a tip, even if it goes against your suspicion.
:waitasec:


How many things point away from the parents? We have one witness who say a man carrying a baby @ 4:00am. We have another who's having his wife explain what he saw. We have a dialed phone call (not complted) which may or may not be a wrong number. There is no doubt these were investigated to the full extent...and then some. They have nothing, no leads. They have a handyman in custody but it is no help.

Now, the evidence that points towards the parents.
1. Lawyering up within a few days of baby missing
2. Refusing to be interviewed separately
3. Drunken mother who things she may have passed out
4. Clothes removed as evidence of what Lisa was supposed to be wearing
5. Mother who never checked on sick baby for ten hours
6. Cadaver dog hit in bdrm
7. mother fails poly
8. no evidence of JI wanting to take poly since Oct
9. No pleas for child from anyone in family
10. no evidence of an abduction
11. monitor on, but mother doesn't hear a thing
12. Their dog doesn't bark
13. No evidence of parents trying to be cleared so case can move forward

.....No wonder the public thinks they're guilty. The Town's people should be arriving with torches and pitchforks, imo.
 
  • #150
RBBM: Ah ... the Lab Results ... we have not heard about the Lab Results -- sure wish we would ...

But could it be that the Lab is "backed up" ? The CSI Team searched that house for hours ... even x-rayed the interior ...

See these snippets from : http://www.kansascity.com/2011/12/28/3348273/families-mourn-homicide-victims.html

Kansas City ended 2011 with 114 homicides, the city’s highest tally in three years and a 7.5 percent increase from 2010.

Detectives worked nine double homicides and two triple homicides. That’s 24 deaths — four times as many as the city recorded through multiple killings in 2010.

It looks to me like KC LE has their "hands full" ...


:seeya:

The crime lab processed some time ago all the relevant, major significant evidence in this case. There is no backup in this case.
 
  • #151
You admitted yourself that you are basing your suspicions on the dog hit and evidence that may or may not even exist re: lab/CSI results. Your (and seemingly everyone else's) evidence is the dog hit. Their behavior after the fact and the missing phones doesn't prove DB murdered her baby. It doesn't explain how/why/when. It doesn't explain the call to MW. It doesn't explain anything. Nor does it point to her.

LE is in the same exact boat, hence why they are not even suspects at this point. Heck, they did more searching and forensics at Ayla Reynolds house than they did at DB's.

It's said that the parents can't be cleared, fine. I agree. But every single story that points away from the parents shouldn't get poopooed either. I'm sure LE did investigate MT's story. Let's not call the guy out for reporting a tip, even if it goes against your suspicion.

To my kge, no one had hired attorneys right away in that case up there. LE was able to go in there and really look around right away. Did that family give specifics of how they believed the intruder entered? Lisa's parents did and steered them in that direction...having LE concentrate on a window as an entry point.

I believe LE would have solved the Irwin case if not for four different criminal defense attorneys stepping in. BTW, they are suspects but are unable to announce it because of legal restraints. We live in a politically correct society and LE is always a target for Hired Guns. More children are being murdered and it is getting increasingly difficult to charge the perp.

LE needs to be able to come down hard on those closest to the victim. Too bad they are not even allowed to do that anymore w/o a slick attorney willing to charge the officers with being mean to their client.

These babies rights/lives don't matter to some defense attorneys...Have you noticed?
 
  • #152
The crime lab processed some time ago all the relevant, major significant evidence in this case. There is no backup in this case.


BBM: Do you have a link to this ? TIA !

And, do you have any links that there is a NO backup in this case ?


So ... as to "there is no backup in the case" -- this is how I made this "assumption" that it is possible there is back-up:

I was reading a "comment" in a "blog section" of a website which I am NOT allowed to quote here because of the TOS ... And this person who "commented" stated that there was a back-up in the labs because of the high murder rate in K City ... while this person did not state WHO they worked for, it was obvious this person had "knowledge" of "something" ...

I was curious -- so when I did a search on K City, I found an article about the high murder rate ...

Another thought : Lab results can take days, weeks, months and even years to come back ... NOT to be snarky but this is REAL LIFE -- NOT television CSI shows ...

MOO ...
 
  • #153
:waitasec:


How many things point away from the parents? We have one witness who say a man carrying a baby @ 4:00am. We have another who's having his wife explain what he saw. We have a dialed phone call (not complted) which may or may not be a wrong number. There is no doubt these were investigated to the full extent...and then some. They have nothing, no leads. They have a handyman in custody but it is no help.

Now, the evidence that points towards the parents.
1. Lawyering up within a few days of baby missing
2. Refusing to be interviewed separately
3. Drunken mother who things she may have passed out
4. Clothes removed as evidence of what Lisa was supposed to be wearing
5. Mother who never checked on sick baby for ten hours
6. Cadaver dog hit in bdrm
7. mother fails poly
8. no evidence of JI wanting to take poly since Oct
9. No pleas for child from anyone in family
10. no evidence of an abduction
11. monitor on, but mother doesn't hear a thing
12. Their dog doesn't bark
13. No evidence of parents trying to be cleared so case can move forward

.....No wonder the public thinks they're guilty. The Town's people should be arriving with torches and pitchforks, imo.

What you consider evidence, I do not. Let's go through your list.

1. Lawyering up within a few days of baby missing
Not evidence of a crime
2. Refusing to be interviewed separately
Not evidence of a crime
3. Drunken mother who things she may have passed out
Not evidence she harmed her child
4. Clothes removed as evidence of what Lisa was supposed to be wearing
Not sure how that automatically counts as evidence against the parents
5. Mother who never checked on sick baby for ten hours
Evidence of neglect, not murder
6. Cadaver dog hit in bdrm
Evidence!!!
7. mother fails poly
According to DB herself, which may or may not be the truth as it has never been confirmed by LE
8. no evidence of JI wanting to take poly since Oct
But yet there was evidence of LE not required one of him immediately after BL went missing, which is the best time to do a LDT
9. No pleas for child from anyone in family
Evidence of being bad parents, uncaring, not murder
10. no evidence of an abduction
The only way you know this is if you know evidence that LE has that does not point to an abduction
11. monitor on, but mother doesn't hear a thing
Was the monitor on when she went to sleep? Is this linked somewhere?
12. Their dog doesn't bark
Wasn't the dog in the back? Who said the intruder went through the back?
13. No evidence of parents trying to be cleared so case can move forward
This is standard procedure until either a perp is caught or confesses

Finally, the town was showing up with the torches and pitchforks. They were calling it a vigil so they asked them to get off their lawn.
 
  • #154
To my kge, no one had hired attorneys right away in that case up there. LE was able to go in there and really look around right away. Did that family give specifics of how they believed the intruder entered? Lisa's parents did and steered them in that direction...having LE concentrate on a window as an entry point.

I believe LE would have solved the Irwin case if not for four different criminal defense attorneys stepping in. BTW, they are suspects but are unable to announce it because of legal restraints. We live in a politically correct society and LE is always a target for Hired Guns. More children are being murdered and it is getting increasingly difficult to charge the perp.

LE needs to be able to come down hard on those closest to the victim. Too bad they are not even allowed to do that anymore w/o a slick attorney willing to charge the officers with being mean to their client.

These babies rights/lives don't matter to some defense attorneys...Have you noticed?

If you believe that only defense attorneys cause cases to go unsolved, I'll kindly point you to the missing persons forum and you can see how many cases are there where the person has not been found. In many of those, there is no defense attorney.
 
  • #155
BBM: Do you have a link to this ? TIA !

And, do you have any links that there is a NO backup in this case ?


So ... as to "there is no backup in the case" -- this is how I made this "assumption" that it is possible there is back-up:

I was reading a "comment" in a "blog section" of a website which I am NOT allowed to quote here because of the TOS ... And this person who "commented" stated that there was a back-up in the labs because of the high murder rate in K City ... while this person did not state WHO they worked for, it was obvious this person had "knowledge" of "something" ...

I was curious -- so when I did a search on K City, I found an article about the high murder rate ...

Another thought : Lab results can take days, weeks, months and even years to come back ... NOT to be snarky but this is REAL LIFE -- NOT television CSI shows ...

MOO ...
While I agree that Deann should provide a link or state that its only her opinion, how does talking about some comment on an unapproved blog help us in any way?
 
  • #156
They had a cadaver dog hit inside the home...nope, that's not good enough for some.
SBM This 'hit' needs confirmation to mean anything. For the people who always want to mention the Calylee case, those hits were confirmed by multiple hits on the same locations by different dogs. Was this hit ever confirmed by another dog? We dont know so I don't think "we" can say it means anything at this point. They require confirming for a reason.

But you don't know that it was a recent deceased body. It could have been a scent from many years ago. I don't believe there is any way to tell how old a decomp scent is. And I know it was not dirty diapers. But that is Tacopina for you. In no way am I defending him, I think he is sleazy.

According to the search warrant, LE took clothing from the house. No where have I seen that it was indeed the clothing that Lisa was wearing that night. If LE says that, then yes, I would take that into consideration.

And yes, statistics show that most of the time when a child is killed it is done by the parents/caregiver. MOST of the time, not 100% of the time. Sometimes, crazy, unbelievable things happen. And everyone goes, "Well, damn, who would have ever thought someone would DO that?"

But I can't connect the dots in this case, there are none to connect. Parents normally responsible for a child's death, cadaver dog hit. That's it. 2 dots if you go with the decomp. I would even be willing to come off my fence if there was something in the parent's background. Like past involvement with CPS for abuse, or drug convictions, or anything of that nature.

And don't get me wrong, I am in no way saying I am 100% certain that Lisa was abducted and that DB and/or JI are innocent of any wrongdoing. But there is just nothing to sway me to the other side. Yet(maybe) :)

ETA: Oh, I forgot, I DO NOT think it was some random stranger who took the baby. It was someone in that neighborhood/area/someone who knew of or were aquainted with DB and JI however periphially.
Exactly!
:rocker:

Where did the Mike T. work? I think he lived far away from Kansas City. He was on his way to his cousins house @ 4:00am? Did he just leave work nearby?

He works at Ford Motors on the night shift. It is one exit north of this exit. He also lives 90 miles away for a question earlier in the thread as stating that he lives in KC - he doesn't.
SB sends red flags up for me all over the place!
She was at the house the evening Of Baby Lisa's disappearance
She lives next door, yet we never heard of any details she shared about that night
JI went running over there right after he discovered Lisa was missing
SB sticking like glue to DB

And, if SB and her "husband" are divorced, and he lives next door to DB and JI, then where is SB now?

IDK to all questions above!
Just because "we" haven't heard from her does not in any way mean that LE has not. Why should witnesses be doing media interviews? This staying quiet makes me even more impressed with her, not the opposite. They are not divorced yet. She just filed in December and it is still in the works (viewable by public records). She is still local and living with family not very far away. She is still over at JI/DB's very often.
 
  • #157
What you consider evidence, I do not. Let's go through your list.

1. Lawyering up within a few days of baby missing
Not evidence of a crime
2. Refusing to be interviewed separately
Not evidence of a crime
3. Drunken mother who things she may have passed out
Not evidence she harmed her child
4. Clothes removed as evidence of what Lisa was supposed to be wearing
Not sure how that automatically counts as evidence against the parents
5. Mother who never checked on sick baby for ten hours
Evidence of neglect, not murder
6. Cadaver dog hit in bdrm
Evidence!!!
7. mother fails poly
According to DB herself, which may or may not be the truth as it has never been confirmed by LE
8. no evidence of JI wanting to take poly since Oct
But yet there was evidence of LE not required one of him immediately after BL went missing, which is the best time to do a LDT
9. No pleas for child from anyone in family
Evidence of being bad parents, uncaring, not murder
10. no evidence of an abduction
The only way you know this is if you know evidence that LE has that does not point to an abduction
11. monitor on, but mother doesn't hear a thing
Was the monitor on when she went to sleep? Is this linked somewhere?
12. Their dog doesn't bark
Wasn't the dog in the back? Who said the intruder went through the back?
13. No evidence of parents trying to be cleared so case can move forward
This is standard procedure until either a perp is caught or confesses

Finally, the town was showing up with the torches and pitchforks. They were calling it a vigil so they asked them to get off their lawn.

Judge Jeanine Pirro of the Fox News Network asked the couple, "Did you hear anything?"

Lisa Irwin's mother, Deborah Bradley, said, "We had the baby monitor on. We always have one on."

http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/new...-went-missing-
 
  • #158
While I agree that Deann should provide a link or state that its only her opinion, how does talking about some comment on an unapproved blog help us in any way?


Yes, a link should be provided ... and in my original posts, I stated "MOO" ...

Now, I only referenced the comment from another blog because reading that person's comment gave me an "IDEA" -- that is what I was trying to say.


Below is how the conversation went regarding the Lab Results -- and is red by me :

You admitted yourself that you are basing your suspicions on the dog hit and evidence that may or may not even exist re: lab/CSI results. Your (and seemingly everyone else's) evidence is the dog hit. Their behavior after the fact and the missing phones doesn't prove DB murdered her baby. It doesn't explain how/why/when. It doesn't explain the call to MW. It doesn't explain anything. Nor does it point to her.

LE is in the same exact boat, hence why they are not even suspects at this point. Heck, they did more searching and forensics at Ayla Reynolds house than they did at DB's.

It's said that the parents can't be cleared, fine. I agree. But every single story that points away from the parents shouldn't get poopooed either. I'm sure LE did investigate MT's story. Let's not call the guy out for reporting a tip, even if it goes against your suspicion.


My response :

RBBM: Ah ... the Lab Results ... we have not heard about the Lab Results -- sure wish we would ...

But could it be that the Lab is "backed up" ?
The CSI Team searched that house for hours ... even x-rayed the interior ...

See these snippets from : http://www.kansascity.com/2011/12/28/3348273/families-mourn-homicide-victims.html

Kansas City ended 2011 with 114 homicides, the city’s highest tally in three years and a 7.5 percent increase from 2010.

Detectives worked nine double homicides and two triple homicides. That’s 24 deaths — four times as many as the city recorded through multiple killings in 2010.

It looks to me like KC LE has their "hands full" ...


RBBM: As for the parents NOT being cleared -- that is THEIR FAULT -- DB and JI made that decision ... IF they had nothing to do with Lisa being "missing", then DB and JI should "high tail" into LE's offices and do anything and everything they can do clear themselves ...

But they have NOT and do NOT seem to be in the least bit interested. :waitasec: That's right -- they "lawyered up" -- not just 1 attorney but 2 defense attorneys ...


RBBM: I am sure LE did investigate Thompson's "sighting" -- and LE should investigate Thompson's "story ...

I am not "calling him out" for reporting a "tip" -- what I see from reading and listening to all of Thompson's interviews is that he repeatedly "changed" and/or "added info" to his "story".

And that is why I have trouble believing Thompson -- as well as any other "eye witness sightings" ...

MOO ...

:seeya:


The crime lab processed some time ago all the relevant, major significant evidence in this case. There is no backup in this case.


BBM: Do you have a link to this ? TIA !
And, do you have any links that there is a NO backup in this case ?


So ... as to "there is no backup in the case" -- this is how I made this "assumption" that it is possible there is back-up:

I was reading a "comment" in a "blog section" of a website which I am NOT allowed to quote here because of the TOS ... And this person who "commented" stated that there was a back-up in the labs because of the high murder rate in K City ... while this person did not state WHO they worked for, it was obvious this person had "knowledge" of "something" ...

I was curious -- so when I did a search on K City, I found an article about the high murder rate ...

Another thought : Lab results can take days, weeks, months and even years to come back ... NOT to be snarky but this is REAL LIFE -- NOT television CSI shows ...

MOO ...


ALL IS MOO and JMO ...
 
  • #159
Yes, a link should be provided ... and in my original posts, I stated "MOO" ...

Now, I only referenced the comment from another blog because reading that person's comment gave me an "IDEA" -- that is what I was trying to say.


Below is how the conversation went regarding the Lab Results -- and is red by me :




My response :










ALL IS MOO and JMO ...

What if I said that I read a comment in an unapproved blog were someone said that the lab work was completed and there was no backup in lab work. Then I go on and say that it made sense in a hi- profile active case for the lab to be told to give this case priority. I would be using the unapproved blog comment to bolster my post. Sorry, but I don't believe that comments from unapproved blogs belong here.
 
  • #160
:waitasec:

How many things point away from the parents? We have one witness who say a man carrying a baby @ 4:00am. We have another who's having his wife explain what he saw. We have a dialed phone call (not complted) which may or may not be a wrong number. There is no doubt these were investigated to the full extent...and then some. They have nothing, no leads. They have a handyman in custody but it is no help.

Now, the evidence that points towards the parents.
1. Lawyering up within a few days of baby missing
2. Refusing to be interviewed separately
3. Drunken mother who things she may have passed out
4. Clothes removed as evidence of what Lisa was supposed to be wearing
5. Mother who never checked on sick baby for ten hours
6. Cadaver dog hit in bdrm
7. mother fails poly
8. no evidence of JI wanting to take poly since Oct
9. No pleas for child from anyone in family
10. no evidence of an abduction
11. monitor on, but mother doesn't hear a thing
12. Their dog doesn't bark
13. No evidence of parents trying to be cleared so case can move forward

.....No wonder the public thinks they're guilty. The Town's people should be arriving with torches and pitchforks, imo.


:goodpost: :goodpost:

You "nailed it" as to WHY the evidence points to DB and JI ...

MOO MOO and MOO ...
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
2,741
Total visitors
2,888

Forum statistics

Threads
633,192
Messages
18,637,752
Members
243,442
Latest member
Jsandy210
Back
Top