- Joined
- Apr 16, 2018
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 154
@kemo Regarding DNA testing in cold cases - is this more successful in bringing a solution when the killer is a stranger to the victim? What happens if a killer is known to a victim and can excuse their DNA being found at a crime scene?
I had read that the DNA research would be on the stone used to kill Sophie: if it is, it does not matter that the killer is close to this beautiful young woman.''For example, if a family member assaults another family member within their home, DNA of both parties will be found all over the home because they both live there, so DNA may not be helpful in determining guilt as some other form of evidence''DNA Evidence: Applications
www.forensicsciencesimplified.org
If Ian Bailey’s Touch DNA is on the rock, that would settle this issue once and for all, otherwise we won’t learn much at all. No DNA tells us nothing. It doesn’t even clear Bailey since contact doesn’t always result in DNA transfer. Unidentified DNA either means someone else is the perpetrator or someone had contact with it unrelated to the crime.I had read that the DNA research would be on the stone used to kill Sophie: if it is, it does not matter that the killer is close to this beautiful young woman.
If Bailey’s DNA is on the stone, it signals his guilt no matter what you think. I love Ireland.If Ian Bailey’s Touch DNA is on the rock, that would settle this issue once and for all, otherwise we won’t learn much at all. No DNA tells us nothing. It doesn’t even clear Bailey since contact doesn’t always result in DNA transfer. Unidentified DNA either means someone else is the perpetrator or someone had contact with it unrelated to the crime.
If they get a result from the DNA it will be Ian Bailey's![]()
How do you know? Real question.If they get a result from the DNA it will be Ian Bailey's
I am wondering with all her unreliable stories if she isn't being truthful for a reason. She seemed to insert herself as well as IB.It could certainly explain Marie Farrell’s obsession with Sophie! How likely was it that she saw Sophie in the Shop on Saturday and then is the person who puts IB at Kealfadda Bridge? Her husband has a history of violence… was she protecting him & inventing the ‘affair’? People who were in her ‘circle’ when she was in the relationship with the ex could easily have identified him!
Maire was having an affair apparently and was in the car with her lover or had come from a liason with him when she asserted it was Bailey on the bridge . She lied to protect her marriageI am wondering with all her unreliable stories if she isn't being truthful for a reason. She seemed to insert herself as well as IB.
@su5ie ! I was going to msg you about this case!!! Then while reading from the beginning of the thread last night, I saw you posted here, yay! I was hoping you were into this one and curious your somewhat Irish perspectiveMaire was having an affair apparently and was in the car with her lover or had come from a liason with him when she asserted it was Bailey on the bridge . She lied to protect her marriage
Doesn't make sense but there you go , it's easily googled
I'm unsure if Bailey did it ,he was a violent man to jules but did he kill Sophie, I don't know .
I think she was in an open marriage and had many lovers and so did her husband. So was she entertaining that night I don't know
This case unsolved is a stain on the irish police force and at the time and before in other cases like the una lynsky case there was a lot of corruption so its very hard to know if Bailey was moulded to fit the crime
I know harribson the state forensic examiner was delayed as apparently he was at a Christmas party and drunk
So couldn't attend there was also rumour he was unfit to do his job as he was an alcoholic
I feel because Sophie ran down the garden path toward the gate she either went to meet someone to open the gate or she fled from someone in the house
She had no curtains on the windows as far as I know so could it have been a random stalker ,peeping Tom that observed her by chance while driving down country roads and decided to hang around and follow her and then murder her
I can't fathom how no dna would be found ,it was extremely gruesome murder and her post mortem is a stomach churning read
I don't think it will ever be solved
Definitely a strong theory, a whack to the head to disorientate even a little gives the attacker a big advantage.I also can't understand how Sophie had no dna under her fingernails surely she fought back at some stage even initially unless she was hit immediately with the block and it knocked her unconscious. I wonder was there blood in her lungs through swallowing