missgreenbanks
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2018
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 142
@kemo Regarding DNA testing in cold cases - is this more successful in bringing a solution when the killer is a stranger to the victim? What happens if a killer is known to a victim and can excuse their DNA being found at a crime scene?
I had read that the DNA research would be on the stone used to kill Sophie: if it is, it does not matter that the killer is close to this beautiful young woman.''For example, if a family member assaults another family member within their home, DNA of both parties will be found all over the home because they both live there, so DNA may not be helpful in determining guilt as some other form of evidence''DNA Evidence: Applications
www.forensicsciencesimplified.org
If Ian Bailey’s Touch DNA is on the rock, that would settle this issue once and for all, otherwise we won’t learn much at all. No DNA tells us nothing. It doesn’t even clear Bailey since contact doesn’t always result in DNA transfer. Unidentified DNA either means someone else is the perpetrator or someone had contact with it unrelated to the crime.I had read that the DNA research would be on the stone used to kill Sophie: if it is, it does not matter that the killer is close to this beautiful young woman.
If Bailey’s DNA is on the stone, it signals his guilt no matter what you think. I love Ireland.If Ian Bailey’s Touch DNA is on the rock, that would settle this issue once and for all, otherwise we won’t learn much at all. No DNA tells us nothing. It doesn’t even clear Bailey since contact doesn’t always result in DNA transfer. Unidentified DNA either means someone else is the perpetrator or someone had contact with it unrelated to the crime.