heartfortruth
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2008
- Messages
- 729
- Reaction score
- 12
I havent read through the whole thread but wow Im sure the DT loves this thread :crazy: I guess my question would be Is it easier for some to believe that GA had something to do with it? Im starting to believe that Beaz is right in a way about the pretty young mother remark when it comes to how some perceive it. Do I think at one time in the media GA protected his daughter in a sense yes but I dont believe he had anything to do with what happen to Caylee and I dont think he is lying in his testimony either. GA has his faults as a parent and has some low self estem issues and losing Caylee was more then the man could bare so he tried what many have thought about after losing a loved one. Doesn't mean he was guilty of anything just meant it was more then he could take or deal with at the time. Watching those jail house visits showed a spoiled young women who wanted every thing to be about her and when she didnt get it she throw a fit. There was no fear of her parents what so ever during the whole video's. I seen some not so great parents in way over there head. They tried to make things right by putting more pressure on ICA to finally step up to the plate and to try and be responsible parent to Caylee but by then it was to late. IMO ICA was never abused sexually or physically. I wouldn't be surprised if it was ICA who had become voilent in the past to her parents when and if she didnt get the attention she seeked. I personally dont believe GA or LA did anything. I have the opinion the whole family tipped toed around ICA most of the time in fear of setting her off and never held her responsible for her actions. I dont think any of them believe ICA would ever hurt Caylee but they were wrong just like they were about alot of things. The only person responsible for Caylee death is ICA :twocents:
You come very close to perfectly describing a family that I know VERY WELL. As I have followed this case I have become concerned for a child that is not old enough to talk yet to be able to tell the grandparents what they probably already KNOW and don't want to hear. Their dtr. "absolutely" RULES their lives as the mother waits on her hand and foot and takes care of her child most of the time.
Oddly, at one point, when things were not going her way and before she had the child and the parents were trying to "encourage" her to move out on her own she threatened to claim "abuse". That was several years ago and she still lives with them and the parents still "clean up behind her" , in more ways than one!!! And they KNOW IT! but can't stop themselves!!!
I am thankful I am not in their shoes (or head) as I am thankful for the same thing with the Anthonys. .
I think GA may have lied about some things but I just can't believe most of the allegations spewed out against him in the OS. Guess I might have to eat my words (been there, done that) but I think he was a man caught in a situation that he could not really understand or handle. I really don't think he is very "sophisticated" in his thinking. I would have to have more than KC's "word" to believe he molested her or did NOTHING but yell at her after the "accident" and help bury Caylee, who he obviously loved dearly .......not even sure there was an accident at all.
I'm with those who say ......OK...go with the accident if that's all you have but leave G out of it!
by the way.......(is this OT?).....when CM talked about the "flat affect" (alluding, I believe, to effects of her "abuse") I wanted to come out of my chair. All that I have read and SEEN about KC before the trial started and during breaks when the jury was out of the room depicts, to me, a very animated young lady, able to "win friends and influence people"......which would include , it appears, her DT.
just thoughts really