Camper
New Member
Anyone know if the pilot testified at the GJ?
.
.
How do we even know FOR SURE that they had a trip planned the next morning. Heck, that could just be yet ANOTHER lie. imo
John went out to the airport to check out the plane on Christmas afternoon. According to Patsy and John, Patsy did not want to go to Michigan at first, but relented and had the Michigan house readied for their arrival. Lights were put up, etc. The trip was planned and they were going to meet John's other children there.
WE were told that JR GA group were flying from GA to MPLS to meet JR there, THEN fly on to MI in JR plane.
Correct me IF I err on that.
.
Camper I am not very good about all the initials. I assume GA is Georgia, but I don't know what the rest are.
I am not sure if they were picking anyone up. I do know they planned to fly out early December 26th.
Hmmm, - JR is John Ramsey
MPLS was the old time abreviation for Minneapolis when I worked for Mountain Bell.
GA is the current abreviation for Georgia
MI is the current abreviation for Michigan
.
WE were told that JR GA group were flying from GA to MPLS to meet JR there, THEN fly on to MI in JR plane.
Correct me IF I err on that.
.
I recall reading where's John Ramsey calls Mike Archuleta's home the morning of the 26th. Mike's wife answers the phone and tells John that Mike is not home...is on his way to the airport.
Can that be a lie....as in Mike Archuleta is really not driving to the airport...but is flying in to the airport from GA?
I recall reading where's John Ramsey calls Mike Archuleta's home the morning of the 26th. Mike's wife answers the phone and tells John that Mike is not home...is on his way to the airport.
Can that be a lie....as in Mike Archuleta is really not driving to the airport...but is flying in to the airport from GA?
I recall reading where's John Ramsey calls Mike Archuleta's home the morning of the 26th. Mike's wife answers the phone and tells John that Mike is not home...is on his way to the airport.
Can that be a lie....as in Mike Archuleta is really not driving to the airport...but is flying in to the airport from GA?
--->>>That is what I have always believed. THAT 'someone'
was shuttled out of Boulder that night. I also believe that
someone accompanied the 'person' to handle them in a state
of panic and or being under the influence. RUI if you will
'riding under the influence' and needing the attention of
someone other than the pilot.
JR's plane was very very fast with the new things he added
well described in DOI by JR himself. I never checked the dollar
outlay for the NEW faster things he had added to the plane, yet
he then sold the plane to his pilot, electronic media stated
at a greatly reduced price.
JR sold the plane the end of 1997 to help pay for his legal fees, per
DOI.
.
Camper,
Although an interesting theory it suffers from the similar drawback that Steve Thomas' Toilet Rage has, e.g. its inconsistent with the forensic evidence, that is if a 3rd party was ferried out of Boulder that night, why was JonBenet's corpse not also transported out too, since many have speculated the reason she was left in the wine-cellar was due to the reluctance to dump her body outdoors?
Similar reasoning can be applied to aspects of BlueCrab's BDI.
.
--->>>Yet another question UKGuy, that only the participants
could answer for.
WE as sleuths can only speculate on what WE would 'have' done.
WE cannot put ourselves into the madness and panic of 'that'
night. Plus there are more of us than there were of 'them'
to have more complex and complete coverage of 'how come'
speculations.
JR himself said it looked like an 'in house' job. IF IF he is
correct, then to have kept the perpetrator 'close' would have
been another person to 'die' in prison.
More complex thinking on 'that' night may have eluded those
involved.
.
What?
We're spoiled by all the CSI shows...justice never moves THAT fast!
Yes, and on CSI shows they draw conclusions from the evidence they do find. Imagine that!
Thanks for posting that explanation Camper. Like Solace, I was thinking "what", but didn't want to post it.
If you insert John Andrew into the house that night, a lot of things sure do make sense. But how do you place him in the house?
John got a lawyer for his ex-wife. I don't think this was cautious overkill. He was trying to wall her off because of what she knew about that night or because she had information about John or John Andrew's behavior in the past that could prove to be damaging. If it was information about that night then it had to involve John Andrew.
that is if a 3rd party was ferried out of Boulder that night, why was JonBenet's corpse not also transported out too,
.
transporting the killer away from the crime scene and body separates the two,which may have been what they wanted?That is,IF it was not JR or PR,but someone they knew.
JMO8778,
Sure, separating the killer from the crime scene surely does not preclude also removing the body, otherwise those resident at the crime scene become prime suspects?
The same reasoning applies if the 3rd party left on foot or by car etc, if the 3rd party can remove forensic evidence, why not remove the body too?
.